Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jpak

(41,757 posts)
Wed Jun 26, 2019, 06:48 PM Jun 2019

Defense bill calls for military port on Arctic Ocean

https://www.upi.com/Defense-News/2019/06/24/Defense-bill-calls-for-military-port-on-Arctic-Ocean/3241561399214/

June 24 (UPI) -- The defense bill in the U.S. Congress specifies that a new strategic port in the Arctic Ocean must be identified and designated.

The action is meant to counter Russian advances in the Arctic, notably by its submarine fleet, as the ocean warms and becomes easier to navigate.

The 2020 National Defense Authorization Act is expected to receive a vote in the Senate this week. It directs the Secretary of Defense to work with the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the Army Corps of Engineers, the Coast Guard and the Maritime Administration to submit a report to Congress evaluating potential sites for the port. The defense secretary must then designate, within 90 days, one or more of the choices as a "Department of Defense Strategic Arctic Port."

Russia has 7,000 miles of Arctic coast. It regards the region as an area in need of security, as well as a potential economic jackpot. Russian President Vladimir Putin estimated the Russian Arctic region's mineral wealth at $30 trillion. A Senate Armed Services Committee report to Congress said that the polar circle contains undiscovered oil and gas as well as an "abundance of uranium, rare earth minerals, gold, diamonds and millions of square miles of untapped resources."

<more>
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

VOX

(22,976 posts)
1. "The action is meant to counter Russian advances in the Arctic..."
Wed Jun 26, 2019, 06:55 PM
Jun 2019

But with 45 at the wheel, it’s more like building a loading dock for Vlad & Co.

SWBTATTReg

(22,112 posts)
2. I thought we had small bases already up there in Alaska ... could be wrong but probably ...
Wed Jun 26, 2019, 07:04 PM
Jun 2019

wouldn't be a bad thing to expand them...

jpak

(41,757 posts)
3. There's a decaying airstrip on Attu Island and a small DOD base on Shemya Island in the Aleutians
Wed Jun 26, 2019, 07:31 PM
Jun 2019

But no real Naval/Air bases on the coast of Alaska.

The Bering, Chukchi and Beaufort Seas are extremely shallow and large ships cannot safely approach the US coastline.

On top of that, sea ice is a real Force of Nature and could easily overwhelm man-made ports - that would be wildly expensive to build.

Plus - we have no ice-reinforced naval vessels and only one (medium) Coast Guard ice-breaker assigned to the Arctic (Healy) - and it spends that winter in Washington State.

If the US wants to have a permanent naval presence in the Arctic - be prepared to spend some serious coin.

 

Baclava

(12,047 posts)
6. There's large Air Force and Army bases in Alaska and a Coast Guard station on Kodiak
Thu Jun 27, 2019, 12:26 PM
Jun 2019

No Navy bases

SWBTATTReg

(22,112 posts)
7. Ah...I used to subscribe to Alaska Magazine, haven't gotten in a while, thus not up to speed ...
Thu Jun 27, 2019, 12:36 PM
Jun 2019

on things in Alaska. My great aunt was a correspondent for the NYT back 30+ years or so in Steward, Alaska. I used to love her letters and photos that we regularly exchanged.

Thanks for the information and take care!

bluedigger

(17,086 posts)
5. Maybe we should just expand our facilities in the Great Lakes area.
Thu Jun 27, 2019, 12:11 PM
Jun 2019

You know, just let the Arctic Ocean come to us.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Defense bill calls for mi...