Tue Feb 19, 2019, 09:09 AM
True Dough (14,769 posts)
Post one word that best describes how you feel about Bernie Sanders entering the 2020 raceThis discussion thread was locked by Skinner (a host of the General Discussion forum).
|
367 replies, 6839 views
Cannot reply in locked threads
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
True Dough | Feb 2019 | OP |
samnsara | Feb 2019 | #1 | |
brush | Feb 2019 | #359 | |
tazkcmo | Feb 2019 | #2 | |
WillowTree | Feb 2019 | #73 | |
ProudMNDemocrat | Feb 2019 | #3 | |
abqtommy | Feb 2019 | #4 | |
WhiskeyGrinder | Feb 2019 | #5 | |
trueblue2007 | Feb 2019 | #253 | |
DFW | Feb 2019 | #275 | |
UniteFightBack | Feb 2019 | #6 | |
True Dough | Feb 2019 | #15 | |
Cha | Feb 2019 | #250 | |
honest.abe | Feb 2019 | #7 | |
treestar | Feb 2019 | #8 | |
NastyRiffraff | Feb 2019 | #220 | |
Adrahil | Feb 2019 | #9 | |
Dennis Donovan | Feb 2019 | #10 | |
SammyWinstonJack | Feb 2019 | #219 | |
roody | Feb 2019 | #357 | |
ProudMNDemocrat | Feb 2019 | #11 | |
CrossingTheRubicon | Feb 2019 | #12 | |
janterry | Feb 2019 | #13 | |
Johnny2X2X | Feb 2019 | #14 | |
MrsCoffee | Feb 2019 | #29 | |
Squinch | Feb 2019 | #35 | |
Maru Kitteh | Feb 2019 | #114 | |
Apollyonus | Feb 2019 | #182 | |
Grasswire2 | Feb 2019 | #305 | |
Apollyonus | Feb 2019 | #181 | |
allgood33 | Feb 2019 | #216 | |
Voltaire2 | Feb 2019 | #37 | |
Johnny2X2X | Feb 2019 | #49 | |
lapucelle | Feb 2019 | #62 | |
MrsCoffee | Feb 2019 | #67 | |
lapucelle | Feb 2019 | #75 | |
irresistable | Feb 2019 | #123 | |
lapucelle | Feb 2019 | #135 | |
irresistable | Feb 2019 | #139 | |
lapucelle | Feb 2019 | #141 | |
irresistable | Feb 2019 | #150 | |
lapucelle | Feb 2019 | #157 | |
irresistable | Feb 2019 | #160 | |
lapucelle | Feb 2019 | #170 | |
irresistable | Feb 2019 | #176 | |
lapucelle | Feb 2019 | #233 | |
irresistable | Feb 2019 | #234 | |
lapucelle | Feb 2019 | #242 | |
irresistable | Feb 2019 | #273 | |
lapucelle | Feb 2019 | #276 | |
irresistable | Feb 2019 | #282 | |
lapucelle | Feb 2019 | #285 | |
irresistable | Feb 2019 | #287 | |
lapucelle | Feb 2019 | #289 | |
irresistable | Feb 2019 | #299 | |
lapucelle | Feb 2019 | #321 | |
irresistable | Feb 2019 | #323 | |
lapucelle | Feb 2019 | #324 | |
irresistable | Feb 2019 | #325 | |
lapucelle | Feb 2019 | #333 | |
irresistable | Feb 2019 | #334 | |
lapucelle | Feb 2019 | #283 | |
awesomerwb1 | Feb 2019 | #264 | |
Voltaire2 | Feb 2019 | #207 | |
lapucelle | Feb 2019 | #231 | |
Voltaire2 | Feb 2019 | #246 | |
lapucelle | Feb 2019 | #272 | |
Voltaire2 | Feb 2019 | #295 | |
lapucelle | Feb 2019 | #297 | |
Voltaire2 | Feb 2019 | #362 | |
George II | Feb 2019 | #364 | |
Squinch | Feb 2019 | #68 | |
lapucelle | Feb 2019 | #143 | |
Apollyonus | Feb 2019 | #185 | |
Sugarcoated | Feb 2019 | #240 | |
Apollyonus | Feb 2019 | #245 | |
Demsrule86 | Feb 2019 | #340 | |
George II | Feb 2019 | #365 | |
Voltaire2 | Feb 2019 | #366 | |
NRaleighLiberal | Feb 2019 | #16 | |
NatBurner | Feb 2019 | #151 | |
GoCubsGo | Feb 2019 | #167 | |
DontBooVote | Feb 2019 | #17 | |
mainstreetonce | Feb 2019 | #18 | |
Gothmog | Feb 2019 | #108 | |
Kurt V. | Feb 2019 | #19 | |
Tech | Feb 2019 | #20 | |
backtoblue | Feb 2019 | #21 | |
MrsCoffee | Feb 2019 | #22 | |
malchickiwick | Feb 2019 | #23 | |
cally | Feb 2019 | #24 | |
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin | Feb 2019 | #237 | |
rzemanfl | Feb 2019 | #25 | |
Squinch | Feb 2019 | #26 | |
Happyhippychick | Feb 2019 | #27 | |
Soph0571 | Feb 2019 | #28 | |
WoonTars | Feb 2019 | #350 | |
Soph0571 | Feb 2019 | #358 | |
The Velveteen Ocelot | Feb 2019 | #30 | |
revmclaren | Feb 2019 | #31 | |
Demit | Feb 2019 | #32 | |
crazytown | Feb 2019 | #33 | |
grantcart | Feb 2019 | #132 | |
Voltaire2 | Feb 2019 | #34 | |
Rebl2 | Feb 2019 | #36 | |
shanny | Feb 2019 | #38 | |
apcalc | Feb 2019 | #39 | |
True Dough | Feb 2019 | #53 | |
2naSalit | Feb 2019 | #40 | |
LakeArenal | Feb 2019 | #102 | |
GoneOffShore | Feb 2019 | #317 | |
brooklynite | Feb 2019 | #41 | |
True Dough | Feb 2019 | #56 | |
backabby-blue | Feb 2019 | #42 | |
samplegirl | Feb 2019 | #43 | |
LongtimeAZDem | Feb 2019 | #44 | |
titaniumsalute | Feb 2019 | #45 | |
True Dough | Feb 2019 | #58 | |
ecstatic | Feb 2019 | #46 | |
exboyfil | Feb 2019 | #81 | |
Maru Kitteh | Feb 2019 | #88 | |
uponit7771 | Feb 2019 | #218 | |
still_one | Feb 2019 | #47 | |
oasis | Feb 2019 | #314 | |
California_Republic | Feb 2019 | #48 | |
True Dough | Feb 2019 | #65 | |
California_Republic | Feb 2019 | #121 | |
California_Republic | Feb 2019 | #131 | |
romana | Feb 2019 | #50 | |
democratisphere | Feb 2019 | #51 | |
mikeysnot | Feb 2019 | #52 | |
Chemisse | Feb 2019 | #54 | |
KansasKali | Feb 2019 | #55 | |
LonePirate | Feb 2019 | #57 | |
disillusioned73 | Feb 2019 | #59 | |
Moostache | Feb 2019 | #60 | |
happybird | Feb 2019 | #76 | |
jalan48 | Feb 2019 | #61 | |
ginnyinWI | Feb 2019 | #63 | |
Evergreen Emerald | Feb 2019 | #64 | |
Shrek | Feb 2019 | #66 | |
CaptainTruth | Feb 2019 | #69 | |
aikoaiko | Feb 2019 | #70 | |
mulsh | Feb 2019 | #71 | |
Phoenix61 | Feb 2019 | #77 | |
tammywammy | Feb 2019 | #72 | |
LAS14 | Feb 2019 | #74 | |
Tom Rinaldo | Feb 2019 | #78 | |
The Blue Flower | Feb 2019 | #79 | |
redstateblues | Feb 2019 | #80 | |
zipplewrath | Feb 2019 | #82 | |
OregonBlue | Feb 2019 | #83 | |
lapucelle | Feb 2019 | #84 | |
lapucelle | Feb 2019 | #85 | |
lapucelle | Feb 2019 | #87 | |
True Dough | Feb 2019 | #95 | |
lapucelle | Feb 2019 | #137 | |
underpants | Feb 2019 | #86 | |
Squinch | Feb 2019 | #155 | |
riverine | Feb 2019 | #89 | |
Maru Kitteh | Feb 2019 | #112 | |
Spider Jerusalem | Feb 2019 | #90 | |
Post removed | Feb 2019 | #91 | |
comradebillyboy | Feb 2019 | #92 | |
G_j | Feb 2019 | #93 | |
jrthin | Feb 2019 | #94 | |
AirmensMom | Feb 2019 | #96 | |
Rene | Feb 2019 | #97 | |
Blue_Tires | Feb 2019 | #98 | |
Blue_Tires | Feb 2019 | #232 | |
JHB | Feb 2019 | #99 | |
missingthebigdog | Feb 2019 | #100 | |
dalton99a | Feb 2019 | #101 | |
Joe941 | Feb 2019 | #103 | |
Tribalceltic | Feb 2019 | #104 | |
MontanaMama | Feb 2019 | #105 | |
CentralMass | Feb 2019 | #106 | |
Gothmog | Feb 2019 | #107 | |
dalton99a | Feb 2019 | #134 | |
gibraltar72 | Feb 2019 | #109 | |
Gidney N Cloyd | Feb 2019 | #110 | |
Odoreida | Feb 2019 | #111 | |
cornball 24 | Feb 2019 | #113 | |
Polly Hennessey | Feb 2019 | #115 | |
MrGrieves | Feb 2019 | #116 | |
cwydro | Feb 2019 | #117 | |
pamdb | Feb 2019 | #118 | |
honest.abe | Feb 2019 | #119 | |
ebbie15644 | Feb 2019 | #120 | |
Hortensis | Feb 2019 | #122 | |
