General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIf Hillary Clinton had won and took office, do you think she would have renominated Merrick Garland?
Or do you think she would have nominated her own pick to the Supreme Court? Also, since the Senate Republicans retained their majority, do you think Mitch would have help up the vote for four years? That might have been a lot to do, there would be huge backlash.
bigbrother05
(5,995 posts)He knew Garland was a moderate candidate and HRC would likely have withdrawn him for a more liberal Justice.
No way he could justify waiting 4 years and would have likely lost the Senate in 2018 if he tried.
BeyondGeography
(39,367 posts)Obama did everything he could to meet the Republicans half-way and they still treated him and Garlands like human fire hydrants.
LonePirate
(13,414 posts)NewJeffCT
(56,828 posts)and judge, I have a feeling that she would have nominated somebody younger and a little to the left of the center/left Garland to get the activist base fired up for her or him.
and, she likely would have tried to get around #MoscowMitch in advance - maybe putting a time limit on the nomination or similar (i.e., if hearings and a vote are not scheduled within 60 days, we consider Advise and Consent to have been waived)
Caliman73
(11,728 posts)If she had not been cheated out of her legitimate election, she would have chosen a nominee of her own, not someone else's and not a compromise nominee. McConnell would definitely try to hold it up. He actually said as much. It would likely have cost him his job and the Senate for Republicans. Holding up a nominee for years is beyond the pale.
Buckeyeblue
(5,499 posts)Not only would there have been no SC or federal judges confirmed, she would have been under multiple investigations for anything and everything. And she would have had Trump calling her crooked Hillary everyday.
But you know what? Things would be a million times better than they are right now.
Polybius
(15,373 posts)Would she win? Would Trump run again? Probably, but the Party would blame him for the loss. Probably Cruz gets the nomination.
Buckeyeblue
(5,499 posts)With the economy the way it is (which has nothing to do with Trump) I think she would be more popular than people think. I think the country would have got to know her and people that were on the fence would like her.
Polybius
(15,373 posts)Hasn't happened since FDR and into Truman.
Tommy_Carcetti
(43,166 posts)In the alternate universe where Hillary is president, Ruth Bader Ginsberg is almost certainly retired at this point.
Polybius
(15,373 posts)I think she would have stuck with Garland as the safe choice. I think if Mitch allowed him to go through, at least 10 Republicans would have supported him.
However, if she nominated a 45 year old clone of Ginsburg, there is no way that nominee gets confirmed with 52 Republicans sitting in the Senate.
TheRealNorth
(9,475 posts)Moscow Mitch signaled his intent to hold the seat open indefinitely had a Democrat won.