Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

pbmus

(12,422 posts) Thu Feb 14, 2019, 06:44 PM Feb 2019

Treasury trying to spin low/no refunds as positive....

Link to tweet

3 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Treasury trying to spin low/no refunds as positive.... (Original Post) pbmus Feb 2019 OP

NOTHING NEW HERE ROB-ROX Feb 2019 #1

Don't go blaming everyone else (too low of a withholding, etc.)...plain and simple reason is ... SWBTATTReg Feb 2019 #2

Well,this story is the truth that Trump's Wellstone ruled Feb 2019 #3

ROB-ROX

(767 posts)

1. NOTHING NEW HERE

Reply to pbmus (Original post)

Thu Feb 14, 2019, 06:57 PM

Feb 2019

We all knew that the republicans were going to get their tax money from the middle class. The rich escape AGAIN. I did my tax paper and I will see 33% less from my refund this year. I know the republican voting dullards will not wake up because they lack the intelligence to do their own tax papers and they fail to realize their refund is LESS. The republicans had to find a source of money for the government to run so they choose the middle class to fund their TURD ideas. I just hope the democratic representatives do something besides SCREW up AGAIN!!!

SWBTATTReg

(22,114 posts)

2. Don't go blaming everyone else (too low of a withholding, etc.)...plain and simple reason is ...

Reply to pbmus (Original post)

Thu Feb 14, 2019, 06:58 PM

Feb 2019

that you took these refunds and gave them to your donors instead.

Wellstone ruled

(34,661 posts)

3. Well,this story is the truth that Trump's

Reply to pbmus (Original post)

Thu Feb 14, 2019, 07:02 PM

Feb 2019

days are numbered. Do not F with those suckers pocketbooks.

Reply to this discussion