agingdem | Feb 2019 | #124 | |
rgbecker | Feb 2019 | #125 | |
David__77 | Feb 2019 | #126 | |
YessirAtsaFact | Feb 2019 | #127 | |
snowybirdie | Feb 2019 | #128 | |
Shrike47 | Feb 2019 | #129 | |
windje | Feb 2019 | #130 | |
Stare Decisis | Feb 2019 | #133 | |
W_HAMILTON | Feb 2019 | #136 | |
SaveOurDemocracy | Feb 2019 | #138 | |
lunamagica | Feb 2019 | #140 | |
backscatter712 | Feb 2019 | #142 | |
milestogo | Feb 2019 | #144 | |
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin | Feb 2019 | #145 | |
Thekaspervote | Feb 2019 | #146 | |
aeromanKC | Feb 2019 | #147 | |
WeekiWater | Feb 2019 | #148 | |
SCRUBDASHRUB | Feb 2019 | #149 | |
VOX | Feb 2019 | #152 | |
GemDigger | Feb 2019 | #153 | |
sakabatou | Feb 2019 | #154 | |
Squinch | Feb 2019 | #156 | |
LEW | Feb 2019 | #158 | |
snpsmom | Feb 2019 | #159 | |
Tiggeroshii | Feb 2019 | #161 | |
DFW | Feb 2019 | #162 | |
Tiggeroshii | Feb 2019 | #163 | |
FakeNoose | Feb 2019 | #164 | |
Basic LA | Feb 2019 | #165 | |
GoCubsGo | Feb 2019 | #166 | |
WheelWalker | Feb 2019 | #168 | |
MurrayDelph | Feb 2019 | #169 | |
lilactime | Feb 2019 | #171 | |
intheozone | Feb 2019 | #172 | |
Desert grandma | Feb 2019 | #173 | |
sarcasmo | Feb 2019 | #174 | |
Apollyonus | Feb 2019 | #175 | |
Power 2 the People | Feb 2019 | #177 | |
OhZone | Feb 2019 | #178 | |
Dyedinthewoolliberal | Feb 2019 | #179 | |
Skidmore | Feb 2019 | #180 | |
lagomorph777 | Feb 2019 | #183 | |
frogmarch | Feb 2019 | #184 | |
beachbum bob | Feb 2019 | #186 | |
Kentonio | Feb 2019 | #187 | |
KPN | Feb 2019 | #188 | |
Devil Child | Feb 2019 | #189 | |
DavidDvorkin | Feb 2019 | #190 | |
theophilus | Feb 2019 | #191 | |
Guy Whitey Corngood | Feb 2019 | #192 | |
Kingofalldems | Feb 2019 | #193 | |
ZeroSomeBrains | Feb 2019 | #194 | |
Peachhead22 | Feb 2019 | #195 | |
Gothmog | Feb 2019 | #196 | |
AkFemDem | Feb 2019 | #197 | |
ProudLib72 | Feb 2019 | #198 | |
True Dough | Feb 2019 | #199 | |
frazzled | Feb 2019 | #223 | |
True Dough | Feb 2019 | #225 | |
Bev54 | Feb 2019 | #200 | |
java108 | Feb 2019 | #201 | |
yortsed snacilbuper | Feb 2019 | #202 | |
Loki Liesmith | Feb 2019 | #203 | |
blackdove78 | Feb 2019 | #204 | |
Runningdawg | Feb 2019 | #205 | |
Delmette2.0 | Feb 2019 | #206 | |
leftynyc | Feb 2019 | #208 | |
CherokeeDem | Feb 2019 | #209 | |
TJKay | Feb 2019 | #210 | |
LuvLoogie | Feb 2019 | #211 | |
fishwax | Feb 2019 | #212 | |
allgood33 | Feb 2019 | #213 | |
Lucid Dreamer | Feb 2019 | #214 | |
Panich52 | Feb 2019 | #215 | |
CrossingTheRubicon | Feb 2019 | #217 | |
Kahuna7 | Feb 2019 | #258 | |
SammyWinstonJack | Feb 2019 | #221 | |
Puzzledtraveller | Feb 2019 | #222 | |
LovingA2andMI | Feb 2019 | #224 | |
PubliusEnigma | Feb 2019 | #226 | |
Vinca | Feb 2019 | #227 | |
guillaumeb | Feb 2019 | #228 | |
wcmagumba | Feb 2019 | #229 | |
elleng | Feb 2019 | #230 | |
MaryMagdaline | Feb 2019 | #235 | |
BigDemVoter | Feb 2019 | #236 | |
mvd | Feb 2019 | #238 | |
Sugarcoated | Feb 2019 | #239 | |
Yosemito | Feb 2019 | #241 | |
Different Drummer | Feb 2019 | #243 | |
True Dough | Feb 2019 | #244 | |
Books_Tea_Alone | Feb 2019 | #247 | |
Arazi | Feb 2019 | #248 | |
betsuni | Feb 2019 | #249 | |
Cha | Feb 2019 | #252 | |
True Dough | Feb 2019 | #262 | |
betsuni | Feb 2019 | #266 | |
True Dough | Feb 2019 | #281 | |
betsuni | Feb 2019 | #322 | |
ProfessorGAC | Feb 2019 | #251 | |
True Dough | Feb 2019 | #263 | |
ProfessorGAC | Feb 2019 | #315 | |
True Dough | Feb 2019 | #319 | |
standingtall | Feb 2019 | #254 | |
InAbLuEsTaTe | Feb 2019 | #255 | |
Kahuna7 | Feb 2019 | #256 | |
wryter2000 | Feb 2019 | #257 | |
Glimmer of Hope | Feb 2019 | #259 | |
awesomerwb1 | Feb 2019 | #260 | |
Freethinker65 | Feb 2019 | #261 | |
Zen Democrat | Feb 2019 | #265 | |
Clash City Rocker | Feb 2019 | #267 | |
Historic NY | Feb 2019 | #268 | |
Doremus | Feb 2019 | #269 | |
DeminPennswoods | Feb 2019 | #270 | |
blitzen | Feb 2019 | #271 | |
Metatron | Feb 2019 | #274 | |
DarthDem | Feb 2019 | #277 | |
peacefreak2.0 | Feb 2019 | #278 | |
polmaven | Feb 2019 | #279 | |
R B Garr | Feb 2019 | #280 | |
True Dough | Feb 2019 | #284 | |
R B Garr | Feb 2019 | #291 | |
doc03 | Feb 2019 | #286 | |
Apollyonus | Feb 2019 | #288 | |
lamp_shade | Feb 2019 | #290 | |
tavernier | Feb 2019 | #292 | |
pampango | Feb 2019 | #293 | |
vercetti2021 | Feb 2019 | #294 | |
Cha | Feb 2019 | #308 | |
ploppy | Feb 2019 | #296 | |
SidDithers | Feb 2019 | #298 | |
highplainsdem | Feb 2019 | #300 | |
sprinkleeninow | Feb 2019 | #301 | |
RandySF | Feb 2019 | #302 | |
egduj | Feb 2019 | #303 | |
akraven | Feb 2019 | #304 | |
Demonaut | Feb 2019 | #306 | |
roamer65 | Feb 2019 | #307 | |
Demovictory9 | Feb 2019 | #309 | |
Celerity | Feb 2019 | #310 | |
garybeck | Feb 2019 | #311 | |
scardycat | Feb 2019 | #312 | |
workinclasszero | Feb 2019 | #313 | |
MyNameGoesHere | Feb 2019 | #316 | |
ananda | Feb 2019 | #318 | |
scarytomcat | Feb 2019 | #320 | |
BootinUp | Feb 2019 | #326 | |
lark | Feb 2019 | #327 | |
Autumn | Feb 2019 | #328 | |
Cha | Feb 2019 | #329 | |
librechik | Feb 2019 | #330 | |
GitRDun | Feb 2019 | #331 | |
PBC_Democrat | Feb 2019 | #332 | |
jiminvegas | Feb 2019 | #335 | |
True Dough | Feb 2019 | #341 | |
SKKY | Feb 2019 | #336 | |
True Dough | Feb 2019 | #342 | |
Doodley | Feb 2019 | #337 | |
Demsrule86 | Feb 2019 | #338 | |
Sucha NastyWoman | Feb 2019 | #339 | |
lillypaddle | Feb 2019 | #343 | |
lillypaddle | Feb 2019 | #344 | |
True Dough | Feb 2019 | #345 | |
lillypaddle | Feb 2019 | #360 | |
TexasBlueDog | Feb 2019 | #346 | |
True Dough | Feb 2019 | #347 | |
Sparkly | Feb 2019 | #348 | |
WoonTars | Feb 2019 | #349 | |
sacto95834 | Feb 2019 | #351 | |
Politicub | Feb 2019 | #352 | |
Anon-C | Feb 2019 | #353 | |
Midwestern Democrat | Feb 2019 | #354 | |
Peacetrain | Feb 2019 | #355 | |
roody | Feb 2019 | #356 | |
AncientGeezer | Feb 2019 | #361 | |
Ilsa | Feb 2019 | #363 | |
Skinner | Feb 2019 | #367 |
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 09:10 AM
samnsara (16,822 posts)
1. AGAIN????
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to samnsara (Reply #1)
Wed Feb 20, 2019, 12:02 PM
brush (46,209 posts)
359. Eclipsed.
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 09:10 AM
tazkcmo (7,089 posts)
2. Yawn n/t
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to tazkcmo (Reply #2)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 09:55 AM
WillowTree (5,324 posts)
73. You beat me to it.
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
ProudMNDemocrat This message was self-deleted by its author.
