American perspective vs. English perspective on London Bridge incident

[packman]

[mwooldri]

1. Not totally unarmed.

Chairs, fire extinguishers, narwal tusks... Yes, narwal tusks.

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-50621581

[DavidDvorkin]

2. Wow! Great response.

[Qutzupalotl]

3. If unlimited firearms had been available in London, the terrorist would have

bought an AR-15 like the San Bernardino shooters and killed a bunch more people before being taken down.

[Salviati]

4. Exactly this

While I'm not completely opposed to private ownership of firearms, ownership for the purpose of "protecting" oneself in public is completely delusional.

[Hermit-The-Prog]

5. or, 50 Londoners caught in crossfire as citizens fire AR-15s at fake terrorist

[DBoon]

8. This American thinks the British should be glad they don't have guns

Two people killed would be a godsend for us, after multiple massacres with firearms

They should be glas terrorists only have access to knives

[Volaris]

9. Right? A 'mass knifing' consists of what?, five victims?, and a guy with a narwhal tusk.

If that fucker had been in 'murica, it would have taken a SWAT Team to take him down.

we should BE so lucky.

[a la izquierda]

6. The stupidity is mindblowing

I’m in England right now and not one person wishes anyone had guns the other day.

[UniteFightBack]

7. This is SOME in America's perspective. To title the OP this way gives them all the power. Fuck that

and no thanks.

[packman]

10. You 're right

I should have titled it "One's American's perspective"