Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Miles Archer

(18,837 posts)
Thu Apr 18, 2019, 12:51 PM Apr 2019

Neal Katyal: "Must look at p2 of Report." He's discussing this now on MSNBC.

Neal Katyal
@neal_katyal

Must look at p2 of Report. Mueller says he applied a legal standard whereby he could NOT accuse Trump of crimes. So there isn't a way the Report exonerates. "we determined NOT to apply an approach that could potentially result in a judgment that the President committed crimes"

12:15 PM · Apr 18, 2019 · Twitter Web Client


38 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Neal Katyal: "Must look at p2 of Report." He's discussing this now on MSNBC. (Original Post) Miles Archer Apr 2019 OP
Then wat was the point? Dream Girl Apr 2019 #1
THANK YOU !!! and that about Trump's kids!!! uponit7771 Apr 2019 #2
Don Jr Miles Archer Apr 2019 #5
Ah, so ignorance of the law IS an excuse... klook Apr 2019 #8
This is probably specific to campaign-finance violations ... I'm sure Mueller was quoting the mr_lebowski Apr 2019 #11
Ignorance of the law is now an excuse to break the law ?!?!?! WOW !!! uponit7771 Apr 2019 #9
Only if you are a Republican crook. Mueller let his country down rockfordfile Apr 2019 #14
I'm disappointed if this was Mueller, we need to talk to Mueller quick fast yesterday. uponit7771 Apr 2019 #17
Mueller carried water for zentrum Apr 2019 #37
No. Govt has to prove accused had "mens rea", criminal intent. High bar. Jr ignorant, Manafort not. Bernardo de La Paz Apr 2019 #19
Willfully"... with general knowledge of the illegality of conduct.." sounds like intent comes down t uponit7771 Apr 2019 #21
"intent" is not written into speeding regulations, because negligence is not a defense there. Bernardo de La Paz Apr 2019 #24
Knowledge of the law doesn't define intent, Intent does uponit7771 Apr 2019 #29
Well, duh, yeah, of course, I didn't state otherwise. Intent is written in, but NOT for speeding. Bernardo de La Paz Apr 2019 #32
Dons ... INTENT ... was to get dirt on Clinton from the Russians. Don's knowledge of the legality uponit7771 Apr 2019 #36
There's no way to know Trump Jr.'s intent without having deposed him Mr. Ected Apr 2019 #38
Maybe he was afraid of bucking DOJ policy against criminally indicting a sitting President? Tommy_Carcetti Apr 2019 #4
Looks to me like Mueller was planning to punt FakeNoose Apr 2019 #7
Where Mueller had provable cases he got convictions. House-Senate impeachment-conviction lower bar. Bernardo de La Paz Apr 2019 #20
Impeachment and conviction is a HIGHER bar. lagomorph777 Apr 2019 #25
Read my post text for the first time. I say that. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Apr 2019 #27
Mismatch between your headline and your body content. lagomorph777 Apr 2019 #31
Yes. Life is complicated & hard to put everything into subject line, though I try my best. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Apr 2019 #35
That policy is a Republican policy. Considering history rockfordfile Apr 2019 #15
Impeachment. TruckFump Apr 2019 #6
He didn't necessarily even "feel," he was following the incredibly thin amount of policy he knew of coti Apr 2019 #10
Barely even "policy" - more like a line in a memo. lagomorph777 Apr 2019 #26
This ScratchCat Apr 2019 #3
The person most damaged by the Mueller report is Barr. lagomorph777 Apr 2019 #28
I believe he's referring to 'in terms of wording in this report', not in terms of 'how he conducted mr_lebowski Apr 2019 #12
White washed. There goes Mueller's reputation for "a stand up guy' rockfordfile Apr 2019 #13
He accepted long standing Justice Dept guidelines that sitting Presidents can't be indicted Tom Rinaldo Apr 2019 #16
Mueller follows the book. rarely loses cases. He wins. Not a white wash. Also wait for his testimony Bernardo de La Paz Apr 2019 #22
Take a look at Page 290 FakeNoose Apr 2019 #18
Trump knows he is a criminal & guilty. I agree w you. Mueller didn't whitewash or sugar-coat. . .nt Bernardo de La Paz Apr 2019 #23
I think you're right True Dough Apr 2019 #34
If they were ignorant of law, why did they lie and attempt to cover up subject of TT meeting wishstar Apr 2019 #30
Yeah that ain't gonna fly with the public. lagomorph777 Apr 2019 #33

