Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

andym

(5,443 posts)
Sun Oct 6, 2019, 07:13 PM Oct 2019

Does Trump's transcript/memo basically demonstrate a direct violation of federal law?

5 CFR § 2635.702 - Use of public office for private gain. An employee shall not use or permit the use of his Government position or title or any authority associated with his public office in a manner that is intended to coerce or induce another person, including a subordinate, to provide any benefit, financial or otherwise, to himself...

In the Ukraine memo/transcript first Trump asks for some (personal) favors, Trump then says “There’s a lot of talk about Biden’s son, that Biden stopped the prosecution and a lot of people want to find out about that so whatever you can do with the Attorney General would be great...”

Seems to be a clear violation of the law. No quid pro quo required.

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Does Trump's transcript/memo basically demonstrate a direct violation of federal law? (Original Post) andym Oct 2019 OP
George Stephanopoulos and Gym Jordan discussed this on George's show today. blueinredohio Oct 2019 #1

blueinredohio

(6,797 posts)
1. George Stephanopoulos and Gym Jordan discussed this on George's show today.
Sun Oct 6, 2019, 07:41 PM
Oct 2019

Gym said Schiff only released select texts from Volker. I waited for George to say but Trump released select parts of his phone call with Ukraine so what's the difference? Didn't happen. Why don't they call these people out on their lies?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Does Trump's transcript/m...