Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

EveHammond13

(2,855 posts)
Wed Feb 27, 2019, 04:15 PM Feb 2019

I feel like Dems could have done a better job organizing and selecting questions

seems unfocused and like they are missing the really big issues

no questions on Epstein. No questions on Broidy. There is so much Cohen must know, but no one is asking.

Plus they really could be doing a better job tying their questions to a larger point or conclusion - as my old boss would ask, "What's the so-what of that?" WHY is this important? What is the bottom line? Kind of missing for the benefit of those who many not be fully versed as DUers are.

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I feel like Dems could have done a better job organizing and selecting questions (Original Post) EveHammond13 Feb 2019 OP
No that is silly. This is how it is done. manor321 Feb 2019 #1
Definitely Awsi Dooger Feb 2019 #2
yes. I just hate the idea of the GOP getting an easy PR win they certainly didn't deserve EveHammond13 Feb 2019 #4
There are closed-door Congressional hearings for Cohen n/t DonaldsRump Feb 2019 #3
+1 uponit7771 Feb 2019 #5
The good stuff is closed door uponit7771 Feb 2019 #6
Nope. Disagree entirely, especially as the Rs have run out of questioners. stopbush Feb 2019 #7
I would be trying to coordinate. Yes we each have our own agenda but there is limited time and UniteFightBack Feb 2019 #8
I agree. shanny Feb 2019 #9
Here is what the Committee is supposed to question Cohen on blogslut Feb 2019 #10
Unrec n/t emulatorloo Feb 2019 #11
 

manor321

(3,344 posts)
1. No that is silly. This is how it is done.
Wed Feb 27, 2019, 04:17 PM
Feb 2019

Each Representative has their own initiative to do what they want. And some of them are following up on important questions. If super coordination was desired, then there is no need for a committee. Just assign one person to ask all the questions. This is how government works.

 

Awsi Dooger

(14,565 posts)
2. Definitely
Wed Feb 27, 2019, 04:19 PM
Feb 2019

The most effective moments have been spontaneous and mostly accidental. But there should have been several great probing segments, using the word, "Why?" as you mentioned. That was always Larry King's favorite word during an interview.

stopbush

(24,396 posts)
7. Nope. Disagree entirely, especially as the Rs have run out of questioners.
Wed Feb 27, 2019, 04:23 PM
Feb 2019

All of the people left on the committee who have yet to ask questions are Ds. The remainder of the first round of questions is a D-only forum.

 

UniteFightBack

(8,231 posts)
8. I would be trying to coordinate. Yes we each have our own agenda but there is limited time and
Wed Feb 27, 2019, 04:26 PM
Feb 2019

we need to focus and not cover the same ground 5 times.

 

shanny

(6,709 posts)
9. I agree.
Wed Feb 27, 2019, 04:27 PM
Feb 2019

As a group they never seem to land knock-out punches. And it is not as if they don't have the opportunity.

What's up with that?

blogslut

(37,999 posts)
10. Here is what the Committee is supposed to question Cohen on
Wed Feb 27, 2019, 04:31 PM
Feb 2019
https://oversight.house.gov/sites/democrats.oversight.house.gov/files/documents/2019-02-20%20Oversight%20Committee%20Hearing%20Memo%20re.%20Michael%20Cohen.pdf

https://www.lawfareblog.com/michael-cohen-house-oversight-committee-prepare-procedural-disaster

* the President’s debts and payments relating to efforts to influence the 2016 election;

* the President’s compliance with financial disclosure requirements;

* the President’s compliance with campaign finance laws;

* the President’s compliance with tax laws;

* the President’s potential and actual conflicts of interest;

* the President’s business practices;

* the Trump International Hotel in Washington, D.C.;

* the accuracy of the President’s public statements;

potentially fraudulent or inappropriate practices by the Trump Foundation; and

public efforts by the President and his attorney to intimidate Mr. Cohen or others not to testify.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I feel like Dems could ha...