General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRepublicans Turned on Nixon. Here's Why They Won't Turn on Trump.
Republicans Turned on Nixon. Heres Why They Wont Turn on Trump.
As was not the case in 1974, Republicans now have counterfactual media that allows or compels them to ignore blatant lawbreaking.
by Harold Meyerson
October 1, 2019
snip//
So why the difference between 2019 and 1974? Why no Republican demands to investigate Trump? What changed the Republican Party over those 45 years? Nixon, after all, relied on tribal enmity no less than Trump. Nixons campaigns railed against Democrats, whom it mushed together with radicals, crazy kids, militant blacks, and hippies. His 1972 campaign turned George McGovern, his Democratic opponent, into the candidate of acid, amnesty, and abortion. His history of red-baiting went all the way back to his initial 1946 run for Congress, when he linked the liberal Democratic incumbent he unseated, Jerry Voorhis, to the Communist Party, which Voorhis opposed. And as president, Nixon and his vice president Spiro Agnew went after the liberal mediaspecifically, the Times, the Post, and CBSclaiming they distorted the news and secretly sought to bring America down. Nixon was a vastly more intelligent pol (and man) than Trump, but he built his career on the fear and loathing he stoked within his base for his political adversaries.
Nonetheless, Nixons tribe bowed to the evidence and deserted him at the endall of the Republican electeds, and probably most of the rank and file.
So why the difference now? What enables Republicans to deny, ignore, or not care about the evidencenot just in the Ukrainian affair but the little kids in cages and the thousand other shocks to which Trump has subjected the nation? That denial, ignorance, and indifference extends well beyond the case of Donald Trump, to such other notable realities as planet-threatening climate change. How did the ism that Republicans scorn the most become empiricism?
There are a host of explanations for why and how Republicans have cocooned themselves from reality, not least the realignment of Southern whites into the GOP, which pushed the party to embrace a much more hard-right politics that drove many moderates into the Democrats ranks. But the rise of right-wing mass media may well be the most important factor differentiating 19 from 74. In 1974, right-wing media remained on the fringe, save in portions of the white South. Most Americans came to understand Watergate from the newscasts of the three national television networks, and from the hearings those networks aired. There was no counterfactual counternarrative coming from Fox News, as there was no Fox News. There were right-wing radio commentators, but few if any were national: Father Coughlin was gone and Rush Limbaugh had yet to arrive. Rupert Murdoch had only recently relocated to Britain from Australia (to which, if we had an immigration policy that penalized the truly evil, he would be instantly deported). If Trump is polling at twice Nixons final-days level, and if congressional Republicans still sing Trumps praises for fear of estranging their counterfactually oriented base, Fox and its ilk are substantially to blame.
more...
https://prospect.org/impeachment/republicans-turned-on-nixon-trump-impeachment-media/
dem4decades
(11,794 posts)Lulu KC
(3,182 posts)I'd forgotten it ever existed. Then discovered a rather motley crew trying to renew it. It sounds like such an antiquated way of thought, like something from Downton Abbey.
moose65
(3,267 posts)The Fairness Doctrine did not apply to cable stations. It only affected stations that broadcast using the public airwaves. So, it wouldn't have any effect on Fox News. What it DID affect, though, were those AM radio stations that have now been completely taken over by right-wing hate fests.
Thomas Hurt
(13,919 posts)They are cutting and running or enabling him. It is embarrassing that they have place a second criminal in the WH.
honest.abe
(9,238 posts)I suspect if his numbers drop below 30% then he is toast.
underpants
(185,774 posts)because the right doesnt live in reality now.
stopbush
(24,595 posts)and putting make believe on an equal footing with facts. Its all there in the Buy-bull.
The Rs simply hitched their political fortunes to the fantasies, and that decision has paid dividends.
Barry Goldwater warned us about these Christians years ago. We should have listened.
ConnorMarc
(653 posts)But the thing is, these people are not Christians.
They're anything but that. They're radical far rightwing reactionary partisans.
Plain and simple.
stopbush
(24,595 posts)Tired of the excuse that Christians behaving as Christians are somehow not Christians.
When a "Christian" minister essentially calls for a civil war to protect a lawless president, he's hardly acting as Jesus would. The minister's followers are just as bad.
stopbush
(24,595 posts)PJMcK
(22,640 posts)Something about beating plowshares into swords, right?
DBoon
(22,967 posts)In addition to Fox and AM blowhards, ministers also provide political commentaries disguised as preaching.
The Southern Baptist Convention was largely apolitical until the late 1970s.
You tell someone they will burn in hell forever for voting (D), you have someone who will vote against reality.
Kid Berwyn
(17,443 posts)Theres Internet and the Facebook now.
Based on Watergate, I think well see Trumps base of support shrink to poll at around 20%.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)as President.
babylonsister
(171,473 posts)Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)that sticking up for this insanity will cost them re-election
GusBob
(7,475 posts)Trump is using what happened to Nixon as a guideline
Especially attacking the press
I think Roy Cohn taught him some stuff