General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums****Live Impeachment hearing - THREAD 4****
Last edited Wed Dec 4, 2019, 03:37 PM - Edit history (1)
LIVEBLOG - https://www.wonkette.com/is-impeach-even-in-constitution-house-judiciary-impeachment-liveblog-day-one
BumRushDaShow
(128,712 posts)BumRushDaShow
(128,712 posts)DURHAM D
(32,607 posts)It should be.
fleur-de-lisa
(14,624 posts)BumRushDaShow
(128,712 posts)IcyPeas
(21,856 posts)victoria toensing (sp) was ranting away about jonathan turley. I couldn't continue listening but it's sickening how they all get the same talking points. can they really believe what they are espousing?
BumRushDaShow
(128,712 posts)IcyPeas
(21,856 posts)he didn't even vote for trump therefore: he must be telling the truth, right? oi are they just willfully blind to the facts?
BumRushDaShow
(128,712 posts)that he may have been the only one foolish enough to be willing to show up on their behalf. Which means even someone like Dershowitz didn't take the bait and bother (and Dershowitz does bill himself as a Constitutional scholar)!
dweller
(23,620 posts)i recall Nadler saying "in a few days"
tia
✌🏼
BumRushDaShow
(128,712 posts)They may end up doing something next week.
Link to the committee schedule - https://judiciary.house.gov/committee-activity/weekly-schedules
IcyPeas
(21,856 posts)of turley at the clinton impeachment. i love when they do this. hypocrites right on camera.
BumRushDaShow
(128,712 posts)(Turley is around my age too)
BumRushDaShow
(128,712 posts)crickets
(25,959 posts)The operative description is 'irreverent.'
https://www.wonkette.com/is-impeach-even-in-constitution-house-judiciary-impeachment-liveblog-day-one
11:41: Interesting testimony from Karlan about how insanely concerned framers were with foreign influence. It's not just this impeachment hullabaloo and Trump soliciting foreign interference in his re-election. They put the Emoluments clause in there to keep presidents from being influenced by foreign gifts. They put the "president has to be a natural-born citizen" thing in there, because they were specifically concerned about the president being susceptible to foreign influence.
(Shoulda put a "President Should Not Be Russian Asset" clause in there, but we guess that falls under the high crimes and misdemeanors they couldn't have imagined.)
11:47:
LOL:
Heres Turley in 1998. Impeaching Clinton for a blowjob was necessary to fend off anarchy." https://t.co/wQeICAYPFi
Charles P. Pierce (@CharlesPPierce) 1575477586.0
Wonkette is a hoot.
BumRushDaShow
(128,712 posts)Will add to the OP!
BumRushDaShow
(128,712 posts)nolabear
(41,956 posts)Karma13612
(4,547 posts)Of the Congress.
The repukes are shameless, classless and criminal.
BumRushDaShow
(128,712 posts)BumRushDaShow
(128,712 posts)dweller
(23,620 posts)not hearing it ...
✌🏼
BumRushDaShow
(128,712 posts)malaise
(268,845 posts)crickets
(25,959 posts)Yikes, mute button alert for the man who will not clear the frog out of his throat, never mind what he's blathering on about. Oh, it's Biden.
BumRushDaShow
(128,712 posts)Politicub
(12,165 posts)doing an excellent job of calling Turleys objectivity into question.
Laura PourMeADrink
(42,770 posts)ancianita
(36,009 posts)evidence for any of this from the Trump/Zelensky call, invoking Biden's quid quo pro as an impeachable offense.
This guy's false equivalence, along with trivializing THIS impeachment, is moronic.
He tries to get pretzel logic agreement from Turkey.
uponit7771
(90,323 posts)... their defense is to focus on the server and act like Trump never said Biden or that Biden hid the server and hacked Clinton himself or some shit.
They just gonna make it up as they go along
BumRushDaShow
(128,712 posts)The_Counsel
(1,660 posts)But nice try, asshole.
catbyte
(34,358 posts)Turley, too.
BuffaloJackalope
(818 posts)elleng
(130,825 posts)Hav
(5,969 posts)Biden did everything in the open as a representative of the US, not for his personal gain. He did what the US and the western countries wanted.
Is Turley an idiot as well? Surely he should know better about this topic.
