Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jsr

(7,712 posts)
Mon Sep 3, 2012, 05:37 PM Sep 2012

Study Questions Advantages of Organic Foods

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/04/science/earth/study-questions-advantages-of-organic-meat-and-produce.html

September 3, 2012
Study Questions Advantages of Organic Foods
By KENNETH CHANG

... Stanford University scientists have weighed in on the “maybe not” side of the debate after an extensive examination of four decades of research comparing organic and conventional foods.

They concluded that fruits and vegetables labeled organic were, on average, no more nutritious than their conventional counterparts, which tend to be far less expensive. Nor were they any less likely to be contaminated by dangerous bacteria like E. coli.

The researchers also found no obvious health advantages to eating organic meats.

Conventional fruits and vegetables did have more pesticide residue, but the levels were almost always under the allowed safety limits, the scientists said. The Environmental Protection Agency sets the limits at levels it says do not harm humans. ...
18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Study Questions Advantages of Organic Foods (Original Post) jsr Sep 2012 OP
" at levels it says do not harm humans.... " tjdee Sep 2012 #1
Nutrition is only one of the reasons people buy organic produce. surrealAmerican Sep 2012 #2
Sigh. Yet another one of these clueless studies. GoCubsGo Sep 2012 #3
I have seen claims that organic is more nutritious XemaSab Sep 2012 #13
Plant secondary metabolites (defense compounds) were my master's thesis research. Drahthaardogs Sep 2012 #17
Good to know! XemaSab Sep 2012 #18
Did they test for sustainability? The Midway Rebel Sep 2012 #4
Sorry, but I have to disagree. Frustratedlady Sep 2012 #5
I can attest to that Lydia Leftcoast Sep 2012 #10
A different subject. ag_dude Sep 2012 #16
*almost* always under the allowed safety limits. nilram Sep 2012 #6
Rinsing fruits and vegetables well does just fine to remove pesticide residue. randome Sep 2012 #7
Exactly jsr Sep 2012 #11
Yeah. Define 'organic'. randome Sep 2012 #12
They should be called on that. Frustratedlady Sep 2012 #14
Cost is a big issue Freddie Sep 2012 #8
What did they say about the effect of pesticides on babies and young children? vanlassie Sep 2012 #9
The organic label is pretty much bullshit on a federal level cali Sep 2012 #15

tjdee

(18,048 posts)
1. " at levels it says do not harm humans.... "
Mon Sep 3, 2012, 05:40 PM
Sep 2012

exactly.

I'm sorry, but I don't want anything that KILLS something to be on my food and I don't trust the EPA either, tbh.

That said, organic everything is more expensive so I get what I can afford

surrealAmerican

(11,360 posts)
2. Nutrition is only one of the reasons people buy organic produce.
Mon Sep 3, 2012, 05:47 PM
Sep 2012

I suspect any nutritional benefit would be minor, but it's still better for the land, and generally better tasting.

GoCubsGo

(32,079 posts)
3. Sigh. Yet another one of these clueless studies.
Mon Sep 3, 2012, 05:52 PM
Sep 2012

My reply to this study is, "No shit, Sherlock." Nobody ever claimed that organic food was "more nutritious" than their non-organic counterparts. That is not the point of using organic produce, as the article points out. And, so what if there are allegedly "safe" levels of pesticides on conventional produce. One would think a PhD in the health field would understand that pesticides accumulate in body fat, so over the years, one's load can become quite high. Especially, if a person regularly eats the amounts of fruits and vegetables that the experts claim we need. I'll give lots of credit to the author of the article for pointing out all the flaws in the reasoning of this study.

XemaSab

(60,212 posts)
13. I have seen claims that organic is more nutritious
Mon Sep 3, 2012, 06:59 PM
Sep 2012

The thinking is that because the plant is subjected to stresses from insects and it's not "eating" the nutrient equivalent of candy, the plant is producing more chemicals to combat insects and also more chemicals that give the plant flavor. Even though it's not known what the nutritional benefits of these chemicals are, since it's better to eat a wider array of foods, a homegrown tomato provides more complex nutrients than a factory-farmed tomato.