Miles Archer

(18,837 posts)
5. Don Jr
Thu Apr 18, 2019, 12:57 PM
Apr 2019
Mueller could not find enough evidence that Donald Trump Jr. was smart enough to realize he was breaking the law by accepting Russian assistance for his father’s campaign.





https://www.rawstory.com/2019/04/11-jaw-dropping-bombshells-mueller-report/
 

mr_lebowski

(33,643 posts)
11. This is probably specific to campaign-finance violations ... I'm sure Mueller was quoting the
Thu Apr 18, 2019, 01:24 PM
Apr 2019

statute accurately here. You have to show the finance violation was done 'willfully' in violation of the law, apparently.

zentrum

(9,865 posts)
37. Mueller carried water for
Thu Apr 18, 2019, 03:34 PM
Apr 2019

...the Bush Administration, telling Congress there were WMD is Iraq and cited Powell to do it, although it was widely circulated at the time that this was bogus.

He was following Repug orders.

Anyone with true integrity would have made damn sure WMD's existed and further, would have had conscience pangs over the fact that Iraq DID NOT invade us and was not behind 9/11 before he helped to send thousands into war to die and suffer for no damn reason except Halliburton.

Have never seen a Repug not run true to form.

uponit7771

(90,323 posts)
21. Willfully"... with general knowledge of the illegality of conduct.." sounds like intent comes down t
Thu Apr 18, 2019, 03:08 PM
Apr 2019

... to knowledge of the crime and not the act itself.

How in the hell ?!!?

I didn't know speeding was a crime doesn't pass for me even on a great day

Bernardo de La Paz

(48,988 posts)
24. "intent" is not written into speeding regulations, because negligence is not a defense there.
Thu Apr 18, 2019, 03:12 PM
Apr 2019

Other statutes have "intent" written into them.

Don't apply inapplicable analogies.

uponit7771

(90,323 posts)
36. Dons ... INTENT ... was to get dirt on Clinton from the Russians. Don's knowledge of the legality
Thu Apr 18, 2019, 03:20 PM
Apr 2019

... is NOT relevant then.

Mueller says it is

Mr. Ected

(9,670 posts)
38. There's no way to know Trump Jr.'s intent without having deposed him
Thu Apr 18, 2019, 03:46 PM
Apr 2019

Same is true for all the children, the President, the Vice President, and every other soul in that administration that did not testify to the grand jury or be interviewed by the Special Counsel's office.

Jr.'s only testimony was a pack of lies delivered to Congress, a criminal offense that he's yet to pay the price for.

Tommy_Carcetti

(43,160 posts)
4. Maybe he was afraid of bucking DOJ policy against criminally indicting a sitting President?
Thu Apr 18, 2019, 12:55 PM
Apr 2019

So he just laid it all out in non-criminal terms?

I'm just spitballing here.

FakeNoose

(32,613 posts)
7. Looks to me like Mueller was planning to punt
Thu Apr 18, 2019, 01:01 PM
Apr 2019

... and wait for the House to decide on impeachment proceedings.

Maybe?

Bernardo de La Paz

(48,988 posts)
20. Where Mueller had provable cases he got convictions. House-Senate impeachment-conviction lower bar.
Thu Apr 18, 2019, 03:05 PM
Apr 2019

For removal, you only have to convince Senators that there is a good case, not "beyond a reasonable doubt".