BumRushDaShow
(128,712 posts)Asked the question to Karlan to describe this.
crickets
(25,959 posts)Blunt but effective. Her questions are getting right to the point about what Trump has done, why it is wrong regardless of his lack of success, and just how damaging it is to involve foreign powers in elections.
backtoblue
(11,343 posts)Your son is named Barron, but the president cannot *make* him a barron.
malaise
(268,845 posts)he can't make him a baron KABOOM!
BumRushDaShow
(128,712 posts)(as the answer to the difference between a "king' and a "President".)
brooklynite
(94,461 posts)brooklynite
(94,461 posts)Bayard
(22,035 posts)tRump can name his son Baron, but he can't make him a Baron.
BumRushDaShow
(128,712 posts)when it comes to crimes. There is no distinction.
BumRushDaShow
(128,712 posts)nolabear
(41,956 posts)backtoblue
(11,343 posts)Laura PourMeADrink
(42,770 posts)Us always hating trump since day 1. Trump has committed attrocities since day 1.
elleng
(130,825 posts)Mersky
(4,980 posts)We don't hate him for merely existing. It's his actions, abuses, waste, and tweeting that elicit righteous ire.
Somedays I just cannot believe someone has so much energy to be so interruptive and hostile to so many people.
crickets
(25,959 posts)Will someone please ask a Republican in this hearing, right now, to choose country over party? Never mind, we are seeing and hearing their choice. Notice this man has no questions, just bluster. It's sickening.
BumRushDaShow
(128,712 posts)And then doubling down to say that the Senate is not going to convict. Because. GOP partisanship.
crickets
(25,959 posts)BumRushDaShow
(128,712 posts)Mossfern
(2,462 posts)he's comparing a blow job with treason.
Still no questions.
ChubbyStar
(3,191 posts)Does he turn into a toad soon?
crickets
(25,959 posts)Also, somebody needs to point out the number of bills written and passed in the House (didn't they just vote on one?) that now languish in the Senate unaddressed, because Mitch McConnell won't bring them up for a vote. THAT is where things are not getting done.
BumRushDaShow
(128,712 posts)madaboutharry
(40,199 posts)All they have left is the whining.
BumRushDaShow
(128,712 posts)crickets
(25,959 posts)definition of high crimes and misdemeanors. Boom.
BumRushDaShow
(128,712 posts)The_Counsel
(1,660 posts)BumRushDaShow
(128,712 posts)The R "witness" was previously labeled a "libruullll".
Cohen is taking on Turley too.
BumRushDaShow
(128,712 posts)Wednesdays
(17,331 posts)CNN showed split screen... while Chabot was droning on, Nadler was fighting to keep from nodding off.
Bet that reflects the whole country's take on Chabot!
BumRushDaShow
(128,712 posts)crickets
(25,959 posts)That was so satisfying.
backtoblue
(11,343 posts)BumRushDaShow
(128,712 posts)elleng
(130,825 posts)Mossfern
(2,462 posts)The witnesses seemed to be able to read the report...
BuffaloJackalope
(818 posts)crickets
(25,959 posts)It's so true. The mute button is everybody's best friend right now.
The_Counsel
(1,660 posts)...even if you had three weeks to read it. Something about your aversion to facts that would keep that from happening.
gademocrat7
(10,651 posts)Gohmet blabbering
BumRushDaShow
(128,712 posts)cannabis_flower
(3,764 posts)BumRushDaShow
(128,712 posts)BumRushDaShow
(128,712 posts)crickets
(25,959 posts)to compel something from Zelensky. That emphasizes his abuse of the power of his office *as president* - not just as DJT the individual.
Mersky
(4,980 posts)It doesn't make it true.
And just because he abuses the definition of hearsay, cannot not remove the verifiable usefulness and credibility of the fact witnesses that have appeared.
___
Useless for the purposes of protecting the interests of the nation, gohmert delivered his talking points with mostly downcast eyes in reading his prepared remarks.
BumRushDaShow
(128,712 posts)BumRushDaShow
(128,712 posts)IcyPeas
(21,856 posts)BumRushDaShow
(128,712 posts)IcyPeas
(21,856 posts)but i do lower my volume
BumRushDaShow
(128,712 posts)my remote is on the other side of the table.
crickets
(25,959 posts)Pretty much tells us this is all about party lines, yet the Republican stance is that this is a Democratic witch hunt. Now he's just gonna shout for five minutes.
