Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAnyone heard anything on the Virginia Lt. Gov. Fairfax accusations?
That has disappeared from the news but I understand he released polygraph test results which he says shows he told the truth that the two alleged sexual assault incidents were both consensual.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 661 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Anyone heard anything on the Virginia Lt. Gov. Fairfax accusations? (Original Post)
brush
Jun 2019
OP
WhiskeyGrinder
(22,328 posts)1. There was this:
https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2019/04/virginia-justin-fairfax-sexual-misconduct-allegations-polygraph-unreliable/
Polygraph Tests Are Notoriously Unreliable. Theyre Even Worse in Cases of Sexual Assault.
(snip)
His report, obtained by CBS and published Wednesday, concluded that Fairfaxs physiological indicatorssuch as perspiration, breathing, and heart ratewere not indicative of deception when he denied engaging in non-consensual sexual activity with either of his accusers, Vanessa Tyson and Meredith Watson. Fairfax, for his part, seems to have taken the results as an exoneration: I feel so strongly regarding my innocence that I submitted myself to polygraph tests for each of the accusations against me, he said in a statement to CBS. I passed those tests. I did not assault either of my accusers.
(snip)
But on the other side, lie detector tests are perhaps even more flawed when used on those accused of sexual misconduct. Mary Koss, a public health professor at the University of Arizona who has studied sexual violence for decades, argues that polygraph exams are particularly ineffective in testing the truthfulness of a person accused of sexual assault because most rapists, even those in prison, do not perceive what they did as rape no matter what others saw. She adds, If you truly believe something to be true, even if it is a misperception, you can pass a polygraph.
Indeed, research shows that most offenders will not admit to rape or to sexual assault, even at the same time as they cop to behavior that amounts to it. Thats according to Kevin Swartout, a Georgia State professor of psychology, who studies perpetrators of sexual violence and the type of people most likely to commit those crimes. When Swartout surveys men about whether theyve committed sexual violence, he has to carefully design his questions to account for this problem. If you were to ask somebody, Did you penetrate someones vagina with your penis when they did not want to? They might say, Yeah, I did that, when I was in college, or whatever.
But when you ask if they committed rape? As Swartout explains, Theyll say, Oh, no, no, Ive never, Ive never done anything like that.' Once, he says, when he asked about 350 college men a similar series of questions, about 30 admitted to behavior that the FBI would label rape. But only one person openly said yes, he had committed rape.
The reason boils down to our tendency to give ourselves a pass when were evaluating our own behavior, especially compared to others. Labels like rapist, Swartout says, carry a special meaning above and beyond their actual definition. Its basically the worst thing that you can be labeled. And the discrepancy between the facts and perpetrators self-regard is exacerbated by rape mythssuch as the belief that rape is usually a stranger-leaps-out-of-the-bushes situationthat reassure men who have committed sexual violence against a friend or intimate partner that they dont qualify as a perpetrator.
(snip)
His report, obtained by CBS and published Wednesday, concluded that Fairfaxs physiological indicatorssuch as perspiration, breathing, and heart ratewere not indicative of deception when he denied engaging in non-consensual sexual activity with either of his accusers, Vanessa Tyson and Meredith Watson. Fairfax, for his part, seems to have taken the results as an exoneration: I feel so strongly regarding my innocence that I submitted myself to polygraph tests for each of the accusations against me, he said in a statement to CBS. I passed those tests. I did not assault either of my accusers.
(snip)
But on the other side, lie detector tests are perhaps even more flawed when used on those accused of sexual misconduct. Mary Koss, a public health professor at the University of Arizona who has studied sexual violence for decades, argues that polygraph exams are particularly ineffective in testing the truthfulness of a person accused of sexual assault because most rapists, even those in prison, do not perceive what they did as rape no matter what others saw. She adds, If you truly believe something to be true, even if it is a misperception, you can pass a polygraph.
Indeed, research shows that most offenders will not admit to rape or to sexual assault, even at the same time as they cop to behavior that amounts to it. Thats according to Kevin Swartout, a Georgia State professor of psychology, who studies perpetrators of sexual violence and the type of people most likely to commit those crimes. When Swartout surveys men about whether theyve committed sexual violence, he has to carefully design his questions to account for this problem. If you were to ask somebody, Did you penetrate someones vagina with your penis when they did not want to? They might say, Yeah, I did that, when I was in college, or whatever.
But when you ask if they committed rape? As Swartout explains, Theyll say, Oh, no, no, Ive never, Ive never done anything like that.' Once, he says, when he asked about 350 college men a similar series of questions, about 30 admitted to behavior that the FBI would label rape. But only one person openly said yes, he had committed rape.
The reason boils down to our tendency to give ourselves a pass when were evaluating our own behavior, especially compared to others. Labels like rapist, Swartout says, carry a special meaning above and beyond their actual definition. Its basically the worst thing that you can be labeled. And the discrepancy between the facts and perpetrators self-regard is exacerbated by rape mythssuch as the belief that rape is usually a stranger-leaps-out-of-the-bushes situationthat reassure men who have committed sexual violence against a friend or intimate partner that they dont qualify as a perpetrator.
JI7
(89,247 posts)2. his accusers opposed an investigation and only wanted to appear at public hearings
run by Republicans.
polygraphs are not reliable .
brush
(53,771 posts)3. Thanks. I hadn't heard both declined investigations.