General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumsduforsure
(11,885 posts)To con people into believing its bad , when its good, and make it acceptable for the few that'll believe anything they say is true. Its the opposite of the truth. They know it too. the cuts are again to pay for more to go to the wealthy.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)The term "entitlements" correctly describes the funds. We are entitled to them because we paid for them.
Theoretically, cuts in taxes for general revenue -- such as trump's tax cuts for the wealthy -- should not affect SS or Medicare, but it definitely will have an impact at some point.
Cuts in Medicare by previous Presidents -- even President Obama -- have not really impacted the program significantly; however, don't trust trump. Haven't really looked at what trump is proposing closely because his junk is not likely to be enacted.
watoos
(7,142 posts)I have no problem with the word entitlement. I am getting SS and Medicare right now because I am entitled to them, I paid in to them for 45 years.
Sherman A1
(38,958 posts)I paid into them and therefore am entitled to receive my benefit according the rules of the program.
Entitlements is merely government-speak for those benefits which must be paid out by law, earned and expected. The term is not meant to be offensive.
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)We pay for them, therefore we are entitled to them.
emulatorloo
(44,112 posts)and love what I call willful misinterpretation of fact and truth. They apparently teach that in Republicans 101.
JayhawkSD
(3,163 posts)Why do we let the opponent define the argument? An entitlement is something to which one is entitled. If you pay for something you are entitled to receive that for which you paid.
Our response should be, "You're damned right it's an entitlement, so keep your filthy hands off of it."
certainot
(9,090 posts)tax breaks for the rich and corps will pour down to us, media deregulation will lower prices, net neutrality is bad, single payer doesn't work, and so on
still_one
(92,122 posts)to those benefits.
THAT IS WHAT IT MEANS
The word "entitlement" has developed a negative connotation because people DO NOT UNDERSTAND the word. The connotation has been twisted by right wing groups to imply a meaning of "sense of entitlement", to say they "don't truly deserve it", and that is right wing bullshit.
Social Security and Medicare are called entitlements because anyone who meets the criteria to receive them, has a RIGHT to receive them. They are, in fact, ENTITLED to these benefits.
Why some seem so willing to be manipulated by the right wing propaganda machine on things like this is absurd.
It is similar to what they did with the word liberal, to equate it with a negative connotation, or this so-called liberal media.
When a republican refers to the Democratic party as the "democrat" party, it is time to call them out when that occurs, and correct it right then and there. That occurred during the Cohen hearing when a republican House member did that, and unfortunately, Cummings should have stopped him the moment he said that, and corrected it. Allowing republicans to define us has been one of our major errors.
That is the problem, we tend to let these things slide, and they get distorted and misrepresented. You have to stop it in its tracks.
watoos
(7,142 posts)Democrats don't know how to combat right wing propaganda. I get SS and Medicare, I paid in to them for 45 years, I am entitled to them.
I live among Trumpers in central Pa. when they call me a Socialist I tell them that Republicans are really the Socialists. Trump just gave billions of taxpayer dollars to soy bean farmers because they lost profits because of Trump's tariffs. I tell them if they want to fight Socialists go to Alaska where every resident is given a check from taxes put on oil drillers.
Republicans are also liberals. They are liberal with regulations on banks and the environment and other institutions.
Here's the main problem that Democrats have that is always overlooked, the M$M is complicit with the far right and controls the narrative, pushes far right narratives. It is hard for Democrats to buck Repugs with the M$M on the side of Repugs.
EndGOPPropaganda
(1,117 posts)In central Pa, heres my suggestion:
Dont engage on policy, its fruitless.
Engage on propaganda. Tell them Fox lies to them to get votes for billionaire tax cuts. Ask them who Rupert Murdoch is. Ask them if they know what he did in the U.K. and Australia. Ask them if they like getting lied to and controlled by a foreigner.
Ask them how it feels to be suckered by billionaires who are picking their pocket. Call them suckers and fools. Tell them Dems are the party of average people, that Jesus would be a Dem today, and Republicans are a party controlled by billionaires who are lying to people like them.
This is my strategy in Westerm PA and Ohio. And it works! No one will ever tell you youre right to your face. But youll see their views changing over time. The key is to get them to doubt Fox.
watoos
(7,142 posts)Re: Socialism, we have a large stream that runs through the center of our borough of 1500 people. I tell them thank god we got the Army Corps of Engineers to build our flood control project back in the 60's or maybe our 2 bridges and downtown would have flooded out.
EndGOPPropaganda
(1,117 posts)The way to get through to right wingers is to laugh at them and point out they are idiots getting suckered by billionaires.
Dont debate. Laugh. Denigrate. Think of Hannities style, except youre telling the truth. It works.
still_one
(92,122 posts)taxpayer dollars so they can either give themselves an extra bonus, have the corporation buy back shares of its stock, to elevate its price, but do very little to elevate the position of their employees, at least according to the latest statistics, wages have been stagnant for most workers for quite some time, and there sure isn't any indication that the new tax bill improved that
JHB
(37,158 posts)Back at least since the 80s, conservatives would cite, accurately, how much of the federal budget went to entitlements.
