Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJonathan Swan: Trump's personal lawyer Jay Sekulow just told me he first saw the Mueller report on..
Trumps personal lawyer Jay Sekulow just told me he first saw the Mueller report on Tuesday afternoon. Trumps legal team, including the Raskins, made two visits to the Justice Department to view the report securely late Tuesday and early Wednesday, Sekulow said.
Link to tweet
Why would the President's personal lawyer have access to a federal government report before members of Congress?
Link to tweet
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
9 replies, 1440 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (23)
ReplyReply to this post
9 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Jonathan Swan: Trump's personal lawyer Jay Sekulow just told me he first saw the Mueller report on.. (Original Post)
demmiblue
Apr 2019
OP
Javaman
(62,510 posts)1. why? because we now live in a banana republic. nt
Funtatlaguy
(10,870 posts)3. And all the bananas 🍌 are rotten.
hvn_nbr_2
(6,486 posts)8. A banana republic ruled by Banana Republicans. nt
spanone
(135,816 posts)2. Criminals one and all.
CincyDem
(6,347 posts)4. I have never heard it before and don't know if it's true: Barr explained why.
Something about long standing department policy that individuals named in a report like this have an opportunity, along with their attorneys, to review the full report. I think he did actually say "...that's why the president's personal attorneys have seen it".
I have never heard this before however I think it's one of the points that Stone is currently arguing with his recent filings. As a defendant he has a right to the full report.
dchill
(38,465 posts)5. Whattya gonna do about it?
Nevermypresident
(781 posts)6. Well...let's just issue some more subpoenas
Baitball Blogger
(46,698 posts)7. Did Barr lie?
Me.
(35,454 posts)9. And I Bet Without Redactions