Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Javaman

(62,500 posts)
Fri Jun 14, 2019, 12:20 PM Jun 2019

well this was fucking sobering...

'Existential' Risk of Climate Crisis Could Lead to Civilizational Collapse by 2050, Warns Report

https://www.commondreams.org/news/2019/06/04/existential-risk-climate-crisis-could-lead-civilizational-collapse-2050-warns-report

(here is the pdf: https://docs.wixstatic.com/ugd/148cb0_e0416b00a4a740648407ea843c850fa6.pdf )

Even by the standards of the dire predictions given in climate studies, this one's extreme: civilization itself could be past the point of no return by 2050.

That's the conclusion from Australian climate think tank Breakthrough National Centre for Climate Restoration, which released a report (pdf) May 30 claiming that unless humanity takes drastic and immediate action to stop the climate crisis, a combination of food production instability, water shortages, and extreme weather could result in a complete societal breakdown worldwide.

"We must act collectively," retired Australian Admiral Chris Barrie writes in the foreword to the new study. "We need strong, determined leadership in government, in business and in our communities to ensure a sustainable future for humankind."

Though the paper acknowledges that total civilizational collapse by 2050 is an example of a worst-case scenario, it stresses that "the world is currently completely unprepared to envisage, and even less deal with, the consequences of catastrophic climate change."

more at link but read the pdf.

30 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
well this was fucking sobering... (Original Post) Javaman Jun 2019 OP
No doubt. cilla4progress Jun 2019 #1
I think this article is a very conservative view. We have mush less time in my opinion. MLAA Jun 2019 #2
What's your estimate? maryellen99 Jun 2019 #5
I think it will be more like 2030-35... Javaman Jun 2019 #9
:( maryellen99 Jun 2019 #14
5 years. 10 years if we are unusually lucky. MLAA Jun 2019 #18
I agree with you on that estimate:( maryellen99 Jun 2019 #20
one thing I am doing now given all the extreme weather that is already impacting crop plantings MLAA Jun 2019 #21
Global population will hit 9.8 billion by 2050. MineralMan Jun 2019 #3
I've been advocating population control for 30 years. roamer65 Jun 2019 #13
Five years after I was born Global population was just 2.5 Billion MineralMan Jun 2019 #17
Yup Calculating Jun 2019 #15
Knowing what most could know now about how we've destroyed the planet (if they chose to research it) MLAA Jun 2019 #19
It's not really the developed world that's contributing to overpopulation. Turin_C3PO Jun 2019 #23
Understand, but we use way more resources per capital 😉 MLAA Jun 2019 #25
Very true. Turin_C3PO Jun 2019 #26
It just surprises me young people are still anxious to bring children into the world MLAA Jun 2019 #27
I guess the biological imperative to procreate Turin_C3PO Jun 2019 #28
That plus too much wine😬 MLAA Jun 2019 #29
The current political vision is missing as leaders fail to accept reality. BSdetect Jun 2019 #4
Leaders fail to accept reality because voters fail to accept reality. Act_of_Reparation Jun 2019 #7
This sucks, I plan on still being alive in 2050. Shell_Seas Jun 2019 #6
Yep. shanny Jun 2019 #8
This will be the future NewJeffCT Jun 2019 #10
probably without the feathers though... Javaman Jun 2019 #11
Was thinking Mad Max as I scrolled down the thread and came to your post. PufPuf23 Jun 2019 #12
Cool Calculating Jun 2019 #16
Ooh ooh!!!! Can I be the flaming guitar player guy? Initech Jun 2019 #24
Neither author is a scientist. former9thward Jun 2019 #22
I worry for my grandchildren. lpbk2713 Jun 2019 #30

Javaman

(62,500 posts)
9. I think it will be more like 2030-35...
Fri Jun 14, 2019, 01:46 PM
Jun 2019

given the fact that as time as worn on, more and more estimates have been revising the window downward.

I recall 10 to 15 years ago it was 2 degrees maybe by 2100.

I think given the current political climate of stupidity, it has accelerated things. More over, as the pdf states, that will cause feedback to happen sooner.

there will come a break point, a winter or summer so extreme that there will be no turning back and everyone will sit up and pay attention. of course it will be way too late by that point

MLAA

(17,246 posts)
18. 5 years. 10 years if we are unusually lucky.
Fri Jun 14, 2019, 06:04 PM
Jun 2019

Factors like the one in this article are happening faster and faster and in some cases aren’t even factored into current climate change models. Disclosure: I am not a scientist, I am an engineer, but I do read a lot. Methane like in this article, huge dead zones in the oceans, major extinctions of animals already (and humans are just animals) and on and on.


https://climate.nasa.gov/news/2785/unexpected-future-boost-of-methane-possible-from-arctic-permafrost/

It might help if everyone stopped eating animal products. I stopped about 7 or so years ago. But it may be even too late for that to have the impact we need. So, I am trying to enjoy whatever time is left and do things I enjoy and spend time in nature.