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 09:11 AM
abqtommy (14,118 posts)
4. Post one word that best describes how you feel about Bernie Sanders entering the 2020 race
disappointed
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 09:12 AM
WhiskeyGrinder (19,176 posts)
5. Bored.
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to WhiskeyGrinder (Reply #5)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 04:46 PM
trueblue2007 (16,211 posts)
253. Bozo
![]() |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to trueblue2007 (Reply #253)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 05:30 PM
DFW (49,995 posts)
275. Hey! Them's fightin' words!
One of my good friends was named Božo. He was a kind, extremely gifted artisan who made the most incredible 12 string guitars on earth. He was originally from Novi Sad in Serbia, where that is a common first name. He passed away a couple of years ago, unfortunately, but he had exactly ZERO in common with Mr. Sanders!
[URL= ![]() ![]() |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 09:12 AM
UniteFightBack (8,231 posts)
6. Divisive. nt
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to UniteFightBack (Reply #6)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 09:15 AM
True Dough (14,769 posts)
15. That was definitely my #2 pick!
I wish Bernie's presence wasn't so divisive but it is what it is.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to UniteFightBack (Reply #6)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 04:45 PM
Cha (282,443 posts)
250. Hey, that's my
word!
![]() |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 09:12 AM
honest.abe (7,127 posts)
7. Puke.
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 09:12 AM
treestar (80,844 posts)
8. annoyed
imagine the shrieking if Hillary did that. What about the call for "new blood?"
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to treestar (Reply #8)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 01:29 PM
NastyRiffraff (12,448 posts)
220. Exactly!
The VERY SAME PEOPLE who say Hillary had better not run (or else!) because of her age/we need new blood, etc. are salivating about a Sanders run. I will NEVER vote for him, and I feel confident saying that since he has no chance in the primary.
My one word answer: Yechhhh |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 09:13 AM
Adrahil (13,340 posts)
9. Depressed.
That man has no self-reflexivity and has no idea (or does not care) why people like me are upset with him.
I have the feeling we're about to get 4 more years of Trump, as we rip ourselves apart for the sake of a man who holds the Democratic party in disdain. |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 09:13 AM
Dennis Donovan (18,761 posts)
10. Happy.
His voice is important and his message should resonate with all Liberals and Progressives.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to Dennis Donovan (Reply #10)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 01:28 PM
SammyWinstonJack (44,095 posts)
219. +1000000.
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to Dennis Donovan (Reply #10)
Wed Feb 20, 2019, 11:43 AM
roody (10,842 posts)
357. +6,000,000
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 09:14 AM
ProudMNDemocrat (13,128 posts)
11. Bewildered.....
![]() |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 09:14 AM
CrossingTheRubicon (731 posts)
12. Unhappy
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 09:15 AM
janterry (4,429 posts)
13. Excellent
the more the merrier. He'll drive the convo left, and that's fine by me.
We spent some time with him last Saturday (my daughter was a finalist in the Bernie Sanders State of the Union contest for high school students in VT. He was lovely. |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 09:15 AM
Johnny2X2X (15,479 posts)
14. Happy
Drives our party to the left where it needs to be. Offers working people something.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to Johnny2X2X (Reply #14)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 09:25 AM
MrsCoffee (5,552 posts)
29. Yeah, cuz no other Dem candidates offer working people anything...
![]() I can’t believe people are falling for this shit again. |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to MrsCoffee (Reply #29)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 09:29 AM
Squinch (46,506 posts)
35. Only Bernie does. And he does it by SPEAKING OUT! Because his occasional conversations
to reporters are MAGIC! And they really make things happen. No, really.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to Squinch (Reply #35)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 10:31 AM
Maru Kitteh (26,233 posts)
114. And birds landing on podiums is MAGICAL and A SIGN!
It's THE UNIVERSE, DUDE.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to Maru Kitteh (Reply #114)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 11:56 AM
Apollyonus (812 posts)
182. ANd the Pope ambush nt
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to Maru Kitteh (Reply #114)
Wed Feb 20, 2019, 01:35 AM
Grasswire2 (12,828 posts)
305. That it was. I was there.
The 12,000 people in the arena went silent for a moment, and then there was pandemonium. It was a really cool moment in American politics.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to Squinch (Reply #35)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 11:55 AM
Apollyonus (812 posts)
181. lol
You didn't even need the
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to Squinch (Reply #35)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 01:27 PM
allgood33 (1,584 posts)
216. Yeah, that worked out so well for us in 2016.
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to MrsCoffee (Reply #29)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 09:30 AM
Voltaire2 (10,737 posts)
37. On healthcare alone he has transformed
the conversation.
Yes other candidates are talking Medicare for all, but that is because of Sanders 2016 campaign. |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to Voltaire2 (Reply #37)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 09:38 AM
Johnny2X2X (15,479 posts)
49. He was talking that for a decade or more
Also has been talking about a living wage for decades, free college for decades, and getting the rich to pay their fair share. Bernie has a great message.
Why shouldn't he run? |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to Voltaire2 (Reply #37)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 09:46 AM
lapucelle (14,900 posts)
62. Democrat John Conyers introduced his Medicare for All bill HR 676 for the first time in 2002.
Democratic representative Conyers introduced it in every session up to and including the 115th Congress. (It was re-introduced in this session as well.) Even BS was a co-sponsor (although not an original) of Conyers's ground-breaking legislation in 2002.
It's time to stop perpetuating false narratives. Universal coverage has been a core Democratic Party value since 1992. Democrats have introduced Medicare for All legislation (with robust co-sponsorship and support) in every session of Congress for the past 17 years. http://www.medicareforall.org/pages/HR676 |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to lapucelle (Reply #62)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 09:51 AM
MrsCoffee (5,552 posts)
67. Exactly.
Get ready for another frantic spin cycle.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to MrsCoffee (Reply #67)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 09:56 AM
lapucelle (14,900 posts)
75. Every new generation of teenagers is convinced that they invented sex. And they are oh so wrong!
![]() |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to lapucelle (Reply #62)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 10:44 AM
irresistable (989 posts)
123. And almost no one was aware of that. because no candidate made it a centerpiece of their campaign
Only Bernie brought it into the foreground, and now everybody is talking about it.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to irresistable (Reply #123)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 11:00 AM
lapucelle (14,900 posts)
135. Democrats and activists were aware of it.
It's amazing how many people say "nobody knew about it" when they really mean "I didn't know about it".
Present company exclused, of course. |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to lapucelle (Reply #135)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 11:04 AM
irresistable (989 posts)
139. Democrats in general were NOT aware of it.
Which means that it would NEVER happen.
And many centrist Democrats still are opposed to it. Bernie POPULARIZED it. Now we are having a conversation about it. |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to irresistable (Reply #139)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 11:12 AM
lapucelle (14,900 posts)
141. Democrats in general were certainly aware of it, although new voters, political neophytes,
and non-Democrats may not have been.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to lapucelle (Reply #141)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 11:20 AM
irresistable (989 posts)
150. No one was making an effective public case for it.
Which is why it was not being broadly discussed.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to irresistable (Reply #150)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 11:28 AM
lapucelle (14,900 posts)
157. Conyers made an effective public case for 15 years, and it was being broadly discussed
(although perhaps not on facebook and reddit).
"People I know didn't know about it, therefore it didn't exist" is not a cogent argument. |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to lapucelle (Reply #157)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 11:31 AM
irresistable (989 posts)
160. It was so "effective" that a public option was not included in Obamacare.
After Bernie, multiple Democrats have signed on to Medicare for all.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to irresistable (Reply #160)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 11:47 AM
lapucelle (14,900 posts)
170. Politicians who made glib promises caved in 2009.
It's a pity that politicians who stubbornly wanted it all "NOW, NOW, NOW" failed to support Democratic proposals back in 1993-1994.
