HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » White House Plans 'Robust...

Tue Apr 16, 2019, 04:45 PM

White House Plans 'Robust Response' to Mueller Report

Last edited Tue Apr 16, 2019, 05:31 PM - Edit history (1)

White House Plans ‘Robust Response’ to Mueller Report

April 16, 2019 at 5:15 pm EDT By Taegan Goddard 36 Comments


https://politicalwire.com/2019/04/16/white-house-plans-robust-response-to-mueller-report/

"SNIP.....

ABC News “has learned that the White House has received a broad briefing on the report — described as non-specific in nature, focused mostly on the mechanics of the report itself — including that it will be divided into sections on obstruction and collusion and that certain portions will be redacted.”

“White House officials and sources close to the administration say advisers to the president are most concerned about the possibility of previously unknown examples of potential obstruction of justice and what information Mueller’s team learned from witness interviews, especially former White House Counsel Don McGahn who sat for well over 30 hours with Mueller’s investigators.”

“Sources say the president hasn’t privately expressed any concern over the contents of the report, and is not likely to read it in its entirety.”

......SNIP"

14 replies, 754 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 14 replies Author Time Post
Reply White House Plans 'Robust Response' to Mueller Report (Original post)
applegrove Apr 2019 OP
C_U_L8R Apr 2019 #1
bluestarone Apr 2019 #2
gratuitous Apr 2019 #9
Volaris Apr 2019 #12
htuttle Apr 2019 #3
N_E_1 for Tennis Apr 2019 #4
Volaris Apr 2019 #14
Fullduplexxx Apr 2019 #5
sinkingfeeling Apr 2019 #6
The Velveteen Ocelot Apr 2019 #7
Wellstone ruled Apr 2019 #8
Brother Buzz Apr 2019 #10
Wellstone ruled Apr 2019 #11
Brother Buzz Apr 2019 #13

Response to applegrove (Original post)

Tue Apr 16, 2019, 04:52 PM

1. Vindications don't require robust responses

Just saying the obvious.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to C_U_L8R (Reply #1)

Tue Apr 16, 2019, 04:54 PM

2. EXACTLY!!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to C_U_L8R (Reply #1)

Tue Apr 16, 2019, 05:14 PM

9. Yeah, I thought the administration was all exonerated and stuff

What's this "robust response" jazz?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to C_U_L8R (Reply #1)

Tue Apr 16, 2019, 05:41 PM

12. Right?! What's he gonna do, argue with his own 'exoneration' lol?

If they were half as smart as they think they actually are, 2 things would follow from that:

1) they would shut the fuck up and stop making it worse for themselves

2) we'd be in real deep shit as a democratic nationstate

As it is, this cabal of keystone cops are gonna outsmart themselves right into a fucking prison cell in the long run. Even a gin-drunk Steve Bannon knew better than to get dragged into a special prosecutor fight...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to applegrove (Original post)

Tue Apr 16, 2019, 04:54 PM

3. This. is. so. fucked. up.

The accused gets a briefing on the report that is obviously more in-depth than anything Congress has. Before Congress can get at it.

This is Fucked.

Barr should be impeached first.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to applegrove (Original post)

Tue Apr 16, 2019, 05:03 PM

4. Not likely to read it in it's entirety...

Any mentally stable person,guilty or innocent, would be dying to read that report about them and their activities for obvious reasons. I believe most would study it with relish.

But he’ll probably come out saying ludicrous things meant to distract and confuse.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to N_E_1 for Tennis (Reply #4)

Tue Apr 16, 2019, 05:55 PM

14. Pfffft he's not gonna read the cliffs notes version lol

He's gonna ask Barr what's in it, and then when he's asked about it he's gonna say whatever he wants cause he doesn't know its contents from his own ass from a hole in the ground.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to applegrove (Original post)

Tue Apr 16, 2019, 05:04 PM

5. Just like all innocent people do

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to applegrove (Original post)

Tue Apr 16, 2019, 05:08 PM

6. The WH copy, that IQ45 won't read in It's entirety, had better have the same

redactions as those given to Congress.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to applegrove (Original post)

Tue Apr 16, 2019, 05:12 PM

7. But Trump didn't do anything wrong! No collusion! So what's the fucking problem??

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to applegrove (Original post)

Tue Apr 16, 2019, 05:13 PM

8. Hey,where is that Rudy

rebuttable thingee,Hey Rudy get in here.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Wellstone ruled (Reply #8)

Tue Apr 16, 2019, 05:34 PM

10. Giuliani's rebuttal thingy is only 87 pages long, and the orange anus wants....

him to puff it (and him) up with, you know, with more bigly words:

amazing / beautiful / best / big league / brilliant / elegant / fabulous / fantastic / fine / good / great / happy / honest / incredible / nice / outstanding / phenomenal / powerful / sophisticated / special / strong / successful / top / tremendous / unbelievable / big / huge / major / many / massive / numerous / staggering / substantial / tough / vast

and to attack Mueller’s report more:

boring / complete and total / crooked / disgusting / dishonest / dopey / dumb / goofy / horrible / interesting (as a synonym for suspicious) / not good / obsolete / out of control / overrated / pathetic / ridiculous / rude / sad / scary / stupid / terrible / unfair / weak / worst

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Brother Buzz (Reply #10)

Tue Apr 16, 2019, 05:39 PM

11. Is this the Redacted version or

the pre redacted version. Subject 9/11 verb.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Wellstone ruled (Reply #11)

Tue Apr 16, 2019, 05:42 PM

13. THAT is a blast from the past



Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread