Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsScott Turow: "A Crime in Public View": How William Barr Pardoned Donald Trump
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2019/03/how-william-barr-pardoned-donald-trump?utm_source=facebook&utm_brand=vf&mbid=social_facebook&utm_social-type=owned&utm_medium=social&fbclid=IwAR0A6GABBFFuQf8-JIH3BA7ujrz0hoUFrbc5poouyC5DqNJv4ejRrTqCkb4A Crime in Public View: How William Barr Pardoned Donald Trump
Trump had plenty of reasons to obstruct Muellers investigation, whether or not there was an underlying crime. The most obvious one has been staring us in the face all along.
by Scott Turow
March 25, 2019 12:41 pm
Attorney General William Barrs summary of special counsel Robert Muellers conclusions, in the fancy language of lawyers, impeaches itself. That means that its own words and reasoning call some of Barrs conclusions into doubt, particularly Barrs eagerness to say that Donald Trump cant be proven to have obstructed justice.
snip//
This sounds like arcane legal stuff, but its actually a matter of common sense. In judging whether a suspect had a corrupt intent to obstruct justice, a reasonable prosecutor would look at the potential gain to the defendant by engaging in the questionable behavior. In most cases, if the target didnt commit an underlying offense, he would have no reason to hinder the investigation.
But that is not true in Trumps case. Throughout his election campaign and long after, Trump denied that Russia was responsible for the massive interference in our election that Mueller has now concluded occurred. Trump made these denials despite, to quote Barr, multiple offers from Russian-affiliated individuals to assist the Trump campaign. Aside from any crimes Trump or his campaign committed by being in cahoots with the Russians, there are other clear gains to Trump in hindering the investigation. The most obvious is that the Russian interference, which both Barr and Mueller say the Trump campaign knew about, calls the legitimacy of the 2016 election into question.
With our focus on whether the president is going to jail, we have run past a point that is now undeniable: Donald J. Trump was elected president of the United States after a sustained series of crimes by the Russian government aimed at boosting his chances of winning. Because of the political damage to the president that Russias criminal interference posed, he had an obvious reason to terminate the investigation. In other words, he had something to hide, and the Mueller inquiry seems to have concluded that there was plenty of evidence that he hid it.
To argue that no underlying crime means no obstruction is therefore nonsense. That is fallacious reasoning and it impugns Barrs integrity and his reputation as a lawyer. Worse, it represents a troubling effort to paper over the acknowledged evidence that Mr. Trump committed a crime in public view.
Scott Turow, a Vanity Fair contributor, attorney, and best-selling author, is the author of Presumed Innocent, The Burden of Proof, Ordinary Heroes, Identical, and Testimony.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
11 replies, 3667 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (67)
ReplyReply to this post
11 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Scott Turow: "A Crime in Public View": How William Barr Pardoned Donald Trump (Original Post)
babylonsister
Mar 2019
OP
dalton99a
(81,450 posts)1. Bill Barr was hired by Republicans for a purpose
Just like before:
empedocles
(15,751 posts)2. The Bush pardon, and his published anti-investigation of trump.
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)3. Yup - same shit, same players.
Stone, Manafort, Barr - all have long and ignominious histories in Republican criminal activities.
Hermit-The-Prog
(33,321 posts)4. we need to follow up and prosecute this time
There are too many criminals in the Republican party who have gone unprosecuted for too long. It's no longer a political party; it's a mob using cult methods to get votes.
OMGWTF
(3,951 posts)9. x 1,000,000
dchill
(38,471 posts)11. Well put.
Baltimike
(4,143 posts)5. knr
Jarqui
(10,123 posts)6. A little more Barr Mueller background to Iran Contra
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)7. K&R
zentrum
(9,865 posts)8. This is part of why
....Trump could shoot someone on Fifth Avenue and get away with it. He's got enablers and protectors.
I feel like Democracy has been dying by a thousand cuts for a few decades and is now in the ER, barely breathing.
Corgigal
(9,291 posts)10. Doesn't
his son and daughter (I believe) both, now work inside the Trump administration? My belief is they both been recently hired. Couldn't they find a job any where else? Maybe, some where not so corrupt?