We probably would have had universal coverage through a single payer system by now, just like we have a $15 an hour minimum wage and free state university tuition here in NYS under "incrementalist" Democratic governor Andrew Cuomo. |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to lapucelle (Reply #170)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 11:53 AM
irresistable (989 posts)
176. Those two events in NYS happened after Bernie popularized those ideas nationwide.
That is why we need people like Bernie and AOC to push the boundaries with a loud voice. Less bold politicians will then come on board.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to irresistable (Reply #176)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 02:38 PM
lapucelle (14,900 posts)
233. The legislation was well in the works long before BS was on the scene.
The bill was drafted in 2015 and Cuomo signed the legislation in April 2016. There was a three year phase-in period that was completed in NYC in 2018.
Damn those incrementalists! And, even if that were not true, post hoc ergo propter hoc is fallacious reasoning at its most egregious. It appears that it takes actual hard work, negotiation, and compromise to actually get the big things done. ![]() |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to lapucelle (Reply #233)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 02:59 PM
irresistable (989 posts)
234. Bernie proposed the $ 15 minimum wage in the Senate July 2015 and was campaigning on it...
and rising in the polls. Cuomo proposed it in Sept 2015.
Bernie ran on Medicare for all, and now many Democrats are on board. I realize that you cannot bear to give Bernie credit for his leadership on this issue. |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to irresistable (Reply #234)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 04:12 PM
lapucelle (14,900 posts)
242. How did BS do with his federal proposal? What was the bill number? Can you link to the legislation
he wrote and passed?
According to you, BS had a 6 month head start on Democrat Andrew Cuomo. Cuomo succeeded where others either failed or talked a lot and did nothing. I like leaders who work hard and actually get things done. ![]() |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to lapucelle (Reply #242)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 05:25 PM
irresistable (989 posts)
273. 15 bucks an hour is becoming the new standard thanks to Bernie...
Ask Jeff Bezos.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to irresistable (Reply #273)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 05:34 PM
lapucelle (14,900 posts)
276. The Amazon workers lost benefits when their minimum wage was raised.
That's why we need savvy, serious experts working on policy, sitting at the negotiating table, and actually fighting for workers rather than those easily played and overly concerned with generating good publicity for their personal brand rather than a good deal for labor.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to lapucelle (Reply #276)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 05:43 PM
irresistable (989 posts)
282. They still have good benefits.....
...and part-timers who don't have benefits have a much higher salary.
Where I live, part timers who don't have benefits went from 11.50 to 15.00 per hour. Other employers in my area have been forced to raise wages in order to compete. |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to irresistable (Reply #282)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 05:50 PM
lapucelle (14,900 posts)
285. It was a zero sum game. What they gained in salary, they lost in benefits.
That's like saying, "Well, the people of Vermont still have a good minimum wage" even though it's not $15 an hour, and the governor who vetoed a raise was re-elected in November.
In NYS, our Democratic governor actually got it done, despite a divided legislature and the ridiculous accusations of "incrementalism". |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to lapucelle (Reply #285)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 05:59 PM
irresistable (989 posts)
287. Not for the part-timers....and not for all of the people who have higher wages at other companies...
because of the competition.
The people who were complaining at Amazon did so because the new people were getting more, not because they were getting less. |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to irresistable (Reply #287)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 06:11 PM
lapucelle (14,900 posts)
289. I'm sure you read that somewhere, but really, "the people who were complaining at Amazon did so
because the new people were getting more, not because they were getting less" doesn't make any sense.
I have a problem with anyone who foments distrust of and disdain for a system of commerce while still maximizing their own personal profits by advertising, marketing, and distributing their products using that system. I have neither respect nor trust for career politicians who choose self interest over principle, yet expect others to walk the walk. |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to lapucelle (Reply #289)
Wed Feb 20, 2019, 12:08 AM
irresistable (989 posts)
299. My information is first hand.
I know multiple people who work at Amazon.
The people that I know who have worked there a while started at 10hr and had worked their way up to 12hr and then suddenly everyone is getting 15. Some, not all, resent that. I also know people who just started there who love it. Amazon is constantly expanding and they promote from within. "I have a problem with anyone who foments distrust of and disdain for a system of commerce while still maximizing their own personal profits by advertising, marketing, and distributing their products using that system. " What the hell is that about? |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to irresistable (Reply #299)
Wed Feb 20, 2019, 07:58 AM
lapucelle (14,900 posts)
321. Ah, so your "evidence" is anecdotal and based on "multiple people"
with whom you are personally acquainted from Amazon's workforce of 500,000+, and their primary complaint concerning wages is that the new people are making too much money too quickly. Got it.
I have a problem with anyone who foments distrust of and disdain for a system of commerce while still maximizing their own personal profits by advertising, marketing, and distributing their products using that system.
is a clear statement written in standard English. Those who decry the practices of a business entity run the risk of having their integrity questioned when they partner with that entity precisely because those very practices will make them the most money, in the shortest time, with the least effort. And rightfully so. |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to lapucelle (Reply #321)
Wed Feb 20, 2019, 09:04 AM
irresistable (989 posts)
323. Are you as condescending in the real world as you are online?
First, you sneer that my opinions on Amazon "don't make sense" and imagine that I must have "read that somewhere" (which I also have, BTW). Then you also deride my personal experience.
Your opinion apparently flows from your omniscience. As for your "clear statement", who precisely do you imagine fits that description? |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to irresistable (Reply #323)
Wed Feb 20, 2019, 09:31 AM
lapucelle (14,900 posts)
324. Many people find data and empirical evidence more reliable than personal anecdotes
in assessing an argument. I am among them.
Similarly, many people fit the description, including (but not limited to) anti-Amazon protestors who hold Amazon Prime accounts and high profile Amazon critics (Donald Trump among them) who peddle their wares via the retail giant in order to more fully line their pockets. If the shoe fits, wear it, be it a Lobb wingtip, a Doc Marten boot, or the brandless generic sneaker chosen for you by committee. |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to lapucelle (Reply #324)
Wed Feb 20, 2019, 09:49 AM
irresistable (989 posts)
325. So, actual human experiences are of no use to you. You dismiss those out of hand.
You view the world from afar.
I am not an Amazon critic. I see them providing opportunity to small business owners and self published authors while pressuring their local competition to raise salaries. I also believe in keeping pressure on them |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to irresistable (Reply #325)
Wed Feb 20, 2019, 10:10 AM
lapucelle (14,900 posts)
333. Wait...what? Actual human experiences are of no use to me?
Did you really just write that? All because I don't find idiosyncratic anecdotal evidence in support of a dubious claim convincing?
That's a terrible thing to say to or about someone, especially to or about an allied stranger whose only fault was besting you in a debate. SMH. ![]() |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to lapucelle (Reply #333)
Wed Feb 20, 2019, 10:19 AM
irresistable (989 posts)
334. You dismissed my personal experience as irrelevant.
I am accurately describing your behavior with me.
Since you provided no evidence whatsoever for YOUR position...How exactly did you best me in a debate? Condescension is a poor debate strategy. |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to irresistable (Reply #273)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 05:43 PM
lapucelle (14,900 posts)
283. I'll take your response to mean, "There was no successful federal proposal, and the governor of VT
Last edited Tue Feb 19, 2019, 06:23 PM - Edit history (1) who vetoed a raise in the minimum wage was re-elected in November".
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to irresistable (Reply #234)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 04:59 PM
awesomerwb1 (4,087 posts)
264. Do you have the bill number?
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to lapucelle (Reply #62)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 01:08 PM
Voltaire2 (10,737 posts)
207. When did Conyers run a national campaign?
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to Voltaire2 (Reply #207)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 02:13 PM
lapucelle (14,900 posts)
231. Why would that matter? The uninformed are the uninformed, whether it's about
who is or isn't writing important legislation, who is or isn't missing important votes, or who is or isn't working with the military industrial complex on trillion dollar pork-laden boondoggles that constituents oppose.
![]() |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to lapucelle (Reply #231)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 04:35 PM
Voltaire2 (10,737 posts)
246. Because what Sanders did changed the discussion.
By making Medicare for all the central theme of his national campaign, and by demonstrating that voters were ready to support this sort of major reform, now almost all of the current candidates are promoting something very similar.
Prior to 2016 the current wisdom was that only incremental regulation of the private healthcare system was a viable platform. |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to Voltaire2 (Reply #246)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 05:19 PM
lapucelle (14,900 posts)
272. It wasn't the theme of his national campaign. BS didn't have a senate version of Medicare for All
ready to introduce when Conyers introduced his house version for the 9th time in January 2017.
The last BS campaign theme primarily concerned the evils of both the millionaire class and established career politicians who talk a lot, make a lot of money for themselves, and get little to nothing done for the people who were unwise enough to trust them. ![]() |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to lapucelle (Reply #272)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 06:43 PM
Voltaire2 (10,737 posts)
295. Lulzd.
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to Voltaire2 (Reply #295)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 07:33 PM
lapucelle (14,900 posts)
297. I always ask myself, "Who does that?"
Now I know.