And then they'd spend the rest of their speech or appearance talking about Welfare, never once mentioning what a thin slice of the big, scary number they cited was actually welfare programs vs the big chunks that were SS and Medicare. They led the audience to the false impression that we were spending huge fortunes on poor people, without actually saying so. It's not as if Bush thought up the technique when he fostered the impression that Saddam was involved in 911.
This fed directly into prejudices and propaganda that there was a vast army of "shiftless, lazy" you-know-whos sponging off "your hard-earned tax dollars."
EndGOPPropaganda
(1,117 posts)The E word is a Frank Luntz-tested way to imply poor people are lazy. Do not use it! Thanka for posting this.
Iggo
(47,548 posts)NRaleighLiberal
(60,014 posts)We are entitled to them because we payed into them.
But - those on the right use it as if we are getting something for nothing.
It's a shame, but the word has been weaponized by propaganda
SWBTATTReg
(22,110 posts)to STLMO was (at garden show)?
NRaleighLiberal
(60,014 posts)Books sold and signed, many new friends. Talk at Bowood was great experience. Lived Pi Pizza and Pappy's BBQ. Exhausting but worth it. Off to Taylor MI for an event Saturday?
SWBTATTReg
(22,110 posts)LiberalLovinLug
(14,169 posts)I think Democrats have to understand this. It seems sometimes they are too arrogant for their own good sometimes. By clinging onto these names long after they have been poisoned. Give it up! You can't always win the battles, winning the war is more important. Republicans have successfully changed the meaning of entitlements to mean either limousine libtards sipping champagne and feeling entitled to speak out just because of their celebrity, (or bribe their kids into exclusive colleges), that or Democratic voters that are voting D just because they feel 'entitled' to get free stuff. Stick with "earned benefits" and do not waiver.
Its almost like when the Republicans decided to call the Affordable Care Act, "Obamacare". In the mistaken belief that it would fail, (with their help), and so this move, or any future move even remotely towards a mandated tax based health insurance system, would be forever stained with his name, and the debacle they were hoping to bring about.
But when Democrats saw this, and with the belief that it would succeed, especially with Hillary almost assured to carry on in the Presidency, fix the problems and solidify it, they doubled down and began to join the Rs in adopting the name "Obamacare" instead of pounding out the term Affordable Care Act at every opportunity when guests on news shows. I remember even Obama himself calling it "Obamacare"! When every time the legislation came up, they should have made a point of referring to is as the ACA only. Because it only opened the door for Republicans to muddy the waters in their base states to the point that most supported the ACA, but hated "Obamacare", even though they were the same thing! The word "Affordable" was lost in the discussion, and it was easily re-defined as a (failing) vanity project by Obama.
Bengus81
(6,931 posts)watoos
(7,142 posts)People don't know that we pay monthly premiums that comes out of our SS. There is also a small deductible.
Then after that, Medicare rarely pays the entire expense, 80% is pretty accurate.
Medicare for all isn't the same as single payer health care.
area51
(11,905 posts)people are calling for single-payer/comprehensive Medicare for All; improved Medicare. The current version of Medicare is way too skimpy and expensive.
PubliusEnigma
(1,583 posts)populistdriven
(5,644 posts)Nearly everyone agrees that we should have some sort of minimum military always capability aka spending, say 500 billion. Therefore it is non-discretionary.
It also helps put the already paid for nondiscretionary social security and Medicare spending in better perspective.
Now let the right attack the "baked in" (their words) non-discretionary spending.
watoos
(7,142 posts)Too bad it will never happen. People need to listen to Ike's farewell address to the nation.
We will never balance the budget as long as we spend so much on the military. We have 12 or 13 aircraft carriers and the rest of the world has 2 or 3.
populistdriven
(5,644 posts)To bad the left is too conservative to do it.
watoos
(7,142 posts)What the M$M calls the far left is really centrist America. The big gorilla in the room is that people underestimate the effect of the M$M. People actually believe that msnbc is liberal when in fact all that msnbc does in put a left leaning slant to a right wing narrative.
Democrats have already forgotten that the reason we won a blue tsunami in 2018 is because we ran to the left. Yes there were places where candidates like Connor Lamb had to run slightly right but all in all we won in 2018 by being leftists err centrists.
UpInArms
(51,280 posts)zentrum
(9,865 posts)We pay for it!!!! Hello?
Odoreida
(1,549 posts)It has nothing to do with feeling "entitled".
Better to educate people on this point than try to dumb it down, causing more confusion.
The Federal Government pays obligations in this order.
1) Debt service.
2) Entitlements -- This is the official legal term, not political rhetoric.
3) Budget items.
Social Security & Medicare and entitlements because they are legally obligated to be paid regardless of the budget.
llmart
(15,536 posts)We are entitled to them.
redstatebluegirl
(12,265 posts)Fine, write me a check for the money I have paid in over the years. Of course they can't since the current generation will be paying for us, as we did for the one before us.
IronLionZion
(45,420 posts)Unless you're wealthy and powerful, then you are entitled to tax cuts and subsidies and all sorts of sweet business deals to help you create jobs overseas or automate and replace American workers.
