Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Rosco T.

(6,496 posts)
Tue Dec 3, 2019, 07:43 PM Dec 2019

After the House Judiciary Hearings start... what I would like to see...

After the academics lay out what "high crimes and misdemeanors" means, how it connects.. etc... I want to see Chairman Nadler bangs the gavel....

"I have heard repeatedly over the last few weeks that there has been no 'due process' in these proceedings, even tho our members across the aisle had many opportunities to cross-examine witnesses. I am also aware that that The President was given the option to have his lawyers address the committees and also refused.

Therefore in the spirit of 'due process", I am adjourning these proceedings for 36 hours for the President to gather his attorneys and witnesses... and himself if he desires... and present themselves at these proceedings to fairly provide their side of the case and defend themselves against the accusations... otherwise I will assume their absence is a statement of "no contest" and we will proceed.

And Senator Graham #readthereport"

Committer stands adjourned"



3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
After the House Judiciary Hearings start... what I would like to see... (Original Post) Rosco T. Dec 2019 OP
You mean the House Judiciary Hearings, I think... hlthe2b Dec 2019 #1
OOPS. Fixed Rosco T. Dec 2019 #2
I want to hear a discussion about all the POTENTIAL articles prior to settling down wiggs Dec 2019 #3

hlthe2b

(102,225 posts)
1. You mean the House Judiciary Hearings, I think...
Tue Dec 3, 2019, 07:46 PM
Dec 2019

But, yes, I would like to put a dramatic stop to RW hypocritical whining about process.

wiggs

(7,812 posts)
3. I want to hear a discussion about all the POTENTIAL articles prior to settling down
Tue Dec 3, 2019, 08:21 PM
Dec 2019

on the chosen ones.

After almost five years of campaigning and mis-governing by this treacherous, narcissistic family there are pant-loads of impeachable offenses that the public ought to hear about. There are huge lists of administration and Trump misconduct...so many each week that we forget how bad the previous week was. I think these represent important context for considering the actual final articles. Even if each act of outrageous misconduct doesn't rise to impeachability, it doesn't mean it shouldn't be discussed in the hearing or afterwards!

Chuck Todd thinks that lack of dem messaging/propaganda is worth a whole panel segment? So dems...generate a giant list of misconduct and see if Chuck will read on air. Might take a day or two to read it all.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»After the House Judiciary...