![]() |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to lapucelle (Reply #297)
Wed Feb 20, 2019, 01:36 PM
Voltaire2 (10,737 posts)
362. When a discussion becomes mindless
argumentation I Lulzd.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to lapucelle (Reply #62)
Fri Feb 22, 2019, 02:18 PM
George II (67,782 posts)
364. John Dingell Sr. introduced his version for the first time in 1943.
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to Voltaire2 (Reply #37)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 09:52 AM
Squinch (46,506 posts)
68. Yes! He JUMPED on that bandwagon! He did it with CONVICTION!
And then he SPOKE OUT about stuff! And LED by signing onto the legislation written by others.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to Squinch (Reply #68)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 11:13 AM
lapucelle (14,900 posts)
143. .....
![]() |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to Voltaire2 (Reply #37)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 11:59 AM
Apollyonus (812 posts)
185. Only ONE Democrat
has achieved any legislation regarding Health Care. That was President Obama.
Guess who wanted to primary President Obama in 2012 ..... |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to Apollyonus (Reply #185)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 03:34 PM
Sugarcoated (7,479 posts)
240. Look at that beautiful lineup
![]() |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to Sugarcoated (Reply #240)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 04:22 PM
Apollyonus (812 posts)
245. smile .. I love the lineup too
![]() |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to Voltaire2 (Reply #37)
Wed Feb 20, 2019, 10:45 AM
Demsrule86 (65,368 posts)
340. Medicare for all will be used to demonize us...consider polling shows that
when folks learn they won't get to keep workplace insurance, only 17% support it. A pubic option and improving the ACA is the way to win.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to Voltaire2 (Reply #37)
Fri Feb 22, 2019, 02:19 PM
George II (67,782 posts)
365. Not true. Democrats have been talking about it for more than 75 years.
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to George II (Reply #365)
Fri Feb 22, 2019, 04:23 PM
Voltaire2 (10,737 posts)
366. A bit late to the party.
The “wisdom” of party leaders of the 90s and up to the Sanders campaign of 2016 was that “Medicare for All” was too far left and no serious presidential campaign could run on it.
Now almost all the candidates are pushing it. |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 09:16 AM
NRaleighLiberal (57,393 posts)
16. Meh
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to NRaleighLiberal (Reply #16)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 11:22 AM
NatBurner (2,640 posts)
151. this one
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to NRaleighLiberal (Reply #16)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 11:43 AM
GoCubsGo (30,800 posts)
167. Yep.
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 09:17 AM
DontBooVote (901 posts)
17. Auto-trash by keyword. Oh, on edit, ... and trash thread when one slips through the filters.
Last edited Tue Feb 19, 2019, 10:01 AM - Edit history (2) |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 09:17 AM
mainstreetonce (4,178 posts)
18. Joe
......
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to mainstreetonce (Reply #18)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 10:29 AM
Gothmog (124,475 posts)
108. That was my second choice after Beto
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 09:20 AM
Kurt V. (5,624 posts)
19. fine
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tech This message was self-deleted by its author.
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 09:21 AM
backtoblue (10,912 posts)
21. Welcome
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 09:21 AM
MrsCoffee (5,552 posts)
22. Chariness.
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 09:21 AM
malchickiwick (1,391 posts)
23. Bemused
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 09:23 AM
cally (21,452 posts)
24. Sexist
The bernie bros will come out again with their ignorant sexism
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to cally (Reply #24)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 03:25 PM
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin (95,139 posts)
237. Looks like some came out in the comments section of a WA PO article on the topice
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 09:23 AM
rzemanfl (29,130 posts)
25. DU (if that's a word) gives him something no other candidate is
afforded. Think about it. That's all I'm going to say.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 09:23 AM
Squinch (46,506 posts)
26. Ugh.
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 09:24 AM
Happyhippychick (8,379 posts)
27. Here's 4
Ready for a woman
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 09:24 AM
Soph0571 (9,685 posts)
28. Bollocks
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to Soph0571 (Reply #28)
Wed Feb 20, 2019, 11:14 AM
WoonTars (694 posts)
350. Yes indeed, he is the dog's bollocks!!
#FeelTheBern
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to WoonTars (Reply #350)
Wed Feb 20, 2019, 12:00 PM
Soph0571 (9,685 posts)
358. Lol
Or the dogs breakfast.....
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 09:25 AM
The Velveteen Ocelot (105,721 posts)
30. Meh.
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 09:26 AM
revmclaren (1,946 posts)
31. Gadfly.
![]() |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 09:26 AM
Demit (11,238 posts)
32. rollseyes
:rollseyes:
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 09:26 AM
crazytown (7,277 posts)
33. Nausea
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to crazytown (Reply #33)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 10:57 AM
grantcart (52,534 posts)
132. +1
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 09:27 AM
Voltaire2 (10,737 posts)
34. Excellent
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 09:29 AM
Rebl2 (9,855 posts)
36. NO!
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 09:30 AM
shanny (6,709 posts)
38. Yahoo
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 09:30 AM
apcalc (4,370 posts)
39. Trumpwins
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to apcalc (Reply #39)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 09:41 AM
True Dough (14,769 posts)
53. GAWD!
I sure hope not!!!
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 09:30 AM
2naSalit (67,832 posts)
40. Bernedout.
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to 2naSalit (Reply #40)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 10:22 AM
LakeArenal (25,327 posts)
102. Best answer. Me, too..
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to 2naSalit (Reply #40)
Wed Feb 20, 2019, 05:31 AM
GoneOffShore (16,847 posts)
317. You got it.
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 09:31 AM
brooklynite (84,527 posts)
41. Donuts!
I was thinking of going down to the Farmer's market to buy apple cider donuts. Bernie's announcement hasn't changed that.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to brooklynite (Reply #41)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 09:43 AM
True Dough (14,769 posts)
56. Carbohydrates
Sugar high!
Enjoy those donuts. |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 09:34 AM
backabby-blue (144 posts)
42. Sexism
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 09:35 AM
samplegirl (9,896 posts)
43. Don't
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 09:35 AM
LongtimeAZDem (4,494 posts)
44. Afraid
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 09:36 AM
titaniumsalute (4,742 posts)
45. Is "UGG" a word? Or an utterance? Either way that is my opinion
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to titaniumsalute (Reply #45)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 09:43 AM
True Dough (14,769 posts)
58. I believe it's
ugh!
But I get your sentiment. |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 09:37 AM
ecstatic (30,607 posts)
46. Suspicious...
Is he running because he sincerely wants to, or because the NRA or a Russian agent told him to? Look at his voting record with regard to Russia, sanctions, and the NRA.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to ecstatic (Reply #46)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 09:58 AM
exboyfil (17,530 posts)
81. I am starting to feel that way as well
and I voted for for him in the Iowa caucus the last time.
He is just another stalking horse like Stein and probably him last time. |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to ecstatic (Reply #46)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 10:00 AM
Maru Kitteh (26,233 posts)
88. Is there any difference between the NRA and Russia anymore?
It does smell fishy.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to ecstatic (Reply #46)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 01:28 PM
uponit7771 (88,365 posts)
218. +1, The Russians officially help him in the primaries last time and he wont release
... his .. .FULL ... freakin tax returns.
I don't know why everyone else isn't ... MORE ... suspicious !!! |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 09:37 AM
still_one (86,957 posts)
47. *******
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to still_one (Reply #47)
Wed Feb 20, 2019, 04:29 AM
oasis (48,720 posts)
314. +1
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 09:37 AM
California_Republic (1,826 posts)
48. Welcomeing-all
Ha. I cheated a bit
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to California_Republic (Reply #48)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 09:47 AM
True Dough (14,769 posts)
65. It was a long read
but I think we can find it in our hearts to forgive you.
![]() |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Reply #65)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 10:43 AM
California_Republic (1,826 posts)
121. My apologies true It did drag on in a bit. 😀
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to California_Republic (Reply #48)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 10:56 AM
California_Republic (1,826 posts)
131. Trust. ( after more thought)
Trust the process. We will select the best. Anyone can try out.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 09:39 AM
romana (765 posts)
50. Disgusted /nt
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 09:40 AM
democratisphere (17,235 posts)
51. NOT!
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 09:41 AM
mikeysnot (4,717 posts)
52. Yes....!
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 09:41 AM
Chemisse (30,514 posts)
54. Disgusted
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 09:42 AM
KansasKali (105 posts)
55. Whelp
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 09:43 AM
LonePirate (12,784 posts)
57. Irritated
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 09:45 AM
disillusioned73 (2,872 posts)
59. Awesome...
![]() |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 09:45 AM
Moostache (9,715 posts)
60. Ambivalent.
The entire cramped field has me getting very nervous that an internal blood bath is going to erupt and leave our candidate wounded and vulnerable to Trump's asinine campaign of name calling and BS.
