Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJudge says white supremacists charged over violent riots are protected by First Amendment
Judge says white supremacists charged over violent riots are protected by First Amendment
"The government has sufficient means at its disposal to prevent and punish such behavior without sacrificing the First Amendment."
Luke Barnes
Jun 4, 2019, 4:32 pm
A federal judge in Los Angeles on Monday threw out rioting charges against three members of the Rise Above Movement (RAM), a violent far-right group which participated in the August 2017 Unite the Right rally as well as other clashes throughout California.
The defendants had been charged with inciting riots under the Anti-Riot Act following a series of incidents at political rallies, most notably in April 2017 at the University of California Berkeley. Videos posted online showed the defendants at the event with fists taped for fighting and faces partially covered by skeleton masks.
Defense attorney John McNicholas, however, argued that the governments charges were focused on the plans and conversations surrounding RAMs trip to Berkeley not the actual violence that occurred. As a result, the charges unfairly covered lawful assembly and speech, a point with which U.S. District Judge Cormac Carney agreed.
Because the Anti-Riot Act regulates a substantial amount of protected speech and assembly, the Court finds the Anti-Riot Act is unconstitutionally overbroad, Carney wrote in his 12-page decision. The political nature of a riot increases the risk that the Anti-Riot Act criminalizes a substantial amount of protected expressive activity.
The court does [not] condone RAMs hateful and toxic ideology, Carney continued. But the government has sufficient means at its disposal to prevent and punish such behavior without sacrificing the First Amendment.
The court does [not] condone RAMs hateful and toxic ideology, Carney continued. But the government has sufficient means at its disposal to prevent and punish such behavior without sacrificing the First Amendment.
The judge urged defendants Robert Rundo, Aaron Eason and Robert Bowman to move away from violence and hate. The trio were released on Monday.
more...
https://thinkprogress.org/white-supremacists-riots-free-speech-f3c644e8386a/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 881 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Judge says white supremacists charged over violent riots are protected by First Amendment (Original Post)
babylonsister
Jun 2019
OP
onecaliberal
(32,826 posts)1. So now running someone down with your fucking car is protected speech.
These violent and dangerous white nationalists will only be emboldened.
Dennis Donovan
(18,770 posts)2. A Dubya judge
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cormac_J._Carney#Legal_and_judicial_career
On January 7, 2003, Carney was nominated by President George W. Bush to a seat on the United States District Court for the Central District of California vacated by Carlos R. Moreno. Carney was confirmed by the United States Senate on April 7, 2003, and received his commission on April 9, 2003. At the district court, Carney has handled complex civil and criminal matters, including patents, copyrights, trademarks, securities, business finance, civil rights, drug conspiracies and white collar crime.
<snip>
On January 7, 2003, Carney was nominated by President George W. Bush to a seat on the United States District Court for the Central District of California vacated by Carlos R. Moreno. Carney was confirmed by the United States Senate on April 7, 2003, and received his commission on April 9, 2003. At the district court, Carney has handled complex civil and criminal matters, including patents, copyrights, trademarks, securities, business finance, civil rights, drug conspiracies and white collar crime.
<snip>
...but then there's this?
On July 16, 2014, Carney declared the California death penalty to be unconstitutional, saying it is so arbitrary and plagued with delays that it violates the Eighth Amendment's ban on cruel and unusual punishment. In his 29-page order he vacated the death sentence of Ernest Dewayne Jones, who was sentenced to death in 1995 for rape and murder. The order was appealed by then California Attorney General Kamala Harris, a decision that she made despite the fact she was not required to pursue the matter any further as Attorney General. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals heard oral arguments on August 31, 2015, and in a unanimous decision overturned the decision on November 12, 2015.<Los Angeles Times, 11/13/15).
gratuitous
(82,849 posts)3. The judge urged these assholes to move away from violence and hate
So there's that. I guess that's what passes for the judge reading the riot act to a defendant. These poor, misunderstood boys couldn't possibly have known that coming to the rally ready to rumble and planning to incite a riot and violence would result in . . . a riot and violence.
Dear kindly Judge, your honor, Leapin' lizards! That's why we're so bad!
Wounded Bear
(58,647 posts)4. Well, they certainly deserved a strong talking to...