General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThis message was self-deleted by its author
This message was self-deleted by its author (marble falls) on Sat Apr 18, 2020, 03:36 PM. When the original post in a discussion thread is self-deleted, the entire discussion thread is automatically locked so new replies cannot be posted.
cwydro
(51,308 posts)Disappointing.
llmart
(15,499 posts)and if it reaches their bar for "we might lose subscriptions" then they pull it.
Fuck them.
FakeNoose
(32,342 posts)I don't believe they'd do this just to see if they can get away with it. Most newspapers are hanging on by their fingernails already, they don't need extra costs thrown in.
llmart
(15,499 posts)marble falls
(56,358 posts)fair and balanced himself.
dalton99a
(81,065 posts)Liberal media, my ass
mopinko
(69,806 posts)and truth telling.
i bump into the nyt paywall all the time.
there is much here i would like to read.
but this shit here? i just cant.
pecosbob
(7,502 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)I'd bet good money they were trying to defuse reaction against Trump a bit.
We'd cancel but we already did a long time ago. NYT has a multiply proven and well documented record of sabotaging Democratic candidates, especially their 2-year "genteel" hatchet job on Hillary, and helping elect Trump to help Republicans.
displacedtexan
(15,694 posts)Must've been quite a few of us.
marble falls
(56,358 posts)Blue_true
(31,261 posts)Many important things in life are not free, they come about only because money was spent of employees, equipment, ect.
As far as the New York Times goes, management there has been bending over backwards to kiss Trump's ass. I say good riddance to the paper until everyone in management and the editorial board are fired.