Of course, with Trump-Republicons, many of them complicit, you actually have a very high bar.

lagomorph777

(30,613 posts)
25. Impeachment and conviction is a HIGHER bar.
Thu Apr 18, 2019, 03:13 PM
Apr 2019

You have to convince politicians that they will be booted out of office unless they vote to convict. And that includes a substantial number of Reptilian politicians.

TruckFump

(5,812 posts)
6. Impeachment.
Thu Apr 18, 2019, 12:58 PM
Apr 2019

That is what Mueller, IMO, was looking at because as a traditionalist, he felt that a sitting POTUS could not be indicted.

coti

(4,612 posts)
10. He didn't necessarily even "feel," he was following the incredibly thin amount of policy he knew of
Thu Apr 18, 2019, 01:14 PM
Apr 2019

at the Department. He was following the rules the best way he knew how, whether they were right or not.

ScratchCat

(1,977 posts)
3. This
Thu Apr 18, 2019, 12:55 PM
Apr 2019

is spiraling out of control quickly. The report clearly doesn't say what Barr claims it says, and even Fox News folks are shaking their heads asking "how are we going to spin and defend this, Barr lied!?!?!"

 

mr_lebowski

(33,643 posts)
12. I believe he's referring to 'in terms of wording in this report', not in terms of 'how he conducted
Thu Apr 18, 2019, 01:27 PM
Apr 2019

the investigation all along'.

See Rosenstein's comments from last month where he said DoJ policy is to not imply people are guilty of crimes ... unless we're prepared to indict for those crimes.

Let's see if this principle holds true when the DoJ puts out the report on Steele here in the next month or so ... and they DON'T indict him ... will they still adhere to this so-called 'policy' of their's ... for Steele?

rockfordfile

(8,700 posts)
13. White washed. There goes Mueller's reputation for "a stand up guy'
Thu Apr 18, 2019, 01:31 PM
Apr 2019

Mueller is a republican, trump is a republican and bushco is a republican.

Tom Rinaldo

(22,912 posts)
16. He accepted long standing Justice Dept guidelines that sitting Presidents can't be indicted
Thu Apr 18, 2019, 01:40 PM
Apr 2019

That is a view point that many dispute, but honest jurors have come down on both sides of that issue. Mueller preserved and presented the evidence that can be used to impeach, or to charge Trump once out of office. I think whitewash is too harsh. What Barr has attempted to do in regards to the report however is a whitewash.

FakeNoose

(32,613 posts)
18. Take a look at Page 290
Thu Apr 18, 2019, 01:42 PM
Apr 2019

This is relayed by Jody Hunt, former Chief of Staff for Jeff Sessions. He was in the room when Sessions told Chump he was recusing himself and an special investigator has been hired.



There is a lot of evidence in Part 2 of Chump obstruction, Mueller didn't whitewash anything. It's in the report but Mueller didn't know how/when to bring obstruction charges against a sitting president.

Mueller cannot impeach the President himself, he could only provide the evidence and stand back while the House does the impeachment.

True Dough

(17,296 posts)
34. I think you're right
Thu Apr 18, 2019, 03:17 PM
Apr 2019

Mueller was cautious not to overstep, but he left a nice trail of crumbs for legislators to follow.

wishstar

(5,268 posts)
30. If they were ignorant of law, why did they lie and attempt to cover up subject of TT meeting
Thu Apr 18, 2019, 03:15 PM
Apr 2019

The fact that Trump and Co. lied and made up the adoption cover for the TT meeting is clearly an indication they knew soliciting and accepting Russian help was illegal. Don't know how Mueller team could decide ignorance of campaign finance laws when Manafort was there and is an attorney and a campaign expert and Kushner is a lawyer too. I don't see any other reasonable explanation for all of the lying and covering up about the contacts with Russians unless they knew that knowingly accepting Russian assistance by campaign was illegal. Also FBI had briefed the campaign about foreign contacts and need to report them.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Neal Katyal: "Must look a...