General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWH will get the Mueller report before the public does in case it wants to make redactions, Barr says
Terrific. What could possibly go wrong. Please, someone, tell me this is illegal?
EDIT to add: msnbc is saying this is a lie, per DOJ official
The White House will get the Mueller report before the public does in case it wants to make redactions, Barr says
Sonam Sheth
2h
Graham said Barr told him he would send the report to the White House first in case it wants to claim executive privilege over any parts.
Mueller's full report is likely to contain crucial details about the motivations behind the myriad contacts and meetings President Donald Trump's associates had with Russians, as well as Trump's repeated deference to Russian President Vladimir Putin.
Trump's defense lawyers have previously said they want a chance to review and "correct" the Mueller report before it's made public.
Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina said Tuesday that Attorney General William Barr told him he would send the special counsel Robert Mueller's final report on the Russia investigation to the White House before the public sees it, in case it wants to claim executive privilege over any parts.
Graham, who chairs the Senate Judiciary Committee, also said Barr told him it would most likely take "weeks, not months," to make a version of Mueller's final report public.
more...
https://www.businessinsider.com/barr-mueller-report-white-house-executive-privilege-2019-3?utm_content=buffer91eb6&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook.com&utm_campaign=buffer-insider-main&fbclid=IwAR3RrjHDBeBai9z3VoLK4Q7mGva-tDe09b6g7y5nebYRCdFTpRMJIoOrpjc
BigmanPigman
(51,567 posts)Why, so the fucking moron can tell him what else to block from the report. It will end up to be 20 pages instead of his 19 page opinion. Now it will be editied by the person who is the target...what the fuck?!?!?
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100211959544
Dyedinthewoolliberal
(15,546 posts)first thing I thought of, 'that sounds illegal'
SWBTATTReg
(22,077 posts)rings very hollow.
LonePirate
(13,408 posts)Anything remotely negative will be redacted and all that will be left are the statements related to no indictments or no prosecution for collusion/conspiracy).
a kennedy
(29,618 posts)GoCubsGo
(32,075 posts)I strongly suspect the report will get leaked, regardless if whatever stunts the Trump Crime Syndicate tries to pull with it. Much like the Pentagon Papers were.
dumbcat
(2,120 posts)Who would get in trouble?
GoCubsGo
(32,075 posts)Whoever leaks it will get in trouble, just as Daniel Ellsberg did when he leaked the Pentagon Papers. That's if they get caught.
G_j
(40,366 posts)proving once again, what PT Barnum said.
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)WHAT ARE THEY HIDING? That will be the mantra.
NewJeffCT
(56,828 posts)all documents must be preserved
all supporting evidence, testimony and data must be preserved
kstewart33
(6,551 posts)As of 4:10 ET.
babylonsister
(171,035 posts)Kablooie
(18,612 posts)Normal procedure -- for REPUBLICANS.
marylandblue
(12,344 posts)So I don't see how he could shield this either.
tymorial
(3,433 posts)This isn't going to work.
tymorial
(3,433 posts)Disallowing congress from having access to the full report via executive privilege is tantamount to a balance of power end around. Trump may not understand this but Barr and the DOJ certainly understand the implications of a president attempting to hide evidence which demonstrates high crimes, misdemeanors and/or Treason. We had another president try this once. An 18 minute gap didn't work then and it won't work now.
rockfordfile
(8,699 posts)Trumpf would like to make up more BS to put into the "republican report". It wasn't enough for them with the "official BS".