Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

CloudWatcher

(1,846 posts)
Thu Oct 17, 2019, 04:47 PM Oct 2019

Question about G-7 summit at Doral

So Trump's corruption is just in-your-face now, not even trying to hide it ...

Trump has awarded next year’s G-7 summit of world leaders to his Miami-area resort, the White House said

The US has laws banning giving bribes. And before we turned into a 3rd-world dictatorship, they were actually enforced (at least when abuses were discovered).

My question: how many of the other G-7 countries would be prohibited by their own laws from attending the summit, given that they would be publicly giving money directly to Trump?

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Question about G-7 summit at Doral (Original Post) CloudWatcher Oct 2019 OP
world leaders need to BOYCOTT MFM008 Oct 2019 #1
Article 1, Section 9, Clause 8. Voltaire2 Oct 2019 #2
Consent of the Congress CloudWatcher Oct 2019 #3
implicit consent is not much of an argument Voltaire2 Oct 2019 #4
Agreed CloudWatcher Oct 2019 #5

Voltaire2

(13,015 posts)
2. Article 1, Section 9, Clause 8.
Thu Oct 17, 2019, 05:11 PM
Oct 2019

No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.


CloudWatcher

(1,846 posts)
3. Consent of the Congress
Thu Oct 17, 2019, 05:19 PM
Oct 2019

What a loophole! An argument could be said that by not impeaching and removing him from office, Congress is implicitly giving consent.

This is obviously an impeachable offense. My question is how strong are the laws against giving bribes in the other six countries? I.e. he could give a G-7 summit and have nobody show up.

Voltaire2

(13,015 posts)
4. implicit consent is not much of an argument
Thu Oct 17, 2019, 05:50 PM
Oct 2019

the clause requires an action by congress, not inaction.

Although failure to impeach amounts to the same thing, as the only enforcement of this section is congress through impeachment.

CloudWatcher

(1,846 posts)
5. Agreed
Thu Oct 17, 2019, 05:57 PM
Oct 2019

I am beyond pissed Congress didn't impeach and remove him the day he took office w/out having released his taxes or actually put his investments into a blind trust. He was obviously corrupt the day he took office.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Question about G-7 summit...