General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums***This is important bc Eisenberg is the guy who moved the Trump transcript to the TS server
Last edited Mon Oct 14, 2019, 11:43 PM - Edit history (1)
DOJ decision not to investigate after whistleblower complaint referred more alarmingNEW: Fiona Hill told House impeachment investigators that John Bolton ordered her to notify a WH lawyer that Giuliani was working with Mick Mulvaney on a rogue operation with legal implications
(Also was key behind Section 702 stuff just ruled a 4A violation.)
Hill said Bolton instructed her to talk to NSC lawyer John Eisenberg. A spox for Bolton didnt immediately respond to request for comment
so nsc lawyer john eisenberg knew everything when cia general counsel brought him whistleblower notification, before complaint
And Eisenberg has very quietly been the key person in this cover-up (and a key player in the cover-up of Russia). He's the guy who decided to place the transcript onto the TS server to hide the crimes.
Also, Hill focused attention on Mulvaney. I'll get into why that's so important. But it's the detail that will lead Republicans to vote to convict.
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
Hill also said Bolton made the following statements to her
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
Leghorn21
(13,524 posts)Well well, sup MULVANEY
WOW YOU PACK OF LOSER LAMEBRAINS, CHEEZUS
Jarqui
(10,123 posts)and "I'm not part of whatever drug deal Rudy and Mulvaney are cooking up"
Earth to Liz Cheney and Leningrad Lindsey: how do you spin that .. credibly?
Rhetorical question.
triron
(21,999 posts)Looks like he was in on the coverup.
OldRed2450
(710 posts)This is getting good.
grantcart
(53,061 posts)3Hotdogs
(12,372 posts)phleshdef
(11,936 posts)He will always be a piece of shit for the roles he played in our most recent wars. But he isn't stupid. He isn't about to sacrifice his own clout or legacy to someone like Trump, whom I doubt he ever respected to begin with. Bolton probably went in there thinking he could take control and get Trump on the neocon track but it didn't work out that way and Trump was blatantly breaking laws right in front of him. He is an asshole but is also part of an asshole old guard that didn't function that way.
Thekaspervote
(32,755 posts)Lock him up.
(6,925 posts)... and ... too many similarities?
stopdiggin
(11,296 posts)Never any love lost .. but Bolton (like others) thought he could "contain" and "control" the Trump agenda. Turns out there isn't really any Trump agenda. Trump just does sh*t (much like a bratty child) .. and then tries to pretend either 1) he didn't do it, or 2) that was what he planned to do all along ..., because, blah, blah, blah, blah
3Hotdogs
(12,372 posts)Crash2Parties
(6,017 posts)And really didn't like the way the administration kept getting distracted by trumps short attention span.
2naSalit
(86,536 posts)FM123
(10,053 posts)hedda_foil
(16,372 posts)NCLefty
(3,678 posts)Link to tweet
Hermit-The-Prog
(33,324 posts)Wonder why the Coward-In-Chief would be so concerned about Spicer's performance.
Wawannabe
(5,643 posts)Was appointed by Michael Flynn
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Eisenberg
Leghorn21
(13,524 posts)Thanks for pertinent info, MAN oh MAN
kentuck
(111,079 posts)<snip>
Eisenberg is one of two of the Presidents lawyers who reviewed intelligence documents gathered by Ezra Cohen-Watnick and leaked to Representative Devin Nunes, chair of the House Committee on Intelligence. Eisenberg, along with Michael Ellis, another White House Council lawyer who previously worked for Nunes, allegedly believed the classified material would be helpful in proving President Trumps unsubstantiated claim he had been wiretapped by the Obama administration.
Progressive Jones
(6,011 posts)I suspect more people are lining up.
dchill
(38,471 posts)...for goblins, hobgoblins and demons?
JudyM
(29,233 posts)RockRaven
(14,958 posts)or at least be prosecuted, whatever the outcome may be once a jury is involved.
stopdiggin
(11,296 posts)RockRaven
(14,958 posts)misdemeanor or felony, don't matter -- if ya "do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy" ya done fucked yourself. 18 USC 371
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/371
I don't know, personally, what he did or did not do exactly. But obstruction or misprision of felony, or conspiracy to do the same, seem like possibilities given the general scenario.
The minute you have investigators and prosecutors who have a) integrity and b) free rein, people who obviously enabled criminal behavior, or covered it up after the fact, are totally screwed (in a just world, which obviously we are not living in, entirely). That is part of the M.O. of life-long criminals like Trump; enmesh as many people as you can in your own misdeeds, because they will then have a personal self-interest in covering up and obstructing, and you reap those rewards without owing any specific favors...
stopdiggin
(11,296 posts)him specifically being the one to order transcripts locked down. And whether that was a criminal action.
Thanks for the response.
Mc Mike
(9,114 posts)gab13by13
(21,304 posts)to be a guy who will crack like a dropped egg. These "tough guys" are really cowards.
MFGsunny
(2,356 posts)... in their respective capacity and competence to speak truth to power.
A grateful nation should continue to sing your praises!
Tommy_Carcetti
(43,173 posts)....it would be the finest example of poetic justice I could ever remember.