I considered not answering your question because it is so sobering but decided better to answer and you could research and decide to believe it or not for yourself.

All the best, 🙂

MLAA

(17,246 posts)
21. one thing I am doing now given all the extreme weather that is already impacting crop plantings
Fri Jun 14, 2019, 06:39 PM
Jun 2019

I am picking up extra cans of food at the store each time I go. With all the flooding and temp swings this spring it will have to eventually impact availability- price of corn etc.

That old Chinese curse goes ‘May you live in interesting times’ 😉

MineralMan

(146,254 posts)
3. Global population will hit 9.8 billion by 2050.
Fri Jun 14, 2019, 12:25 PM
Jun 2019

Every human being uses energy. Global climate change is caused by people. By 2100, global population would reach 11.2 billion, if some disaster did not drastically change population growth.

See the chart below. Population is the reason for global climate change. If population growth does not slow down, those predictions are probably correct. Meanwhile, the Roman Catholic Church still fights against all contraception. There it is, folks.

roamer65

(36,744 posts)
13. I've been advocating population control for 30 years.
Fri Jun 14, 2019, 01:59 PM
Jun 2019

No one will listen to it until it’s way too late.

Population reduction won’t happen peacefully, it will be via the greatest “show” in human history.

World War III.

Don’t bring children into it, folks.

MineralMan

(146,254 posts)
17. Five years after I was born Global population was just 2.5 Billion
Fri Jun 14, 2019, 03:05 PM
Jun 2019

I was born in 1945. Now, I'm 73 years old and the population has risen to 7.7 billion. If that doesn't alarm anyone, they're not paying any attention at all. The population on this planet has tripled in only about 50 years.

Shocking! Scary! Almost unbelievable.

Calculating

(2,955 posts)
15. Yup
Fri Jun 14, 2019, 02:57 PM
Jun 2019

Overpopulation is the purple sparkling elephant in the room that nobody dares to mention or talk about. Unfortunately other efforts at addressing climate change and resource over-exploitation are nearly futile unless we can do something about the underlying issue of population growth.

MLAA

(17,246 posts)
19. Knowing what most could know now about how we've destroyed the planet (if they chose to research it)
Fri Jun 14, 2019, 06:07 PM
Jun 2019

I am surprised anyone in the so called developed world would choose to have children now.

Turin_C3PO

(13,902 posts)
23. It's not really the developed world that's contributing to overpopulation.
Fri Jun 14, 2019, 06:56 PM
Jun 2019

It’s mostly developing countries with the high birth-rates, some influenced by the Catholic Church.

MLAA

(17,246 posts)
27. It just surprises me young people are still anxious to bring children into the world
Fri Jun 14, 2019, 07:28 PM
Jun 2019

given how short our future is and the suffering they will face. 🙁

Turin_C3PO

(13,902 posts)
28. I guess the biological imperative to procreate
Fri Jun 14, 2019, 07:30 PM
Jun 2019

is too embedded in our DNA to overcome. That’s my theory anyway lol.

Act_of_Reparation

(9,116 posts)
7. Leaders fail to accept reality because voters fail to accept reality.
Fri Jun 14, 2019, 12:55 PM
Jun 2019

It's tempting to pin the blame on a few high-profile terrible people, but the truth of the matter is that those clowns serve at our discretion. If the American people wanted to fix climate change, it would have been fixed a long fucking time ago.

 

shanny

(6,709 posts)
8. Yep.
Fri Jun 14, 2019, 01:40 PM
Jun 2019

And the worst thing about that is in previous climate models the "worst case" is never bad enough.

Javaman

(62,500 posts)
11. probably without the feathers though...
Fri Jun 14, 2019, 01:50 PM
Jun 2019

I don't see many birds making it, but then there are vultures. they will do well.

PufPuf23

(8,753 posts)
12. Was thinking Mad Max as I scrolled down the thread and came to your post.
Fri Jun 14, 2019, 01:53 PM
Jun 2019

Not that hard to predict o Mad Max theme for the not-so-distant future resulting from a trifecta of climate change, disease, and war.

The scale of humanity requires massive amounts of natural resources to survive.

former9thward

(31,930 posts)
22. Neither author is a scientist.
Fri Jun 14, 2019, 06:52 PM
Jun 2019

Let alone a climate scientist. If a paper was written giving the opposite conclusion that would be the criticism.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»well this was fucking sob...