Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums'It's a woman. It's not Pulaski.': New documentary argues Revolutionary War hero was intersex
https://www.chicagotribune.com/lifestyles/ct-life-casimir-pulaski-intersex-040319-story.htmlWhen the skeleton believed to belong to the Revolutionary War hero Casimir Pulaski was first examined by modern scientists in the late 1990s, the results were disappointing.
Youll just have to shoot me, a forensic anthropologist told the head of the scientific team, according to a new Smithsonian Channel documentary.
Its a woman. Its not Pulaski.
The team soon realized there were at least three possible explanations for the unusual finding: The bones theyd extracted from a well-known monument in Savannah, Ga., may have belonged to someone other than Pulaski. But it was also possible that Pulaski was a biological woman who lived as a man. And it was possible that Pulaski was one of the estimated 1 in 1,500 people who are born intersex, or with bodies that dont fit neatly into the standard definitions of male and female.
Youll just have to shoot me, a forensic anthropologist told the head of the scientific team, according to a new Smithsonian Channel documentary.
Its a woman. Its not Pulaski.
The team soon realized there were at least three possible explanations for the unusual finding: The bones theyd extracted from a well-known monument in Savannah, Ga., may have belonged to someone other than Pulaski. But it was also possible that Pulaski was a biological woman who lived as a man. And it was possible that Pulaski was one of the estimated 1 in 1,500 people who are born intersex, or with bodies that dont fit neatly into the standard definitions of male and female.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
7 replies, 1132 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (15)
ReplyReply to this post
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
'It's a woman. It's not Pulaski.': New documentary argues Revolutionary War hero was intersex (Original Post)
WhiskeyGrinder
Apr 2019
OP
The headline, while a grabber, isn't necessarily helpful to a wider understanding of gender and
WhiskeyGrinder
Apr 2019
#3
LiberalFighter
(50,888 posts)1. What are the standard definitions of male and female?
WhiskeyGrinder
(22,326 posts)2. They vary!
WhiskeyGrinder
(22,326 posts)3. The headline, while a grabber, isn't necessarily helpful to a wider understanding of gender and
intersex, I don't think.
The body is Pulaski. The body had female biological markers, including XX chromosomes. But Pulaski wasn't a woman; he was a man.
WhiskeyGrinder
(22,326 posts)4. Afternoon kick.
WhiskeyGrinder
(22,326 posts)5. Early evening kick.
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)6. K&R
Interesting article. Thanks for posting!
littlemissmartypants
(22,632 posts)7. Interesting. nt