Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NightWatcher

(39,343 posts)
Thu Apr 18, 2019, 12:43 PM Apr 2019

DU Lawyers and legal scholars. Doesn't an attempt at Obstruction fall under Inchoate Crimes?

and wouldn't that go on to say that attempts, even though unsuccessful (see trump trying to get McGahn to fire Mueller, even though McGahn would rather, and ultimately did, resign than commit a crime (of obstruction)), were still attempts at Obstruction and thus a crime on its face?

I'm scouring Osborn v. United States 385 U.S. 323 (1966), but it seems to prove this and there are a number of other cases which uphold this as well.

See this at DoJ regarding Obstruction as Inchoate
https://www.justice.gov/jm/criminal-resource-manual-1736-inchoate-obstruction-justice-offenses

As per the cases as I read this, if a person made "endeavors" to Obstruct and they were unsuccessful, they were still liable for having committed a crime by attempting to Obstruct.


8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

PeeJ52

(1,588 posts)
1. Is obstruction the only crime where you fail that you get a second chance?
Thu Apr 18, 2019, 12:46 PM
Apr 2019

If I screw up robbing a bank to I get off? If I try to shoot someone and miss is that OK? I don't get it...

NightWatcher

(39,343 posts)
2. Then way inchoate (or attempted crimes work) is that the attempt or conspiracy to commit are crimes
Thu Apr 18, 2019, 12:51 PM
Apr 2019

If you and I plan to rob a bank and take endeavors to do this (cases the bank to study security, or starts planning getaway routes, or does anything substantive to further..), and we show up to the bank only to find that you are really a cop and were not really planning but letting me plan, I can go to jail even though I never entered the bank or stole the first dollar.

trump TRIED to Obstruct and even though McGahn did not let him (to the extent he wanted to do so), he is still guilty, by definition. He admitted his guilt to Lester Holt on tv and WE ALL SAW IT LIVE!

elleng

(130,732 posts)
5. Definition. 18 U.S.C. 1503 defines "obstruction of justice"
Thu Apr 18, 2019, 12:55 PM
Apr 2019

as an act that "corruptly or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication, influences, obstructs, or impedes, or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede, the due administration of justice."

Elements of an Obstruction of Justice Charge
There was a pending federal judicial proceeding;
The defendant knew of the proceeding; and.
The defendant had corrupt intent to interfere with or attempted to interfere with the proceeding.

NightWatcher

(39,343 posts)
7. even the redactions show that trump TRIED to commit but McGahn stopped it.
Thu Apr 18, 2019, 12:57 PM
Apr 2019

There's prosecutable evidence of a crime. This needs to be taken up by an impeachment investigation.

Tommy_Carcetti

(43,154 posts)
8. The more the afternoon goes on, the more I'm thinking....
Thu Apr 18, 2019, 01:01 PM
Apr 2019

....

1. Mueller was hesitant to buck DOJ policy about criminally indicting a sitting President (which sucks, but not like a lot of people weren't thinking that would be his take)

2. Mueller wasn't shy to lay out evidence for the purposes of potential impeachment

3. There's still a dearth of evidence on collusion only because of Trump's obstruction.

Stay tuned.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»DU Lawyers and legal scho...