Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NewsCenter28

(1,835 posts)
Wed Dec 4, 2019, 11:33 PM Dec 2019

Report: Source close to Speaker Pelosi can't see Impeachment Vote taking place this year

For those of you wondering on timing and, indeed, those speculating Springtime, you may have nailed it:

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/impeachment-trump-house-2020-timing

One source close to Pelosi was skeptical of moving impeachment this month.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

“I just don’t see it,” the Democratic source said about advancing impeachment before Christmas. “It’s too big.”


The breaks appear to be being applied. BTW, I just follow Chad on Twitter because he seems to have shown he knows the inner workings of House timings in and out. Please forgive the source. Chad appears to be one of the legit few journalists there.
16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Report: Source close to Speaker Pelosi can't see Impeachment Vote taking place this year (Original Post) NewsCenter28 Dec 2019 OP
Your link to Fox is unnerving folks California_Republic Dec 2019 #1
Remember Shep Smith NewsCenter28 Dec 2019 #3
Nice article free of normal Fox vitriol California_Republic Dec 2019 #4
You should see the rest of the site NewsCenter28 Dec 2019 #7
It's STILL FOX, people. Haggis for Breakfast Dec 2019 #15
Chris Wallace 's town hall with Mayor Pete was amazing fair California_Republic Dec 2019 #6
It is a tough risk/benefit analysis... but later is *probably* better. RockRaven Dec 2019 #2
And also we will NewsCenter28 Dec 2019 #5
GOOD! regnaD kciN Dec 2019 #8
and complain about the process elleng Dec 2019 #10
+1 crickets Dec 2019 #14
Wouldn't surprise me, considering the late date already; elleng Dec 2019 #9
So. The president may be impeached in the middle of an election year? Tiggeroshii Dec 2019 #11
Good....slow walk this sucker. nt OAITW r.2.0 Dec 2019 #12
As the vise closes, more shit will ooze out. More charges & scandals. Let the fruit ripen. n albacore Dec 2019 #13
cross reference repub senators up for reelection... katusha Dec 2019 #16

California_Republic

(1,826 posts)
1. Your link to Fox is unnerving folks
Wed Dec 4, 2019, 11:40 PM
Dec 2019

But your note: “Please forgive the source. Chad appears to be one of the legit few journalists there.”

Is helpful

NewsCenter28

(1,835 posts)
3. Remember Shep Smith
Wed Dec 4, 2019, 11:44 PM
Dec 2019

and Chris Wallace are legit journalists as well.

Also, worth nothing that there is nothing definitive on the schedule. So, it's confusing. Chad is helpful in this regard

NewsCenter28

(1,835 posts)
7. You should see the rest of the site
Wed Dec 4, 2019, 11:49 PM
Dec 2019

It really is more of a tabloid trash version of a RNC mailer lol. Disgusting but yeah for us parliamentary process nerds, Chad is and has been wonderful.

RockRaven

(14,898 posts)
2. It is a tough risk/benefit analysis... but later is *probably* better.
Wed Dec 4, 2019, 11:41 PM
Dec 2019

The GrOPers will go full McTurtle with a "We can't impeach someone in an election year!!!1!!!!1!!" argument, but they have also already telegraphed that their Senate trial strategy is going to be super-fast, super-shallow, get-it-over-with-asap-so-we-can-take-the-PR-hit-and-move-on.

In light of that, spilling out more and more evidence over months and pushing the Senate trial closer to the election period (and possibly after many primaries) *may* be beneficial.

It's a damned if you do, damned if you don't kind of thing. The "correct" answer is only available in hindsight and maybe not even then.

NewsCenter28

(1,835 posts)
5. And also we will
Wed Dec 4, 2019, 11:47 PM
Dec 2019

Have final court orders for the tax returns, the unredacted Mueller report, and ordered witness testimony by then if we do wait.

regnaD kciN

(26,044 posts)
8. GOOD!
Wed Dec 4, 2019, 11:54 PM
Dec 2019

This thing needs to be slow-walked to hell and back while we build a more-overwhelming case. At this point, rushing things only makes it easier for Repugs to quickly dismiss the charges.

elleng

(130,728 posts)
9. Wouldn't surprise me, considering the late date already;
Wed Dec 4, 2019, 11:55 PM
Dec 2019

lots more to do, including more testimony. (We should be so lucky.)

katusha

(809 posts)
16. cross reference repub senators up for reelection...
Thu Dec 5, 2019, 12:46 AM
Dec 2019

...with deadline to file a primary challenge in respective states.

Martha McSally az 4/6/20
Cory Gardner co 3/17/20
Johnny Isakson ga 3/6/20
David Perdue ga 3/6/20
Joni Ernst ia 3/13/20
Pat Roberts ks 6/1/20
Mitch McConnell tn 4/2/20
Susan Collins me 3/16/20
Cindy Hyde-Smith ms 1/10/20
Steve Daines mt 3/9/20
Thom Tillis nc 12/20/19
John Cornyn tx 12/9/19
Dan Sullivan ak 6/1/20
Tom Cotton ar 11/12/19
Jim Risch id 3/13/20
Bill Cassidy la 7/17/20
Ben Sasse ne 3/2/20
Jim Inhofe ok 4/10/20
Lindsey Graham sc 3/30/20
Mike Rounds sd 3/31/20
Lamar Alexander tn 4/2/20
Shelley Capito wv 1/25/20
Mike Enzi wy 5/29/20

by mid-april most will have passed, i would expect maximum impact for the trial to hit the senate somewhere between mid april and mid may. how will these senators vote without the fear of a primary from the right? will they appeal to base and acquit or try to sway independents and vote to remove? also how sweet would it be to ruin red dons convention with split screen trial in senate.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Report: Source close to ...