Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

garybeck

(9,942 posts)
Wed Jan 4, 2012, 05:37 PM Jan 2012

Leahy's response to my email complaining about his support for PIPA (SOPA)

I sent an email complaining about PIPA to my Senator Leahy. In his response he claims that his PIPA act only targets content that is "in complete or substantially complete form – not mere clips." He also says that the bill is only designed to target "the worst of the worst websites."

This is in contrast to what I've read and seen all over the net lately, that any snippet no matter how long or short, even if someone does a karaoke version of a song, is a potential target. And that not just the sites that are primarily devoted to distributing pirated software, but ANY site that allows users to upload content (like youtube) or any web host that finds copyrighted material on their servers, no matter how much there is.

Without having read the bill.... these two views seem in stark contrast. anyone here know... is Leahy downplaying, or is the internets overplaying the concern?

His complete response is below:


Dear Mr. XXXX:

Thank you for contacting me about the Preventing Real Online Threats to Economic Creativity and Theft of Intellectual Property (PROTECT IP) Act. I appreciate hearing from you on this issue.

The growth of the digital marketplace is extraordinary and it gives creators and producers new opportunities to reach consumers, but it also brings with it the perils of piracy and counterfeiting. The increased usage and accessibility of the Internet has transformed it into the new Main Street. Internet purchases have become so commonplace that consumers are less wary of online shopping and therefore more easily victimized by online products that are unsafe or stolen. Online piracy and the sale of counterfeit goods cost the American economy billions of dollars. This is unacceptable in any economic climate, but it is devastating today.

Last Congress, I introduced the Combating Online Infringement and Counterfeits Act, legislation that would have provided the Department of Justice with an important tool to crack down on websites that are primarily dedicated to online infringement. This legislation was approved unanimously by the Judiciary Committee, where I serve as Chairman, but was not acted upon by the full Senate. Building on my effort from last Congress, I introduced the bipartisan PROTECT IP Act on May 12, 2011.

The PROTECT IP Act authorizes the Department of Justice to file a civil action against the registrant or owner of a domain name that accesses a foreign rogue website, or the foreign-registered domain name itself, and to seek a preliminary order from the court that the site is dedicated to infringing activities. The court is authorized to issue a cease and desist order against such a rogue website, and can also authorize law enforcement to serve that order on specified third parties, including Internet service providers, payment processors, online advertising network providers, and search engines. These third parties would then be required to take appropriate action to either prevent access to the Internet site, or cease doing business with the site. The Act also authorizes rights holders victimized by rogue online sites to bring similar actions against such a site, but only to affect the financial viability of the theft.

This bill is designed to target the worst of the worst websites – those that only engage in the theft of American intellectual property. It does not target individual content that may be distributed on the Internet, and the infringing content made available on these sites must also be in complete or substantially complete form – not mere clips. This legislation simply provides law enforcement and rights holders with an increased ability to protect our intellectual property, which will benefit American consumers, American businesses, and American jobs. For more information on the PROTECT IP Act, please visit my website at leahy.senate.gov.

The Judiciary Committee reported this bill unanimously by voice vote on May 26, 2011. I look forward to the full Senate beginning consideration of this bill on January 24, 2012.

Thank you again for contacting me. Please keep in touch.

Sincerely,

PATRICK LEAHY
United States Senator
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Leahy's response to my em...