This is bad for Dems!!!111!!:

[Kingofalldems]

Link to tweet

And:

Link to tweet

[redstatebluegirl]

1. How is this bad for democrats?

[Kingofalldems]

4. Edited.

[Qutzupalotl]

8. Sarcasm. It's actually great for Democrats.

Lots of good soundbites today. Republicans look flustered and crazy.

[trev]

27. "Republicans look flustered and crazy."

And that would be different because....

[greatauntoftriplets]

29. Even so, every time a Republican is questioning or haranguing Mueller...

he gets this look on his face.

[skamaria]

43. I noticed that!

WTF is the perfect description! Concise an to the point!

[riversedge]

2. How so??

[Bradical79]

34. Sarcasm written at the bottom of the post

[robleb]

3. ?????

explain why bad

[lunatica]

32. It's a sarcastic statement.

[Bradical79]

33. It says sarcasm at the bottom of the post

[McKim]

40. I Suggest We Treat this as a Serious Matter

This is a very important event in our country and I suggest that we treat it seriously.

[malaise]

5. On the contrary n/t

[Kingofalldems]

10. Come on, you know me.

I even put in the freeper mis-typed exclamation points.

[malaise]

11. Hehehehehe

[Agschmid]

7. I wish people would read threads before alerting, and understand sarcasm.

[irisblue]

9. Yes

[rzemanfl]

15. +1. n/t

[greatauntoftriplets]

30. Yes.

I figured out that it was sarcasm even before I clicked on the thread.

[Kid Berwyn]

12. Bad for Bbbbbbarr.

Guy’s been all over DC telling everybody who’d listen how Mueller would’ve indicted Trump if he found evidence of obstruction.

Har har. Barr lied. And he just got caught. Har har.

[Kingofalldems]

13. My goodness, I actually had to add the sarcasm thing.

[dewsgirl]

21. Oh you added it after people started commenting, I was about to say maybe it needs to be bigger.

LOL

[Whiskeytide]

31. Someone here once posted that ...

... the sarcasm thingy is an affront to sarcasm. I thought that was pretty profound, even for us pointy headed libs.

[Iliyah]

14. Actually it shows that Mueller wanted to indict . . .

But was prevented not too because of the fucked up letter.

That's why impeachment or resignation are only alternative, at this point in time.

Vote the Republicans out of the Senate and the WH.

[Control-Z]

16. I don't understand.

Why is it bad?

[Kingofalldems]

17. Refresh.

[Control-Z]

20. Got it!

Thank you!

[GoCubsGo]

18. It's ALWAYS bad for the Dems.

Even when it's not. Like now. That false narrative sure does get tiresome, doesn't it?

[Dennis Donovan]

19. I keep wondering if others are listening to the same hearing as I am

I think this is devastating for Trump! Yet, I see one kvetching post after another.

[Fullduplexxx]

22. What did mueller mean by that last statement?

[Kingofalldems]

23. I believe it had to do with going outside the report.

[Blue Owl]

24. a HUGH loss for the democrat party !1!!11!!

[Scurrilous]

44. Seriesly hugh!!1!

[BigmanPigman]

25. Didn't Mueller take this statement back at the beginning of the 2nd

testimony in his opening remarks?

[dem4decades]

26. Yes

[BigmanPigman]

28. That means that the OP title is not sarcastic now.

That was not good for Dems.

[Kingofalldems]

36. How's this?

Link to tweet

[BigmanPigman]

45. She asked great questions!

I was cheering when I heard her.

[Kingofalldems]

37. And this:

Link to tweet

[no_hypocrisy]

35. Logically, an act(s) doesn't become a "crime" only upon a prosecutor indicting you for that act(s).

It's still a crime. A prosecutor has the discretion to engage you into the criminal justice system. Any given prosecutor can't indict every single accusation of crime, much to the frustration of the victims.

Here, the DOJ made it clear that notwithstanding if there truly were a strong case to prosecute a crime by a sitting President, its office was prevented by tradition of not being the vehicle to prosecute. It's still a crime. It's illogical to claim innocence. You might as well claim that it never happened.

[Timmygoat]

38. That Devin Nunes

Is he the one who was caught lurking in the bushes at the White House in the dead of night to give Trump sopme info that they had passed on to him?

[magicarpet]

39. Yes he is trDump's chump !

The spy who dove into the cesspool,... and came out smelling like raw sewage.

[cilla4progress]

41. Mueller modified his answer to Lieu

at beginning of afternoon hearing.

[klook]

46. Correct. He clarified that the OLC opinion was the reason they couldn't

consider indicting a sitting president. He did not come back to say there was no justification to indict Trump, just that that was not an avenue open to the Special Counsel. Hardly exculpatory.

[lambchopp59]

42. Meantime, at 1211 Avenue of the Americas studios...