(I got a C in O-chem, so sorry for teh vague.)

Drahthaardogs

(6,843 posts)
17. Plant secondary metabolites (defense compounds) were my master's thesis research.
Mon Sep 3, 2012, 07:33 PM
Sep 2012

There is nothing nutritious about them. Just the opposite really. Many plants will try to find ways to make them less nutritious (usually through palatability) to avoid predation.

The Midway Rebel

(2,191 posts)
4. Did they test for sustainability?
Mon Sep 3, 2012, 05:54 PM
Sep 2012

Because that is the REAL issue with organic food production. Everything else is spin.

Frustratedlady

(16,254 posts)
5. Sorry, but I have to disagree.
Mon Sep 3, 2012, 06:12 PM
Sep 2012

The best chicken you can buy is free-range that has been raised on the ground and allowed to move around without cages and breathe fresh air and pick up the natural grit they need to digest their food.

If you ever have a chance to see them side by side with the usual corporate chicken you won't believe it. Better color, more meat on the bones and skin that isn't pale.

Fruits and veggies that are modified to be able to ripen enroute and have long shelf life are no comparison to the same grown organically. Maybe the organic isn't as pretty as the corporate crap, but it is safer and better tasting.

Lydia Leftcoast

(48,217 posts)
10. I can attest to that
Mon Sep 3, 2012, 06:44 PM
Sep 2012

When I was in Cuba, we visited an ecumenical Protestant seminary that began growing its own food during the "special period" of the early 1990s and never quit.

We had lunch there, and the entire lunch (roast chicken, salad, vegetable soup, black beans) except for the rice was grown on the seminary grounds. There were chickens running around outside, so we knew where our roast chicken had come from, and I must say, the roast chicken we ate that day was a revelation. It had depth and richness of flavor that you just don't find in conventional American chicken, even though the cooks hadn't done anything special to it. (Cubans aren't much into spices or fancy sauces.)

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
7. Rinsing fruits and vegetables well does just fine to remove pesticide residue.
Mon Sep 3, 2012, 06:18 PM
Sep 2012

I am in favor of less pesticides and more nutritious food but I think the truth is that most food, on the whole, that is labeled as 'organic' is not better than 'regular' foods.

It was inevitable that the tag 'organic' would be abused. Such is the nature of corporations.

Frustratedlady

(16,254 posts)
14. They should be called on that.
Mon Sep 3, 2012, 07:03 PM
Sep 2012

When we raised hydroponic tomatoes, we looked into qualifying for organic and the requirements to be approved USDA Organic were huge. I rather doubt any product raised in China would qualify.

Mexico was sending tomatoes up that were raised in the field, but stamped as hydroponic, sprayed heavily and shipped green. The hydroponic association got on them about it. What did they do? They covered the field with netting, shipped them over the border to Texas and had them labeled as being packed in Texas but no mention of origin. Mexico, at that time at least, did not rule out DDT or other toxic sprays.

Freddie

(9,259 posts)
8. Cost is a big issue
Mon Sep 3, 2012, 06:35 PM
Sep 2012

I will only buy organic if the product tastes better and is worth the extra $$.
I notice in my supermarket's "reduced for quick sale" section among the dented boxes is often natural/organic products like snacks and cereal near their sell-by dates that don't exactly fly off the shelves.

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
15. The organic label is pretty much bullshit on a federal level
Mon Sep 3, 2012, 07:06 PM
Sep 2012

I'm sorry folks but it really is and no, it doesn't necessarily designate happy free range chickens or sustainably raised crops. As someone pointed out your organic food could well come from China. (For instance, most "organic" garlic is produced in China)

So what can you do? Regional organic designations can help you choose wisely: (Please click the link)

http://www.nofa.org/

In season, farmers markets are, as everyone knows, a great resource.

Local is as important as organic in many places.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Study Questions Advantage...