the "Lois Lerner" talking point

[Eliot Rosewater]

someone wanna save me the time so I can point out why there is NO comparison between what Obama DOJ did in that case and what is happening now please? As in the current DOJ being partisan and refusing to enforce subpoenas.

Now I remember what that was, boy are they reaching LOL

[irisblue]

1. Can I have a bit more context please? Thx

[Eliot Rosewater]

3. Righty is saying Obama DOJ was partisan in not prosecuting her

she did NOTHING wrong now that I have reminded myself of what happened

turns out most of the violators were rightwing

[guillaumeb]

2. Lois Lerner was an IRS official.

The supposed context for the right is that the IRS under Obama was exclusively targeting right leaning groups for 501(c)3 violations.

That is, and was, incorrect.

[Eliot Rosewater]

4. WRONG

she targeted wrong doing and MOST of the wrongdoing just HAPPENED (big surprise) to be by righy

Would we accuse a DA of bias if they sought to charge domestic abuse cases and it turned out 80% of the offenders were men? Would that DA be guilty of bias against men?

[guillaumeb]

5. Exactly.

That the guilty happened to be right wing organizations was evidence of one thing.

No, not the guilt of the organizations, but that there is a Deep State.

More right wing conspiracy nonsense.

[Eliot Rosewater]

6. OK but the way you typed it made it seem like the accusation that they targeted righty

was true which it wasnt.

Then the IRS settled the case under SESSIONS the no good fucking piece of shit, blaming Obama and Holder of course.

I am so angry, I want


R E V E N G E