Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

demmiblue

(36,838 posts)
Thu Apr 18, 2019, 10:47 AM Apr 2019

Jonathan Swan: Trump's personal lawyer Jay Sekulow just told me he first saw the Mueller report on..

Trump’s personal lawyer Jay Sekulow just told me he first saw the Mueller report on Tuesday afternoon. Trump’s legal team, including the Raskins, made two visits to the Justice Department to view the report securely — late Tuesday and early Wednesday, Sekulow said.




Why would the President's personal lawyer have access to a federal government report before members of Congress?


9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Jonathan Swan: Trump's personal lawyer Jay Sekulow just told me he first saw the Mueller report on.. (Original Post) demmiblue Apr 2019 OP
why? because we now live in a banana republic. nt Javaman Apr 2019 #1
And all the bananas 🍌 are rotten. Funtatlaguy Apr 2019 #3
A banana republic ruled by Banana Republicans. nt hvn_nbr_2 Apr 2019 #8
Criminals one and all. spanone Apr 2019 #2
I have never heard it before and don't know if it's true: Barr explained why. CincyDem Apr 2019 #4
Whattya gonna do about it? dchill Apr 2019 #5
Well...let's just issue some more subpoenas Nevermypresident Apr 2019 #6
Did Barr lie? Baitball Blogger Apr 2019 #7
And I Bet Without Redactions Me. Apr 2019 #9

CincyDem

(6,347 posts)
4. I have never heard it before and don't know if it's true: Barr explained why.
Thu Apr 18, 2019, 10:55 AM
Apr 2019

Something about long standing department policy that individuals named in a report like this have an opportunity, along with their attorneys, to review the full report. I think he did actually say "...that's why the president's personal attorneys have seen it".

I have never heard this before however I think it's one of the points that Stone is currently arguing with his recent filings. As a defendant he has a right to the full report.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Jonathan Swan: Trump's pe...