I have only one concern in 2020 - defeating Donald Trump, period. The reason? If we do not, the SCOTUS will be 7-2 for a generation+ by 2024. The ONLY thing that matters in our primaries is determining who is the best candidate to defeat Trump. Nothing else is even close and yet I see the threads already attacking the same old purity / not good enough with <fill in subset of party here> nonsense. If we do not recognize the criticality of this time, we will lose, period. We cannot let that happen. |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to Moostache (Reply #60)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 09:56 AM
happybird (3,652 posts)
76. +1
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 09:45 AM
jalan48 (13,533 posts)
61. Fantastic!
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 09:46 AM
ginnyinWI (17,276 posts)
63. Ugh. nt
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 09:47 AM
Evergreen Emerald (13,005 posts)
64. suspicious
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 09:50 AM
Shrek (3,749 posts)
66. Motivated
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 09:52 AM
CaptainTruth (5,401 posts)
69. Disappointed
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 09:52 AM
aikoaiko (33,180 posts)
70. Welcome!
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 09:53 AM
mulsh (2,959 posts)
71. pathetic
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to mulsh (Reply #71)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 09:57 AM
Phoenix61 (14,932 posts)
77. +1nt
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 09:54 AM
tammywammy (26,582 posts)
72. Pass
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 09:55 AM
LAS14 (12,917 posts)
74. Ambivalent.
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 09:57 AM
Tom Rinaldo (22,568 posts)
78. Fine. n/t
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 09:57 AM
The Blue Flower (5,078 posts)
79. Good
nt
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 09:58 AM
redstateblues (10,554 posts)
80. Barf
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 09:59 AM
zipplewrath (16,530 posts)
82. Okay
I actually think he may be in for a bit of shock. An awful lot of his support was from people who felt like they didn't have alot of other choices and were being taken a bit for granted. That isn't going to be true this time. And it doesn't look like he'll be running just against and HRC type candidate. There will be several "lanes" as we call them today and his may be way more narrow than he realizes.
History has a cruel track record for candidates that want a second swing at the ball. I just hope he is prepared for that. |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 09:59 AM
OregonBlue (7,333 posts)
83. Bored.
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 09:59 AM
lapucelle (14,900 posts)
84. Bring
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to lapucelle (Reply #84)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 09:59 AM
lapucelle (14,900 posts)
85. it
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to lapucelle (Reply #85)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 10:00 AM
lapucelle (14,900 posts)
87. on.
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to lapucelle (Reply #87)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 10:11 AM
True Dough (14,769 posts)
95. Creative end-run around the only rule in this thread!
But you get bonus points for creativity!
![]() |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Reply #95)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 11:00 AM
lapucelle (14,900 posts)
137. ...
![]() |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 10:00 AM
underpants (174,604 posts)
86. Punxsutawney
I just KNEW he has going to see his shadow again this year.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to underpants (Reply #86)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 11:25 AM
Squinch (46,506 posts)
155. LOL!
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 10:01 AM
riverine (516 posts)
89. Fingerwag.
If it is not a word it should be one.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to riverine (Reply #89)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 10:30 AM
Maru Kitteh (26,233 posts)
112. Flyinglipspittle?
It should be a word too, lol.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 10:02 AM
Spider Jerusalem (21,786 posts)
90. Meh. (n/t)
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Post removed
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 10:05 AM
comradebillyboy (9,718 posts)
92. Nauseous
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 10:07 AM
G_j (40,341 posts)
93. Democracy
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 10:09 AM
jrthin (4,703 posts)
94. UGH!!!!!!!!
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 10:16 AM
AirmensMom (14,258 posts)
96. F**k
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 10:16 AM
Rene (1,183 posts)
97. stinks
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 10:17 AM
Blue_Tires (55,445 posts)
98. Apprehensive
Even before he officially announced his nutbar supporters were working overtime on Twitter smearing Beto as a corporatist, Booker as a neoliberal, Warren as a Republican and Harris as a cop who isn't even black and a whore who slept her way into office...
![]() So only God know how much worse the rhetoric will get now that he's officially in the race. |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to Blue_Tires (Reply #98)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 02:27 PM
Blue_Tires (55,445 posts)
232. case in point:
Last edited Tue Feb 19, 2019, 06:45 PM - Edit history (1) |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 10:18 AM
JHB (36,118 posts)
99. Counterproductive
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 10:20 AM
missingthebigdog (1,220 posts)
100. Aggravated.
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 10:22 AM
dalton99a (73,748 posts)
101. Why?
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 10:22 AM
Joe941 (2,848 posts)
103. excited.
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 10:24 AM
Tribalceltic (1,000 posts)
104. Disgusted
One more Russian backed wannabe.
Worse than that are all the trolls and berniebots this will bring out. This country is not ready to go that far left! Bernie running will only divide the democrats and make Trump a 2 term president, or Emperor for life! |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 10:24 AM
MontanaMama (21,235 posts)
105. No.
Please no.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 10:26 AM
CentralMass (14,525 posts)
106. Approval.
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 10:28 AM
Gothmog (124,475 posts)
107. Beto
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to Gothmog (Reply #107)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 10:59 AM
dalton99a (73,748 posts)
134. I sure hope he runs
Sick of 2016
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 10:29 AM
gibraltar72 (7,027 posts)
109. Revultion.
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 10:30 AM
Gidney N Cloyd (18,843 posts)
110. Distraction.
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 10:30 AM
Odoreida (1,549 posts)
111. Feh
![]() |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 10:30 AM
cornball 24 (1,401 posts)
113. YAWN!
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 10:32 AM
Polly Hennessey (5,270 posts)
115. Yawn and bored.
Sorry, two words and already said by those quicker than me.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 10:33 AM
MrGrieves (315 posts)
116. over
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 10:33 AM
cwydro (48,588 posts)
117. Laughable.
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 10:38 AM
pamdb (1,286 posts)
118. bernie
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOO |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 10:40 AM
honest.abe (7,127 posts)
119. NoMoreBS
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 10:42 AM
ebbie15644 (1,134 posts)
120. uninterested
we have excellent democratic candidates
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 10:44 AM
Hortensis (55,127 posts)
122. Frightened.
Not of him directly, of the rise of right-wing nationalism and authoritarianism that his candidacy assisted in 2016 and may again in 2020.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 10:45 AM
agingdem (6,254 posts)
124. used
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 10:46 AM
rgbecker (4,756 posts)
125. GREAT!
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 10:46 AM
David__77 (21,448 posts)
126. Good.
...
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 10:50 AM
YessirAtsaFact (2,064 posts)
127. Disgust
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 10:51 AM
snowybirdie (4,408 posts)
128. MEH!
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 10:54 AM
Shrike47 (6,913 posts)
129. Depressed
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 10:55 AM
windje (65 posts)
130. Enough
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 10:58 AM
Stare Decisis (229 posts)
133. Skeptical
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 11:00 AM
W_HAMILTON (6,488 posts)
136. Ugh.
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 11:02 AM
SaveOurDemocracy (4,287 posts)
138. WHY???
We have a surplus of great DEMOCRATS running. Wish he'd step out of the limelight and lend his support to our lineup.
So now, I'm rooting for Joe Biden to jump in! |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 11:09 AM
lunamagica (9,967 posts)
140. disgusted
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 11:12 AM
backscatter712 (26,354 posts)
142. Meh.
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 11:14 AM
milestogo (14,239 posts)
144. Delighted.
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 11:14 AM
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin (95,139 posts)
145. Meh
He's yesterday's news
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 11:14 AM
Thekaspervote (28,662 posts)
146. Ughhh!!!
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 11:16 AM
aeromanKC (3,061 posts)
147. NO!!
If two words, HELL NO!!
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 11:19 AM
WeekiWater (3,259 posts)
148. Misguided. NT
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 11:20 AM
SCRUBDASHRUB (7,248 posts)
149. Narcissist.
Bernie only cares about burning. He will divide the party again, and we can look forward to another term of Trump.
He just can't help himself. Go the f*** away. |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 11:22 AM
VOX (22,976 posts)
152. Fatigued.
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 11:23 AM
GemDigger (4,301 posts)
153. Whoopie... /s
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 11:25 AM
sakabatou (39,989 posts)
154. Unhappy, now that the Bernie-bros will probably come back
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 11:27 AM
Squinch (46,506 posts)
156. Hey! Check this out! in this thread, there are really only 3 or 4 pro-BS posters, and ALMOST ALL
of them have names that start with "J".
It means nothing, but it's kind of funny. |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 11:31 AM
LEW (1,072 posts)
158. sad
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 11:31 AM
snpsmom (396 posts)
159. no n/t
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 11:34 AM
Tiggeroshii (11,088 posts)
161. Good
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 11:35 AM
DFW (49,995 posts)
162. Do the primaries have an ignore button? n/t
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to DFW (Reply #162)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 11:36 AM
Tiggeroshii (11,088 posts)
163. yes
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 11:37 AM
FakeNoose (27,708 posts)
164. Ohnonotagain!!!!!!!!!!!!!
That's the best word in my repertoire.
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 11:38 AM
Basic LA (805 posts)
165. Nader (as in Ralph)
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 11:40 AM
GoCubsGo (30,800 posts)
166. Yeeeech.
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 11:46 AM
WheelWalker (8,417 posts)
168. Sigh
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 11:47 AM
MurrayDelph (4,983 posts)
169. Anachronistic
It's no longer his time.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 11:47 AM
lilactime (657 posts)
171. Numb
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 11:51 AM
intheozone (1,066 posts)
172. Opposed. nt
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 11:51 AM
Desert grandma (751 posts)
173. Indifferent
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 11:52 AM
sarcasmo (22,776 posts)
174. Ugh!
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Apollyonus This message was self-deleted by its author.
