General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTucker Carlson Signals Shift In Trump Defense
Indefensible he is.
https://politicalwire.com/2019/10/04/trump-loses-tucker-carlson/
Tucker Carlson Signals Shift In Trump Defense
October 4, 2019 at 9:59 pm EDT By Taegan Goddard
Like a lot of things Trump does, it was pretty over-the-top. Our leaders official actions should not be about politics. Those two things need to remain separate. Once those in control of our government use it to advance their political goals, we become just another of the worlds many corrupt countries. America is better than that.
Benjy Sarlin: Theres a pretty massive tactical signal here, which is to pivot away from defending the behavior (which has been a brutal slog so far for those whove tried) and instead toward arguing impeachment goes too far.
mucifer
(23,530 posts)lindysalsagal
(20,670 posts)MurrayDelph
(5,293 posts)We all know impeachment is only for Democrats dissembling about blowjobs.
lindysalsagal
(20,670 posts)DFW
(54,349 posts)It is kind of a stretch to say that an impeachment of Trump would go too far.
PJMcK
(22,031 posts)Just in case the impeachment inquiry gains even more traction as more and more evidence of Trump's malfeasance is exposed, Fox needs to have a path forward. If they slowly lead their audience, the rubes won't see how they're being manipulated yet again.
When the impeachment process moves to the full House, Fox will need to keep their pathways open. It's all business to the Murdochs.
DFW
(54,349 posts)If the wind seems to be blowing in the wrong direction, Fox can always shift and say, well, of course, if he did THAT......
Garrett78
(10,721 posts)kentuck
(111,079 posts)Bill Clinton should have known better. He was impeached for lying about a blowjob.
Trump is different. He doesn't know better. He didn't know that using taxpayers money to swap for information from foreign countries on his political opponents was wrong.
Is that the argument?
rurallib
(62,406 posts)paying hush money during a campaign or any of a hundred different things. I mean. who could know any of that?
pwb
(11,261 posts)He asked Russia, Ukraine, and just kidding around, China. No, he didn't know any better doesn't stick. He still thinks he can go even further, challenge everything to its breaking point. Especially laws that govern regular people.
Fox knows plenty of independents voted for trump to give him a try and are not happy at all so they are trying to say that he is just stupid. Independents don't want stupid. IMO.
Baitball Blogger
(46,700 posts)ordinary white privilege. Yes, he is bad, yes his behavior is over the top, but impeachment would hurt the nation.
WTF?
Buckeyeblue
(5,499 posts)They'll argue that what Trump did was horrible. But removing him would be too divisive for the nation.
And when they make that comment we need to ask them if they plan on supporting his reelection? If they say yes, that contradicts their impeachment reasoning.
It seems to me if they want to make that argument they need some big time players to challenge him for the nomination.
Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)Imagine what will happen if Tucker is on the Trump bandwagon when it goes over a cliff. He is giving himself a way out when the inevitable happens. It's a typical Tucker Carlson chickenshit move where he gets to ride the fence so he can claim the intellectual high ground when Trump flames out. Even he has to know it's a very strong possibility and he's already planning his strategy post Trump.
TeamPooka
(24,221 posts)No more freebies