Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Watching Judiciary Committee? (Original Post) mobeau69 May 2019 OP
That was fun malaise May 2019 #1
It really was, he was awesome. n/t monmouth4 May 2019 #2
Gomer's up. mobeau69 May 2019 #3
I missed my favorite. Dammit. What did he say? Funtatlaguy May 2019 #4
What does it mean when someone on the committee asks to remove the last words? Delmette2.0 May 2019 #5
It has to do with debate on what they are considering BumRushDaShow May 2019 #7
So the whole meeting will be extended by 5 minutes each time someone says that? Delmette2.0 May 2019 #11
Their "debate" about their markup BumRushDaShow May 2019 #14
Wow, thank you. Delmette2.0 May 2019 #17
A little tricki called offering a pro forma (for the sake of form) amendment. mobeau69 May 2019 #8
Thank you. Delmette2.0 May 2019 #16
Cohen magnficiently exploded! BumRushDaShow May 2019 #6
Hard nosed dude from Memphis. mobeau69 May 2019 #10
He and Sheila hit it outta the park! BumRushDaShow May 2019 #12
Yes, she did. I'm ready for the vote! mobeau69 May 2019 #13
Their vote to start the markup process was like 22 - 12 BumRushDaShow May 2019 #15
No worries. I just want to witness history! mobeau69 May 2019 #18
Am still watching! BumRushDaShow May 2019 #19
Gawd, I detest Gaetz. mobeau69 May 2019 #9

BumRushDaShow

(128,760 posts)
7. It has to do with debate on what they are considering
Wed May 8, 2019, 11:14 AM
May 2019
Capitol Question: Strike the Last Word

The question “what does it mean when a member moves to strike the last word” was posed. The answer was that it invokes the five minute rule allowing members to lengthen debate by five minutes.

https://www.c-span.org/video/?155213-1/capitol-question-strike-word


This allows the members to have time to give additional statements (up to 5 minutes each).

Delmette2.0

(4,164 posts)
11. So the whole meeting will be extended by 5 minutes each time someone says that?
Wed May 8, 2019, 11:19 AM
May 2019

Or just for the person is made the request?

BumRushDaShow

(128,760 posts)
14. Their "debate" about their markup
Wed May 8, 2019, 11:35 AM
May 2019

is extended 5 minutes per every "motion to strike the last word" (the last word, in terms of the Congressional record, would have been the regular conclusionary statement that would have ended a regular debate). It is done as a Parliamentary "motion" and is an optional request for members.

Meaning that there is normally a fixed time for debate but if a member makes a motion to "strike the last word" once the debate period has ended (and the motion is agreed to - which it normally is) then that member gets up to 5 minutes to speak, the remarks then added on to the debate time (not everyone must speak if they don't want to). If you have 20 members make the motion and no one objects and they each use the 5 minutes, then the total time gets extended by 100 minutes.

mobeau69

(11,139 posts)
8. A little tricki called offering a pro forma (for the sake of form) amendment.
Wed May 8, 2019, 11:15 AM
May 2019

When a member says they "move to strike the last word" it, too, is part of that formality. They’re asking to strike, or delete, the very last word of the amendment under debate, indicating that they’re offering a pro forma amendment to replace that last word.

That’s exactly what a pro forma amendment is. As a formality, a member can simply say they’re offering an amendment to the amendment under debate, and get their own five minutes to speak. They never even have to submit a real amendment. Just verbally saying they’re offering one, as a formality, gives them five minutes.

BumRushDaShow

(128,760 posts)
15. Their vote to start the markup process was like 22 - 12
Wed May 8, 2019, 11:46 AM
May 2019

so I don't think there is any issue.

But they want all of their statements to be included in the Congressional record because this is historic.

BumRushDaShow

(128,760 posts)
19. Am still watching!
Wed May 8, 2019, 01:25 PM
May 2019

(mostly listening... although I should be vacuuming.. May have to pull out the earbuds and stream on a phone. )

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Watching Judiciary Commit...