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 11:53 AM
Power 2 the People (2,437 posts)
177. Inspired!!
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 11:54 AM
OhZone (3,198 posts)
178. Compromat
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 11:54 AM
Dyedinthewoolliberal (14,381 posts)
179. Verklempt!
![]() |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 11:54 AM
Skidmore (37,364 posts)
180. Spoiler.
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 11:57 AM
lagomorph777 (30,613 posts)
183. Pleased.
We need plenty of mass on the left to separate the Dems from the Richpublicans.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 11:58 AM
frogmarch (12,027 posts)
184. No. nt
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 12:04 PM
beachbum bob (10,437 posts)
186. non-democrat
its one word with hyphen
to me not its all ego as 2016 was. Making it easy for GOP to keep the Whitehouse |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 12:04 PM
Kentonio (4,377 posts)
187. Delighted
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 12:05 PM
KPN (14,537 posts)
188. Okay.
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 12:15 PM
Devil Child (2,728 posts)
189. Delighted
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 12:18 PM
DavidDvorkin (18,836 posts)
190. Repelled.
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 12:23 PM
theophilus (3,734 posts)
191. Sad
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 12:25 PM
Guy Whitey Corngood (25,711 posts)
192. Scrumtrulescent! nt
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 12:25 PM
Kingofalldems (36,811 posts)
193. Trolled.
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 12:26 PM
ZeroSomeBrains (638 posts)
194. Happy
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 12:27 PM
Peachhead22 (1,072 posts)
195. Cool
I may not support him this time around. There are so many great people to choose from. But I'm glad he's adding his voice. The more the merrier. A diversity of opinions to pick and choose from only makes us stronger.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 12:29 PM
Gothmog (124,475 posts)
196. Philadelphia
I was a delegate to the national convention and my experience with sanders delegates will affect who I support.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 12:32 PM
AkFemDem (1,468 posts)
197. Disgusted.
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 12:37 PM
ProudLib72 (17,984 posts)
198. Exasperated
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 12:54 PM
True Dough (14,769 posts)
199. Well, the spectrum of emotions is pretty well represented above
It's going to be an interesting journey to the nomination.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Reply #199)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 01:36 PM
frazzled (18,381 posts)
223. If emotions ranging from "meh" to "disgusted" can be called a gamut
There is a tiny smattering of "delighted"s, but from a scan of the responses, I'd say the gamut is a fairly narrow range, all in the negative territory. The bern seems to have been extinguished, at least on this (perhaps anomalous) discussion forum. Seems like DU is just not that into him anymore.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to frazzled (Reply #223)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 01:48 PM
True Dough (14,769 posts)
225. I wasn't claiming that the majority are backing Bernie
I too get the impression that his support here at the DU is diminished compared to 2016. But there's still a substantial number of posters here who are either strongly in his camp or leaning toward more positive than negative. To dismiss it as a non-factor would be premature, I'd say.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 12:56 PM
Bev54 (7,410 posts)
200. Done
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 12:57 PM
java108 (129 posts)
201. Shitstorm
as in, there's a shitstorm every time his name is mentioned here. Just look at today, for example.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 12:59 PM
yortsed snacilbuper (7,939 posts)
202. independent
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 01:00 PM
Loki Liesmith (4,597 posts)
203. Meh
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 01:03 PM
blackdove78 (35 posts)
204. Gross
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 01:05 PM
Runningdawg (4,083 posts)
205. Pathetic
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 01:08 PM
Delmette2.0 (3,584 posts)
206. Yes!
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 01:09 PM
leftynyc (26,060 posts)
208. Disgusted
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 01:09 PM
CherokeeDem (3,697 posts)
209. Disgusted. nt
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 01:21 PM
TJKay (27 posts)
210. Whatever nt
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 01:23 PM
LuvLoogie (6,206 posts)
211. Doh!
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 01:24 PM
fishwax (29,045 posts)
212. unsurprised
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 01:26 PM
allgood33 (1,584 posts)
213. Disgusted!
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 01:26 PM
Lucid Dreamer (562 posts)
214. Enuff!
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 01:27 PM
Panich52 (5,829 posts)
215. Apathy
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 01:28 PM
CrossingTheRubicon (731 posts)
217. One photo that sums up how I feel about his announcement:
![]() |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to CrossingTheRubicon (Reply #217)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 04:49 PM
Kahuna7 (2,531 posts)
258. Woo hoo! nt
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 01:32 PM
SammyWinstonJack (44,095 posts)
221. Cool
Beans
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 01:32 PM
Puzzledtraveller (5,937 posts)
222. Excited!
If he maintains his positions from 2016, oppose things like TPP, monopolies like Amazon, and oppose open borders which he laid out his opposition to them in a 2015 article now missing from his website which I archived.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 01:42 PM
LovingA2andMI (7,006 posts)
224. PISSED....
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 01:49 PM
PubliusEnigma (1,583 posts)
226. EGO
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 01:50 PM
Vinca (49,039 posts)
227. Nervous.
If he is in the primary running as a Democrat and has no intention of an independent run it's fine by me. If his end game is a third party run if he loses the Democratic primary, then I'm scared to death. Anyone who runs as a third party candidate and is "leftish" will hand the White House to the orange slob for another 4 years (assuming he's not in prison). I doubt Bernie would do that, but we'll still have the Green Party and others to worry about. In any case, as for the Democratic primary, the more the merrier. It will shake out to a preferred candidate eventually and no one should be discouraged from running.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 01:53 PM
guillaumeb (42,641 posts)
228. Good. eom
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 01:53 PM
wcmagumba (2,661 posts)
229. Just a money maker for him...
and he could care less for the Dems or if drumph wins again...
russian stooge.... oops, too many words... |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 01:53 PM
elleng (121,959 posts)
230. Fine
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 03:00 PM
MaryMagdaline (6,627 posts)
235. Ambivalent
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 03:09 PM
BigDemVoter (4,098 posts)
236. Don't.
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 03:28 PM
mvd (64,658 posts)
238. Fan
But his age really is a concern. I kind of prefer he stay in the Senate as much as I like him. And we have other progressive candidates this time.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 03:32 PM
Sugarcoated (7,479 posts)
239. Loser
IOW, not gonna be the Democratic candidate.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 03:47 PM
Yosemito (648 posts)
241. Expected
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 04:14 PM
Different Drummer (6,136 posts)
243. Didn't want to seem unoriginal, but...
meh.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to Different Drummer (Reply #243)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 04:21 PM
True Dough (14,769 posts)
244. Running out of original options at this point
so don't be too hard on yourself!
![]() |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 04:39 PM
Books_Tea_Alone (252 posts)
247. Untruthful
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 04:44 PM
Arazi (5,572 posts)
248. Fine. I will say I truly doubt he'll be successful this time around
But I think the more the merrier. Let the best candidate win
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 04:45 PM
betsuni (21,706 posts)
249. Establishment
We're going to have to see that fucking word every day again. Negativity, insinuations that everyone's corrupt. How can we do this again.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to betsuni (Reply #249)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 04:46 PM
Cha (282,443 posts)
252. lol
![]() |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to betsuni (Reply #249)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 04:56 PM
True Dough (14,769 posts)
262. You're opposed to negativity
but what about the tone of your post, betsuni?
![]() |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Reply #262)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 05:02 PM
betsuni (21,706 posts)
266. Hey man, I'm not the one going around calling everyone ideologically bankrupt elites.
He started it!
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to betsuni (Reply #266)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 05:43 PM
True Dough (14,769 posts)
281. Fair enough
Just try to remain the bigger person, all right?
![]() |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Reply #281)
Wed Feb 20, 2019, 08:08 AM
betsuni (21,706 posts)
322. No, what I receive are boring lies and personal attacks and what I gave back are
facts and sarcasm based on the bullshit I am dished out.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 04:46 PM
ProfessorGAC (56,832 posts)
251. Okay
But at this point in time, who cares?
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to ProfessorGAC (Reply #251)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 04:58 PM
True Dough (14,769 posts)
263. Well,
200+ posts into this thread -- and with MANY other Bernie-themed threads created here on the DU today -- it seems that a lot of people still care, one way or the other.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Reply #263)
Wed Feb 20, 2019, 04:59 AM
ProfessorGAC (56,832 posts)
315. And I Consider That Problematic
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to ProfessorGAC (Reply #315)
Wed Feb 20, 2019, 06:22 AM
True Dough (14,769 posts)
319. Most definitely
Bernie is such a polarizing figure. You'd think he'd see that and step back for the good of the party, but he's not a member of the party, is he?
Some people have pointed out, rightly, I think, that Bernie's "radical" positions from 2016 are now mostly mainstream ideas. He put them on the agenda and deserves credit for that. He also raised a big pile of money immediately after declaring his candidacy yesterday. Despite that, he'll never be president, IMO. |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 04:47 PM
standingtall (2,740 posts)
254. Predictable
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 04:47 PM
InAbLuEsTaTe (23,818 posts)
255. Elated!!
Bernie & Elizabeth 2020!!!