Silver Swan
(1,110 posts)"Entitled" is the official word for someone receiving Social Security receiving benefits. ("Benefits" is also the official term for such payments.) If you meet the requirements for Social Security benefits, but have not file a claim, you are "eligible" for benefits. You must file an application claiming benefits to become "entitled."
FiveGoodMen
(20,018 posts)fescuerescue
(4,448 posts)First off they are entitlements. People paid in and they are entitled to it.
Second. That language actually helps cements that they cannot be taken away.
I suspect that the right would love call them something different. Like "temporary benefits"
Response to kpete (Original post)
MineralMan This message was self-deleted by its author.
marybourg
(12,611 posts)Stop letting the right wing distort our language and dominate our thinking.
Cerulean Southpaw
(32 posts)remind them of what entitled really means. it doesn't mean privileged or getting a handout, it means you hold the title to a thing. you own it and it IS owed to you, and they're talking about stealing it.
we need to get back to using the word for what it really means, so it has no value as a weapon.
YES YES YES PLEASE
Response to kpete (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
area51
(11,905 posts)debsy
(530 posts)... as I have been paying into them for nearly 40 years!
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)I paid my first SS taxes in 1971 and I'm still paying them every two weeks in 2019!
mntleo2
(2,535 posts)...Gore talked about a "locked box," over 20 years ago. This was about balancing the budget on the SS Trust money with the pretense "it would be paid back..." Oh yeah, where is it, Congress, is it even being discussed? Nope, nope, nope!"
I hate to say it as I have some issue with Gore but he was more than right about this. They have taken $trillions and then try to say we will not have enough money to pay everyone. BullS**t!!! why do they think they are so special that they can just take our money for their own BS like not taxing the rich and for that matter not taking SS out of anyone who makes more than $114,000 a year?
If we want this to change perhaps it takes those of us to keep asking Congress, the press, and our own Legislators, "Where's ma money, Beyyyitch???" And why aren't the deadbeat rich paying their fair share?
Just sayin' here ...
Love, Cat in Seattle
Ilsa
(61,694 posts)murielm99
(30,733 posts)I'm glad that right wingers are finally catching on to the fact that Social Security and Medicare are considered "entitlements." For years, far right politicians and pundits had their followers arguing that we should cut entitlements while they were oblivious to the fact the the pols and pundits meant Social Security and Medicare. It took the left years of saying "you know, Social Security and Medicare are entitlements" before they began to realize they had been arguing to cut their own benefits.
These memes are coming from the right. They demonized the word and now that they realize it applys to things they like, they want us to stop using it. Fuck them.
SergeStorms
(19,192 posts)I heard a republiCANT utter the word "entitlement". It should infuriate every American, republiCANT or Democrat!
PatrickforO
(14,570 posts)These are are earned benefits.
Kashkakat v.2.0
(1,752 posts)benefit. Unlike welfare programs which come out of general revenue.
Why not just reclaim the word? And use another word to denote welfare programs coming out of GPR?
karin_sj
(808 posts)And even more so when it's a Democrat or a left-leaning newscaster or pundit that uses that term. INFURIATING!
Progressive dog
(6,900 posts)because the US government made a contract with us. We paid for those entitlements over our working lives so that we would not be a burden on society.
The word entitlement is not the problem, the theft of our payments to fund higher income for those who have the most is the problem.
keithbvadu2
(36,752 posts)cstanleytech
(26,280 posts)deek
(3,414 posts).
tclambert
(11,085 posts)The greediest of the greedy, who made their fortunes on UNEARNED income, just want ALL the money. They don't want poor people, which to them includes working class people, to have ANY of the money.
You probably think that would take us back to the time of slavery. The greediest of the rich are thinking, "Yeah, those were great times. If only someone would make America great like that again."
summer_in_TX
(2,731 posts)There's now a visceral negative reaction to the word. It's not just Republicans. Independents and Dems too have absorbed it from the culture (a.k.a. MSM). It bypasses rational thought. Any attempt to reclaim it will be a huge uphill battle and isn't worth the time and energy.
R's carefully developed that visceral reaction over time. It would take a longterm pr campaign with an emotional appeal that developed an opposite visceral reaction, not an exercise in logic. That's going to cost time and money. Is that the best use of it?
When you are explaining you're losing.
Texin
(2,594 posts)I worked and paid into the system that guaranteed I'd be rewarded from them when I retired. I AM ENTITLED to those benefits I paid into them for decades! Maybe the narrative for Dems should be whether rethugs should be able to glom onto the system we paid into and our IRAs to pay for retrumplican boondoggles or not. When do poor rethug trump voters get wise to this shit?
Catch2.2
(629 posts)How to Brand themselves. How to get out the message to the public. The republicans are great at this. The Dems...not so much.
SpezelEd
(3 posts)Entitlement means you paid for it, so you're entitled to it. Please stop calling it welfare.
pnwmom
(108,973 posts)And welcome to DU, SpezelED!
DeminPennswoods
(15,278 posts)The official name for social security is Old Age, Survivors and Disability Insurance. Everyone knows how insurance works, you pay into it and when the time comes and you need it, it pays out benefits.