Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Laura PourMeADrink

(42,770 posts)
Tue Sep 4, 2012, 11:58 PM Sep 2012

WaPo...Winners and Losers - Speeches tonight

DON'T FORGET TO DONATE WITH FELLOW DU'ERS !!

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2012/09/04/democratic-national-convention-day-one-winners-and-losers/

WINNERS
* Julian Castro: The mayor of San Antonio was one of the least known keynote speakers in modern memory but his performance on Tuesday night showed why the Obama campaign placed a big bet on his ability. Castro’s story — and his reverence for his mom — was touching and heartfelt. His attacks on former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney were effective but not mean-spirited or overly partisan. The political road forward is somewhat unclear for Castro — Texas remains a solidly Republican state — but he very clearly established himself as a national rising star with his speech tonight.

* Deval Patrick: Patrick was overlooked by many people — the Fix included — who were scanning the night’s speaker to see who might shine on the first night of the convention. But, the Massachusetts governor did shine with an address that will almost certainly stoke some chatter about whether he should be in the mix for 2016.

* Ted Strickland: The former Ohio governor didn’t throw red meat to the crowd. He wore a red meat suit. It was, without question, the most rankly partisan speech of either convention but man oh man was it effective. Strickland’s address was larded with quotable lines that will get play on the morning shows and cable television tomorrow; “If Mitt Romney was Santa Claus, he would fire the reindeer and outsource the elves,” Strickland said to raucous applause from the crowd. Make no mistake: There will be some folks in the Democratic strategist community who will wonder after tonight’s speech why they didn’t choose Strickland to be Democratic National Committee chairman.

* 2nd half of Michelle Obama’s speech: The First Lady started quite slowly — more on that below. But, by the time 10:45 p.m. (or so) rolled around, Michelle Obama was hitting her rhetorical stride — with a testimonial about the impact (or lack thereof) that the presidency has had on her husband. “Being president doesn’t change who you are. It reveals who you are,” Obama said in her best line of the speech. Michelle Obama is already a beloved figure among Democrats and many independents and the way she finished her speech will do nothing to lessen those feelings.

* Signage: The Democratic convention-planners deserve credit. When Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley got to the podium, the crowd was immediately peppered with “Forward” and “Not Back” signs. Nice advance work.

* Julian Castro’s daughter: That is one cute kid. Seriously.

LOSERS
* Kathleen Sebelius: Remember when the former Kansas governor was talked about as a potential vice presidential pick? Her speech at the convention was remarkably flat and she rushed through both her planned applause lines and “big” finish. Just not very good.

* Martin O’Malley: O’Malley came into his speech tonight with high expectations. He has made little secret of his interest in higher office and that he was given a 10 pm speaking slot suggests that the convention planners thought he would deliver. Those expectations turned out to be too high. O’Malley’s enthusiasm and passion came across as manufactured not organic and the crowd seemed ready to love him but wound up just sort of liking him.

* The 1st half of Michelle Obama’s speech: The First Lady started quite slowly with the crowd seemingly waiting to explode but never really being given the chance to do so. The first part of her speech also felt like somewhat warmed-over rhetoric from the 2008 campaign. But, as we noted above, she did warm to the task and, in truth, how she finished almost certainly matters more than how she started.

* Billionaires: The super-wealthy came in for a regular bashing from the Democratic podium on Tuesday night. Of course, for all of the rhetorical hits they took, billionaires are still billionaires. So they have that going for them.

16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
WaPo...Winners and Losers - Speeches tonight (Original Post) Laura PourMeADrink Sep 2012 OP
Fuck the Washington post. /nt still_one Sep 2012 #1
why...objectively...I agree Laura PourMeADrink Sep 2012 #2
They were wrong about the first lady, but I have written them off a long time ago, when they still_one Sep 2012 #3
I think Michelle did repeat a lot from former speeches....but maybe I am just Laura PourMeADrink Sep 2012 #16
Kathleen Sibelius is who she is BeyondGeography Sep 2012 #4
No mention of Tammy or Lilly or Stacey? C'mon. They were fantastic. nt valerief Sep 2012 #5
Martin O'Malley's only problem Freddie Sep 2012 #6
Yes, exactly OmahaBlueDog Sep 2012 #7
I thought all of Michelle's speech was good. mvd Sep 2012 #8
Correction - I think It was O'Malley who did the forward, not back mvd Sep 2012 #10
Glaring omission - Winner: Tammy Duckworth OmahaBlueDog Sep 2012 #9
Agree on Tammy Duckworth & Lilly Ledbetter! NYC Liberal Sep 2012 #13
Julian Castro's daughter's hair-flip JaneyVee Sep 2012 #11
Cute! ellisonz Sep 2012 #14
super. can you tell me exactly how you got that clip? I have wondered Laura PourMeADrink Sep 2012 #15
Yeah I agree with most of this. I think like others have said, NYC Liberal Sep 2012 #12

still_one

(92,061 posts)
3. They were wrong about the first lady, but I have written them off a long time ago, when they
Wed Sep 5, 2012, 12:06 AM
Sep 2012

Were taking great pains to dis the Dems at every opportunity, without the same balance toward the republicans

 

Laura PourMeADrink

(42,770 posts)
16. I think Michelle did repeat a lot from former speeches....but maybe I am just
Wed Sep 5, 2012, 01:17 AM
Sep 2012

a junkie and have heard it all before.

BeyondGeography

(39,345 posts)
4. Kathleen Sibelius is who she is
Wed Sep 5, 2012, 12:08 AM
Sep 2012

Everyone knows she won't give a stemwinder. It was a good, straightforward presentation on what ACA is doing for people. You can't say she lost what she never will have as a speaker.

Rahm should be on the loser list, IMO. I do agree that O'Malley underperformed.

Freddie

(9,256 posts)
6. Martin O'Malley's only problem
Wed Sep 5, 2012, 12:14 AM
Sep 2012

Was appearing *after* Deval Patrick!
Both great but Patrick is a true talent as a speaker IMO. Really want to see more of him on the national stage.

mvd

(65,158 posts)
8. I thought all of Michelle's speech was good.
Wed Sep 5, 2012, 12:16 AM
Sep 2012

Strickland was good with that forward, not back slogan. Rahm and O'Malley were ok, but ok beats almost all of the Repuke speeches. Why can't they just call it a winning night for us?

mvd

(65,158 posts)
10. Correction - I think It was O'Malley who did the forward, not back
Wed Sep 5, 2012, 12:48 AM
Sep 2012

That was effective and a perfect slogan.

OmahaBlueDog

(10,000 posts)
9. Glaring omission - Winner: Tammy Duckworth
Wed Sep 5, 2012, 12:19 AM
Sep 2012

What she lacked in sweeping oratory she more than made up with a compelling personal narrative.

Lilly Ledbetter was great as well -- not that she had anything to win.

O'Malley wasn't bad - he just wasn't Deval Patrick

Sebelius was pretty standard -- nothing horrid, just nothing stellar.

 

Laura PourMeADrink

(42,770 posts)
15. super. can you tell me exactly how you got that clip? I have wondered
Wed Sep 5, 2012, 01:16 AM
Sep 2012

how people do that. Saw something on cnn....but it never went to youtube.com so I couldn't post here

NYC Liberal

(20,135 posts)
12. Yeah I agree with most of this. I think like others have said,
Wed Sep 5, 2012, 12:56 AM
Sep 2012

O’Malley followed Deval Patrick, who set the bar really, really high. I wouldn't call him a loser for it. He was good.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»WaPo...Winners and Losers...