General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAfter the House Judiciary Hearings start... what I would like to see...
After the academics lay out what "high crimes and misdemeanors" means, how it connects.. etc... I want to see Chairman Nadler bangs the gavel....
"I have heard repeatedly over the last few weeks that there has been no 'due process' in these proceedings, even tho our members across the aisle had many opportunities to cross-examine witnesses. I am also aware that that The President was given the option to have his lawyers address the committees and also refused.
Therefore in the spirit of 'due process", I am adjourning these proceedings for 36 hours for the President to gather his attorneys and witnesses... and himself if he desires... and present themselves at these proceedings to fairly provide their side of the case and defend themselves against the accusations... otherwise I will assume their absence is a statement of "no contest" and we will proceed.
And Senator Graham #readthereport"
Committer stands adjourned"
hlthe2b
(102,225 posts)But, yes, I would like to put a dramatic stop to RW hypocritical whining about process.
Rosco T.
(6,496 posts)wiggs
(7,812 posts)on the chosen ones.
After almost five years of campaigning and mis-governing by this treacherous, narcissistic family there are pant-loads of impeachable offenses that the public ought to hear about. There are huge lists of administration and Trump misconduct...so many each week that we forget how bad the previous week was. I think these represent important context for considering the actual final articles. Even if each act of outrageous misconduct doesn't rise to impeachability, it doesn't mean it shouldn't be discussed in the hearing or afterwards!
Chuck Todd thinks that lack of dem messaging/propaganda is worth a whole panel segment? So dems...generate a giant list of misconduct and see if Chuck will read on air. Might take a day or two to read it all.