Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

tabatha

(18,795 posts)
Wed Jan 4, 2012, 04:00 PM Jan 2012

Will his New Sanctions on Iran Cost Obama the Presidency?

A sharp drop in the value of the Iranian currency as a result of new American sanctions may sound like good news to hawks in the US. But actually this development may signal ways in which Americans will also be harmed, and Obama may have put a second term in jeopardy, cutting off his nose to spite his face.

An amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act signed by President Obama this past weekend will seek to slap third party sanctions on countries and enterprises that deal with Iran’s central bank. It will go into effect this summer. In effect, the law says that if you buy Iranian petroleum, you cannot do business with American financial institutions. Since the United States is still over a fifth of the world economy, and most institutions with capital need to deal with it, the hope of Congress is that Iran will be left without customers.

...


In short, even Congress’s more severe sanctions and targeting of Iran’s Central Bank are likely to be ultimately ineffective in changing Iranian policy or undermining the regime. The international community will find work-arounds and close US allies like South Korea, facing major economic consequences, will lobby hard for exemptions. Obama, who was forced into this law and had opposed it, has every reason to grant the exemptions. In other instances, the NDAA will cause American will to be tested. It will take a lot of impudence to attempt to impose sanctions on Chinese banks for dealing with Iran, when Chinese finance is so important to propping up the US economy.

...

In signing the NDAA (which also allows the US military to arrest Americans anywhere in the world and to hold them indefinitely without trial), Obama has likely done harm to himself. Iranians will suffer some inconveniences and ordinary people may face real hardship in Iran. But the ayatollahs will still have their billions, and the regime will go on enriching uranium and supporting Syria and Hizbullah. The US, on the other hand, will suffer massive opportunity costs (i.e. it won’t do all kinds of things in the economy that it might have otherwise) from a policy of keeping petroleum prices artificially high by bothering Iran.

http://www.juancole.com/2012/01/will-his-new-sanctions-on-iran-cost-obama-the-presidency.html

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Will his New Sanctions on Iran Cost Obama the Presidency? (Original Post) tabatha Jan 2012 OP
Nope, sanctions are a "middle of the road" approach Motown_Johnny Jan 2012 #1
I have to agree. tabatha Jan 2012 #2
Succinct analysis. nt MADem Jan 2012 #5
It will not hurt his reelection. He made a decision immediately when he became rhett o rick Jan 2012 #3
What is the definition of "American financial institutions"?? rhett o rick Jan 2012 #4
Indirectly they could hurt him because the cost of oil will go up and so gas prices will too. WI_DEM Jan 2012 #6
 

Motown_Johnny

(22,308 posts)
1. Nope, sanctions are a "middle of the road" approach
Wed Jan 4, 2012, 04:16 PM
Jan 2012

and will play well with swing voters.

Romney (and the others) are all out there talking about bombing Iran and not letting them get a nuclear bomb no matter what. Pres. Obama's more measured approach along with the ending of the Iraq war, the killing of bin Laden and the scheduled draw down of troops in Afghanistan give him a huge advantage in this debate.

It can be spun as working to keep America safe without going to war.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
3. It will not hurt his reelection. He made a decision immediately when he became
Wed Jan 4, 2012, 04:27 PM
Jan 2012

President to forgo the left and woo the right of center. It may be just how he roles or it may have been a great strategy. Appealing to the center-right takes those votes from the republicon clown candidate. The center-right will love his hard stand on Iran as well as him signing the NDAA with its tough detention standards (of course only for "real" terrorists). The left of course has no choice, it's either him or a Ralph Nader write-in. In fact, even though the President continues the Patriot Act, domestic spying and signs a bill he knows is wrong (his signing statement as much as says that) some are saying that he stills has 85% support from the left. No, having a tough stand on Iran will win him more votes than he will lose.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
4. What is the definition of "American financial institutions"??
Wed Jan 4, 2012, 04:29 PM
Jan 2012

"In effect, the law says that if you buy Iranian petroleum, you cannot do business with American financial institutions."

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Will his New Sanctions on...