PA Democrat
(13,225 posts)He is like that annoying dog that won't stop barking in the middles of the night.
BumRushDaShow
(128,712 posts)have been too busy typing.
dweller
(23,620 posts)kill me now 😑
✌🏼
Gidney N Cloyd
(19,831 posts)backtoblue
(11,343 posts)BumRushDaShow
(128,712 posts)ChubbyStar
(3,191 posts)Raftergirl
(1,285 posts)running the vacuum when the Rs are up. Saves batteries in remote and gets my house clean. Win Win.
Pacifist Patriot
(24,653 posts)madaboutharry
(40,199 posts)When will Jordan stop lying?
He is so predictable and tiresome.
IcyPeas
(21,856 posts)he was the type to Highlight every sentence in yellow highlighter. making nothing really stand out.
Mossfern
(2,462 posts)I've put my tv on mute - just can't listen to Jim Jordan any more. He needs to tone down the volume - being loud doesn't make you right.
The_Counsel
(1,660 posts)I'm thinking when his turn came he would slice every GOP "argument" heard today to shreds.
Hoping Nadler is up to the task....
BumRushDaShow
(128,712 posts)crickets
(25,959 posts)but about putting country first, and how every govt official takes an oath to put national interests first. YES.
Hav
(5,969 posts)Sensenbrenner, Gohmert and now Gym Jordan. When you think it reached the lowest point, they manage to lower the bar yet again.
Sancho
(9,067 posts)Mersky
(4,980 posts)Shrieking loon with zero moral credibility to hold his gerrymandered district, let alone argue anything about the matter at hand.
Hes all antics and maneuvers. Am just stating what we already know. Am so tired of him.
The_Counsel
(1,660 posts)...he'd provide all the documents/witnesses necessary to prove his innocence, que no?
bagimin
(1,332 posts)my Representative.
ffr
(22,665 posts)Link to tweet
This is what Republicans flashed on screen. If a lawyer did this, they may face disciplinary action for such a misleading representation of what a source said.
Compare what they said my book said w/what I actually said.
BumRushDaShow
(128,712 posts)BumRushDaShow
(128,712 posts)and she goes on to note that he had never been anything other than a "reality tv show" participant so may not have understood how his actions would be considered against the interest of the U.S.
ChubbyStar
(3,191 posts)What a fucking smack down!
MerryBlooms
(11,761 posts)BumRushDaShow
(128,712 posts)Amazingly Buck has decided to ask Turley a question.
Mossfern
(2,462 posts)Amorphous?
Buck....no example of asking another country.
Gidney N Cloyd
(19,831 posts)nolabear
(41,956 posts)abused the very voters who elected him. He didnt abuse us. We knew who he was. He abused the office and were horrified. But those who voted for him? Im betting they didnt vote for this. By now a lot are so deep in the shit they cant turn around. But theyre being horribly abused.
Mossfern
(2,462 posts)Go back 200 years and impeach them.
BumRushDaShow
(128,712 posts)for "abuse of power".
And the fool is now bringing up Abraham Lincoln for "abuse of power" that could be impeachable, the suddenly new GOP "gawd".
Gidney N Cloyd
(19,831 posts)elleng
(130,825 posts)The_Counsel
(1,660 posts)The President has the right to make recess appointments when the Senate isn't in session.
It's the reason why the Senate has ALWAYS been in session since Obama took office. Coincidence?
Gidney N Cloyd
(19,831 posts)...I assume Obama, because of all that stonewalling, was testing the whether the Senate was really in a state of being in session so it would get tossed to the SC. Buck sounds like Obama was caught pulling a fast one.
Zorro
(15,730 posts)Mossfern
(2,462 posts)Why didn't he bring that up
elleng
(130,825 posts)BumRushDaShow
(128,712 posts)Mersky
(4,980 posts)Was struck how were witnessing the effects of tyranny. Fearful republicans are willing to go along with anything. Theyre (willing) victims of tyranny. I almost feel sorry for some of them.
ancianita
(36,009 posts)Foreign governments are a worse threat today than in the Founders' day.
AND we've GOT the EVIDENCE of suborning that: the transcript, two fact witnesses testimony under oath, admission by both the president himself.
And the will of The People WILL prevail.
"America must remain the last, best hope on Earth."