Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

dustyscamp

(2,223 posts)
7. He may not be a good guy to you, but you can't say he hasn't done anything good for the party
Tue Dec 3, 2019, 01:28 AM
Dec 2019
froggerslogger

I was just talking to another local dem after the local debate watching party this week about Steyer. I’m not sure why he needs to be in the debates, but I am appreciative that he could at least be a billionaire voice in favor of a wealth tax and a serious addressing of inequality. That might be worth it to me.

But I also want to say that I live in a tiny coastal town and Steyer has absolutely been throwing his money behind local democrats all over the country. A couple of years ago we had three of five seats open in our local port races, and Steyer’s PAC hired a full time community organizer and campaign manager to come up and run the campaigns. They also helped with other local elections organizing campaigning and messaging, training new canvassers, and organizing media campaigns. Locally we have timber and industrial interests who would love to dominate the port and have played a large part in running the place into the ground over the last 20 years.

Thanks in part to the help of Steyer we won all three of those seats, and three years later we are finally seeing some progress at our Port.

So while I think there might be good reasons to question his candidacy, I also think it’s inaccurate to paint him as someone who isn’t helping in other ways or is just out to feed his own ego or something.

https://www.reddit.com/r/democrats/comments/dj7glj/tom_steyer_has_spent_476_million_on_his/

https://www.forbes.com/sites/angelauyeung/2018/11/09/how-billionaire-tom-steyers-123-million-made-a-difference-in-the-midterms/#58c889413ed1

Steyer, who went from hedge fund manager to environmental and political activist, spent the majority of the money—more than $80 million—on two efforts: Need To Impeach, his online petition and media blitz to oust Trump from office, which later included a Need To Vote initiative; and NextGen Rising, a youth voter mobilization effort.

According to political strategists, Steyer’s youth voter turnout campaign was critical and likely helped Democrats take back the House. The impeachment rally cry? Not so much.



Steyer, a consistent mega-donor to Democrats cycle after cycle, is leading efforts to impeach President Donald Trump and to combat climate change by pumping millions of dollars into races and advertising efforts through his PAC, Need to Impeach, and nonprofit organization NextGen America.

He leads every other liberal donor, including Michael Bloomberg and George Soros, contributing almost $248 million cumulatively to candidates, PACs and other political organizations. Much of that cash goes toward PACs and organizations that spend money independently of candidates, including attack ads on Republicans.

Steyer has previously considered running for office himself, floating the idea of running for U.S. House in 2016 and California governor in 2018. He made a trip to Iowa earlier this year where he was expected to announce his 2020 presidential bid. Instead he said he was not going to run in 2020, opting to use his platform to continue calling for the impeachment of President Trump. Steyer didn’t immediately give a clear reason why he reversed his decision not to run.

https://www.opensecrets.org/news/2019/07/tom-steyer-enters-2020presidential-field/

TeamPooka

(24,204 posts)
8. Steyer's impeachment ads all had one thing in common: His name mentioned 47 times in 30 seconds
Tue Dec 3, 2019, 01:38 AM
Dec 2019

He bought name recognition with his impeachment movement and then abandoned it
If he was serious he would be spending money right fucking now on ad buys to move the public on the impeachment needle but he isn't because it was all about his ego need to run for president.
he's stupid because if he did he would look altruistic and be able to take some credit for the impeachment but he didn't because he's just playing everyone
I'm sick of billionaires who think they know better than public servants who have spent their careers working for the people.
3 words disqualify this guy right away: Hedge fund manager.

Tom Steyer’s impeachment group is missing its big moment because he’s running for president
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2019/11/20/20964803/tom-steyer-2020-need-impeach-trump-hearings-presidential-campaign

TeamPooka

(24,204 posts)
4. How stupid is the Trump team? The moment those words came out of his mouth they should have bought
Tue Dec 3, 2019, 12:40 AM
Dec 2019

the domain.
Holy crap level stupidity.

TheBlackAdder

(28,163 posts)
6. It there is a Trump trademark and ill-intent of website domain acquisition, that might be contested.
Tue Dec 3, 2019, 01:24 AM
Dec 2019

.

Putin's poodle might be able to petition for it, if there is an active copyright or trademark.

It's spelled out in the UDRP https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/dndr-2012-02-25-en


And, there is: http://tmsearch.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=doc&state=4808:emktu.3.15


Word Mark KEEP AMERICA GREAT
Goods and Services IC 016. US 002 005 022 023 029 037 038 050. G & S: Bumper stickers; decorative decals for vehicle windows; stickers; advertising signs of papers; advertising signs of cardboard; placards and banners of paper or cardboard; printed publications, namely, pamphlets providing information regarding Donald J. Trump as a political candidate; posters; pens

IC 025. US 022 039. G & S: Clothing, namely, sweatshirts, T-shirts, tank tops, long sleeve shirts; headwear, namely, caps and hats; baby clothing, namely, one piece garments; children's clothing, namely, t-shirts

IC 026. US 037 039 040 042 050. G & S: Campaign buttons

IC 035. US 100 101 102. G & S: Political campaign services, namely, promoting public awareness of Donald J. Trump as a candidate for public office; providing online information regarding political issues; retail and online retail store services in connection with campaign related goods; providing a website that features Donald J. Trump views on political issues

IC 036. US 100 101 102. G & S: Political campaign services, namely, fundraising in the field of politics

IC 041. US 100 101 107. G & S: On-line journals, namely, blogs featuring information about Donald J. Trump, namely, as it relates to politics and political campaigning; providing a website featuring non-downloadable videos and photographs in the field of politics and political campaigning

IC 045. US 100 101. G & S: Online social networking services in the field of politics and political campaigning provided via a website
Standard Characters Claimed
Mark Drawing Code (4) STANDARD CHARACTER MARK
Serial Number 87305551
Filing Date January 18, 2017
Current Basis 1B
Original Filing Basis 1B
Published for Opposition June 18, 2019
Owner (APPLICANT) Donald J. Trump for President, Inc. NON-PROFIT CORPORATION VIRGINIA 725 Fifth Avenue New York NEW YORK 10022
Attorney of Record Meredith M. Wilkes
Type of Mark TRADEMARK. SERVICE MARK
Register PRINCIPAL
Live/Dead Indicator LIVE



.

JohnnyRingo

(18,614 posts)
9. I see what he's doing.
Tue Dec 3, 2019, 02:00 AM
Dec 2019

I bought one too but wondered why they were so cheap. There's no way Steyer will be banking campaign money on this.

Then I noticed his statement that he needs a certain number of unique donations to qualify for the debates. The amount doesn't matter. I guess he's at least smart enough to be president anyway.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Tom Steyer buys website d...