Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

underpants

(182,632 posts)
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 11:11 AM Jul 2019

Socialist football team turns profit - but less than last year

Pack's profit drops 98% due to losing, big deals

GREEN BAY, Wis. -- The Green Bay Packers reported a profit of just $724,000 in their latest fiscal year, which included their second consecutive season without a playoff appearance, a large contract extension for quarterback Aaron Rodgers and a change in head coach from Mike McCarthy to Matt LaFleur.

Green Bay's profit in the year ending March 31 was down 97.9% from $34.1 million in the year ending March 2018 and down more than 99% from the record $75 million in the previous fiscal year.

"From a financial standpoint, it was a unique year for the Packers," team president Mark Murphy said Friday.

Expenses rose from $420.9 million to $477.2 million, boosted by Rodgers' $134 million, four-year deal and contracts for several free agents: outside linebackers Za'Darius Smith and Preston Smith, safety Adrian Amos and guard Billy Turner.

While overall revenue increased 5.1% to $477.9 million, local revenue improved by only 2.3%, hurt by consecutive losing seasons that affected pro shop visits and tours of Lambeau Field and the Packers Hall of Fame.

https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/27177743/pack-profit-drops-98-due-losing-big-deals

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Socialist football team turns profit - but less than last year (Original Post) underpants Jul 2019 OP
Packers and Barcelona FC are my two malaise Jul 2019 #1
Barca is owned by the city? underpants Jul 2019 #3
I've wanted to see moves to give us more teams like that. Maybe some regulation brewens Jul 2019 #2
It will never come to pass but that's a great idea underpants Jul 2019 #4
I forgot one part. Team names, logo's and all that, stay with the city they originated brewens Jul 2019 #5

malaise

(268,718 posts)
1. Packers and Barcelona FC are my two
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 11:16 AM
Jul 2019

favorite non-Caribbean teams because I love their approach to ownership

brewens

(13,546 posts)
2. I've wanted to see moves to give us more teams like that. Maybe some regulation
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 11:54 AM
Jul 2019

that requires and team up for sale or wishing to move be offered to the municipality at a fair market price. I'd hope that would stop owners from blackmailing cities and counties into building new stadiums for them. If you want to remain an NFL owner, stay put and build your own damn stadium if you need one! If they are seriously done running the team in a particular town, let the taxpayers decide. If they can't approve the purchase, then the owner can go and do what he wants.

underpants

(182,632 posts)
4. It will never come to pass but that's a great idea
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 10:44 PM
Jul 2019

Look owner George an NFL franchise or a beer distributor is like printing money. It's next to impossible to not make tons of money. Cities could really rake it in and cover services.

Like I said it won't happen unless it's written into the contract.

brewens

(13,546 posts)
5. I forgot one part. Team names, logo's and all that, stay with the city they originated
Sun Jul 14, 2019, 01:27 AM
Jul 2019

in. It's silly to move some of the team names with the franchises anyway. I'd bet Arizona fans would have preferred to rename the Cardinals. Same with the Colts. Did it really make sense for Indianapolis to keep that name? After a couple years it's not the same team, so why did Baltimore end up being the Ravens?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Socialist football team t...