![]() |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 04:48 PM
Kahuna7 (2,531 posts)
256. Ugh.
![]() |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 04:48 PM
wryter2000 (44,747 posts)
257. Noooooooooooooo! n/t
n/t
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 04:53 PM
Glimmer of Hope (5,823 posts)
259. Blah.
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 04:55 PM
awesomerwb1 (4,087 posts)
260. Vomit
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 04:56 PM
Freethinker65 (7,856 posts)
261. Disappointed
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 05:00 PM
Zen Democrat (5,898 posts)
265. The more the merrier!
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 05:03 PM
Clash City Rocker (2,902 posts)
267. Putin
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 05:04 PM
Historic NY (36,508 posts)
268. LOSER
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 05:06 PM
Doremus (7,251 posts)
269. HOORAY
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 05:07 PM
DeminPennswoods (14,757 posts)
270. Go ahead
I don't think he should be able to use the Democratic Party for his ambitions, though. He can't just decide to be a registered Democrat when it's convenient for things like being on the debate stage or easy access to a ballot line in every state.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 05:12 PM
blitzen (4,572 posts)
271. Disdainful
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 05:28 PM
Metatron (1,258 posts)
274. Meh
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 05:34 PM
DarthDem (5,138 posts)
277. Annoyed
But I don't think it will matter. I hope not.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 05:35 PM
peacefreak2.0 (906 posts)
278. Nope.
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 05:40 PM
polmaven (9,463 posts)
279. Scram!!
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 05:42 PM
R B Garr (16,533 posts)
280. NTSA
An acronym....pretty easy to figure out.
![]() |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to R B Garr (Reply #280)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 05:44 PM
True Dough (14,769 posts)
284. I'm gonna take a crack at it
Not This Shit Again!?!
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Reply #284)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 06:32 PM
R B Garr (16,533 posts)
291. Yes!
![]() ![]() |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 05:55 PM
doc03 (32,781 posts)
286. re-elected nt
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 06:03 PM
Apollyonus (812 posts)
288. GoAway nt
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 06:24 PM
lamp_shade (14,359 posts)
290. Aardvark
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 06:37 PM
tavernier (11,192 posts)
292. Divider.
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 06:40 PM
pampango (24,691 posts)
293. Welcome
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 06:42 PM
vercetti2021 (8,691 posts)
294. Fuck
I learned my lesson buying into BernBro horseshit. Again his flock is already starting to attack the Dems. Repeat of shit from 2016
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to vercetti2021 (Reply #294)
Wed Feb 20, 2019, 01:41 AM
Cha (282,443 posts)
308. lol
you win.
![]() ![]() |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 06:53 PM
ploppy (2,127 posts)
296. Bloviator
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Tue Feb 19, 2019, 08:29 PM
SidDithers (44,228 posts)
298. Pfffft..nt
Sid
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Wed Feb 20, 2019, 12:19 AM
highplainsdem (42,197 posts)
300. Disgusted.
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Wed Feb 20, 2019, 12:26 AM
sprinkleeninow (18,345 posts)
301. Below in Franglais:
Blasé.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Wed Feb 20, 2019, 12:29 AM
RandySF (41,411 posts)
302. Dreadful
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Wed Feb 20, 2019, 12:37 AM
egduj (750 posts)
303. Drama
![]() |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Wed Feb 20, 2019, 12:46 AM
akraven (1,975 posts)
304. Sad.
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Wed Feb 20, 2019, 01:36 AM
Demonaut (8,627 posts)
306. wasted
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Wed Feb 20, 2019, 01:37 AM
roamer65 (33,440 posts)
307. Withdraw.
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Wed Feb 20, 2019, 01:41 AM
Demovictory9 (29,770 posts)
309. scared
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Wed Feb 20, 2019, 01:59 AM
Celerity (34,379 posts)
310. Pavlovian
![]() |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Wed Feb 20, 2019, 02:30 AM
garybeck (9,864 posts)
311. Happy
His voice is important. Many of his good ideas have been adopted by other candidates.
I doesn't matter who gets the nomination. I will vote for the Democratic candidate no matter who it is. He did not make Hillary lose. That is just pure bs. People should stop infighting about this. We need to really behind the candidate who wins the nomination. Period. |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Wed Feb 20, 2019, 03:58 AM
scardycat (169 posts)
312. How can he run as a Democrat if he isnt one??? n/t
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Wed Feb 20, 2019, 04:14 AM
workinclasszero (28,270 posts)
313. Fine
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Wed Feb 20, 2019, 05:18 AM
MyNameGoesHere (7,638 posts)
316. President Trump
Yeah that's two words but that is what's going to happen.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Wed Feb 20, 2019, 05:37 AM
ananda (27,255 posts)
318. Fine
No problem
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Wed Feb 20, 2019, 06:31 AM
scarytomcat (1,706 posts)
320. pleased
he brings many things to the table
i want to hear what he has to say |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Wed Feb 20, 2019, 09:54 AM
BootinUp (43,834 posts)
326. Sad. Nt
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Wed Feb 20, 2019, 09:56 AM
lark (21,820 posts)
327. Unconcerned
The left wing of the Democratic party is well represented without him. Dislike that PUtin and drumpf will use him to hurt the party, but think the other contenders are so strong he won't set the agenda this time around.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Wed Feb 20, 2019, 09:57 AM
Autumn (42,325 posts)
328. Happy.
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Wed Feb 20, 2019, 09:58 AM
Cha (282,443 posts)
329. Divisive.
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Wed Feb 20, 2019, 10:01 AM
librechik (30,506 posts)
330. fuck.
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Wed Feb 20, 2019, 10:05 AM
GitRDun (1,846 posts)
331. ugh
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Wed Feb 20, 2019, 10:08 AM
PBC_Democrat (395 posts)
332. Concerned
worried that we will devolve into a race to the far-far left and lose the center of the electorate0
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Wed Feb 20, 2019, 10:24 AM
jiminvegas (104 posts)
335. Notademocrat
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to jiminvegas (Reply #335)
Wed Feb 20, 2019, 10:46 AM
True Dough (14,769 posts)
341. Further analysis
indicates your reply to this thread is three words disguised as one. Jiminvegas, you're better than that!
![]() |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Wed Feb 20, 2019, 10:26 AM
SKKY (10,976 posts)
336. Meh
But as I said earlier, whether it's Bernie Sanders or Barney the Dinosaur, I'm 100% "all in" for whoever the Democratic candidate is.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to SKKY (Reply #336)
Wed Feb 20, 2019, 10:48 AM
True Dough (14,769 posts)
342. Barney the Dinosaur versus Trump would be quite a spectacle!
A real "love overcomes hate" story...
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Wed Feb 20, 2019, 10:40 AM
Doodley (8,748 posts)
337. Traitor
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Wed Feb 20, 2019, 10:42 AM
Demsrule86 (65,368 posts)
338. Angry.
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Wed Feb 20, 2019, 10:43 AM
Sucha NastyWoman (2,516 posts)
339. Democratic
Even though I probably won’t vote for him in the primaries.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
lillypaddle This message was self-deleted by its author.
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Wed Feb 20, 2019, 10:50 AM
lillypaddle (9,501 posts)
344. Sick
![]() |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to lillypaddle (Reply #344)
Wed Feb 20, 2019, 10:51 AM
True Dough (14,769 posts)
345. You felt so strongly about it
that you had to post it twice?!?
![]() |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Reply #345)
Wed Feb 20, 2019, 12:15 PM
lillypaddle (9,501 posts)
360. OOPSIE!
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Wed Feb 20, 2019, 11:07 AM
TexasBlueDog (43 posts)
346. Loser
There are only two guaranteed winners against Trump; Michelle or Oprah.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to TexasBlueDog (Reply #346)
Wed Feb 20, 2019, 11:08 AM
True Dough (14,769 posts)
347. How about Michelle AND Oprah
Oprah for V.P.?
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Wed Feb 20, 2019, 11:09 AM
Sparkly (24,085 posts)
348. Geez.
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Wed Feb 20, 2019, 11:13 AM
WoonTars (694 posts)
349. Elated!
Finally a REAL progressive is in the race!!
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Wed Feb 20, 2019, 11:15 AM
sacto95834 (393 posts)
351. I'll Play...
Excited.
The quality of candidates is exceptional so far. I feel the more the merrier; I look forward to hearing ideas from our candidates and evaluating their stance compared to mine. |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Wed Feb 20, 2019, 11:15 AM
Politicub (12,138 posts)
352. Meh
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Wed Feb 20, 2019, 11:17 AM
Anon-C (3,420 posts)
353. Hypervigilant.
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Wed Feb 20, 2019, 11:19 AM
Midwestern Democrat (713 posts)
354. Indifferent
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Wed Feb 20, 2019, 11:27 AM
Peacetrain (22,239 posts)
355. Sigh
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Wed Feb 20, 2019, 11:42 AM
roody (10,842 posts)
356. Joyful
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Wed Feb 20, 2019, 01:01 PM
AncientGeezer (2,146 posts)
361. Fine.
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Wed Feb 20, 2019, 02:08 PM
Ilsa (60,624 posts)
363. Annoyed.
I gave to his campaign several times in 2016. No more $ from me.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to True Dough (Original post)
Fri Feb 22, 2019, 04:31 PM
Skinner (63,645 posts)
367. Locking
Feel free to continue discussion in the Democratic Primaries forum.
https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=forum&id=1287 |
Cannot reply in locked threads