HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » So, there really isn't a ...

Mon Nov 18, 2019, 09:10 AM

So, there really isn't a REAL transcript of the July 25th call?

Or is there?

Always assumed that there was a transcript (call it Transcript 1). That they used voice recognition software and then cleaned that up as you would if you used your cell phone mic to create a text message.

Then under pressure thought trump got Barr to do more clean up to create a Transcript 2 that he released.

Always assumed that Transcript 1 was on the secure server and that we had subpoenaed it and would eventually see it.

Per WSJ..
He (Morrison) said he approached White House lawyers after the call ended to ask whether the rough transcript should be closely guarded to prevent its contents from becoming public. The transcript of the call, which was later released by the White House after questions were raised about the conversation, was ultimately placed on a secure server typically reserved for national-security secrets.


This sounds like there is really only one. In fact if you click on the link with the WSJ story you will see the one that dingbat released.

11 replies, 1267 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 11 replies Author Time Post
Reply So, there really isn't a REAL transcript of the July 25th call? (Original post)
Laura PourMeADrink Nov 2019 OP
5X Nov 2019 #1
gab13by13 Nov 2019 #3
gab13by13 Nov 2019 #2
Laura PourMeADrink Nov 2019 #5
California_Republic Nov 2019 #4
Laura PourMeADrink Nov 2019 #6
Chin music Nov 2019 #9
ProudMNDemocrat Nov 2019 #7
crickets Nov 2019 #8
Chin music Nov 2019 #10
Laura PourMeADrink Nov 2019 #11

Response to Laura PourMeADrink (Original post)

Mon Nov 18, 2019, 09:20 AM

1. I would classify that as lazy reporting, if that is all they have in the article.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 5X (Reply #1)

Mon Nov 18, 2019, 09:23 AM

3. Not to allow the public to see the transcript

of the phone call, but to hide it, to me isn't lazy, it's down right damning.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Laura PourMeADrink (Original post)

Mon Nov 18, 2019, 09:20 AM

2. The most opaque administration in our history,

We only get to see redacted or edited documents. When are we going to see the Mueller report, the grand jury testimony?

With what was released one can only imagine the incriminating evidence in the complete documents.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to gab13by13 (Reply #2)

Mon Nov 18, 2019, 09:34 AM

5. But Morrison is implying that there never really was

A true and full transcript.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/11/16/us/politics/impeachment-trump.html

Mr. Morrison had a different reaction. He testified he found nothing inherently problematic about the call, but he still went to White House lawyers to express concerns that a record of the call could leak and would be unflattering for the president. He recommended that access to it be limited, and eventually a reconstructed transcript was placed on the White House’s most secure server.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Laura PourMeADrink (Original post)

Mon Nov 18, 2019, 09:28 AM

4. Just Transcripts, notes, don't you think there is an audio recording?


“This is a really important call. Everyone take good notes “. “ how about we record it?”

Duh.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to California_Republic (Reply #4)

Mon Nov 18, 2019, 09:41 AM

6. Don't know anymore. Remember reading when this

First came out that they would have used voice recognition software during meeting. But no one mentioning that lately. But if you read even Trump's version, it's written like it's verbatim. Note from notes. If it were from notes the tone would be, "at that point the president said something like..."

Why does this matter? Strikes me that it does in that there wouldn't be a document of truth to eventually see. It would all be based on individual recollections.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to California_Republic (Reply #4)


Response to Laura PourMeADrink (Original post)

Mon Nov 18, 2019, 10:28 AM

7. But what about the Stenographers?

Where is their notes?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Laura PourMeADrink (Original post)

Mon Nov 18, 2019, 11:05 AM

8. There was a digital record at one time, and it should still be on the sekrit server,

but who knows? I'm curious as to why no one has locked that down - or maybe someone has, and we aren't being told about it for whatever reason. Here's a pretty in-depth discussion from earlier this month:

https://www.democraticunderground.com/100212651353

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to crickets (Reply #8)


Response to crickets (Reply #8)

Mon Nov 18, 2019, 10:09 PM

11. Me too. You know those MFs will be trying to delete

remove any really damaging stuff. Bet the real criminals including MF45 would be super guilty there

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread