General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHow much would giving up meat help the environment?
IT IS NO secret that steaks and chops are delicious. But guzzling them incurs high costs for both carnivorous humans and the planet. Over half of adults in both America and Britain say they want to reduce their meat consumption, according to Mintel, a market-research firm. Whether they will is a different matter. The amount of meat that Americans and Britons consume per day has risen by 10% since 1970, according to figures from the UNs Food and Agriculture Organisation.
People who want to eat less livestockbut who cant quite bring themselves to exchange burgers for beansmight take inspiration from two recent academic papers. A study published this week by scientists at Oxford University and the University of Minnesota estimates both the medical and environmental burdens of having an extra serving per day of various food types. The health findings were sobering. Compared with a typical Western adult of the same age who eats an average diet, a person who guzzles an additional 50g of processed red meat (about two rashers of bacon) per day has a 41% higher chance of dying in a given year.
Meat has an even starker impact on the environment. Compared with a 100g portion of vegetablesthe standard serving size considered in academic papersa 50g chunk of red meat is associated with at least 20 times as much greenhouse-gas emitted and 100 times as much land use. Averaged across all the ecological indicators the authors used, red meat was about 35 times as damaging as a bowl of greens.
https://www.economist.com/graphic-detail/2019/11/15/how-much-would-giving-up-meat-help-the-environment?fsrc=scn/tw/te/bl/ed/howmuchwouldgivingupmeathelptheenvironmentdailychart
Response to demmiblue (Original post)
meow2u3 This message was self-deleted by its author.
OMG... there are just no words! Dog help us all when the right AND some on the left ignore the science.
Doodley
(9,048 posts)Doodley
(9,048 posts)Codeine
(25,586 posts)if it means they cant blithely continue to cram double handfuls of meat down their swollen gullets all day long. Muh Bacon trumps all.
Maraya1969
(22,464 posts)They opened a Whole Foods here and one of the workers said that they make sure their meat comes from good sources. Besides I always check to make sure the meat is grass fed from pastures and eggs from a humane source, (I read recently that just buying, "cage free" doesn't always help as some farmers will stuff so many chickens in a pen that they still can barely move. Humane eggs come from chickens who are brought outside and given a certain amount of space to live.
I haven't done chicken or pork yet because I don't cook that.
Doremus
(7,261 posts)Raising livestock is a very inefficient use of both food and energy. We could end most of the hunger in the world simply by feeding people the corn and other grains we feed to cattle every year.
Maraya1969
(22,464 posts)I talked about this movie called "the Magic pill" about the Keto diet. They talked about how many years ago there were millions of buffalo roaming around and methane was not a problem. It is the grains that they feed the livestock now that cause the methane problems. Also they showed how beef that is grass fed actually helps the environment because the grass grows faster once they eat just the top portion. This is a link to it.
https://blog.daveasprey.com/environmental-impact-grass-fed-meat/
Doremus
(7,261 posts)And it seems that even if the vegetation does sequester carbon, grass-fed beef is still an outsized source of greenhouse gasses.
To begin with, all cattle are a huge drain on the environment, no matter how you feed them. The report estimates that the livestock supply chain generates around 14.5 percent of global greenhouse gas emissions, and cattle create 65 percent of those livestock emissions. But even compared to cattle in general, grass-fed animals are heavy polluters. Within the global protein supply, grass-fed beef makes up around 1 gram of protein per person, per day, compared to 13 grams from all ruminants (cattle, sheep, goats, etc.). But these grazed cattle generate up to a third of all global greenhouse emissions from ruminants. In other words, grass-eating cattle create an outsized costemissions-wisecompared to the meat they provide.
And the carbon sequestration doesn't help enough to offset that. The report estimates that the carbon sequestration that might occur from grazing practices would only offset emissions by 20 percent.
Maraya1969
(22,464 posts)many years ago. Maybe the same number of cattle that are around today.
Doremus
(7,261 posts)And another 9 million are used for milk production.
Codeine
(25,586 posts)in the US alone, and 120 million pigs. And then all the animals on the rest of the planet, where there werent bison historically.
Herds of buffalo my ass. No fucking comparison.
Doodley
(9,048 posts)demosincebirth
(12,530 posts)Maraya1969
(22,464 posts)demosincebirth
(12,530 posts)Maraya1969
(22,464 posts)I'm sure that wasn't Union. I don't know about the other ones you mention. But I know Florida is terrible when it comes to paying employees. Actually $15/hour is considered good. The minimum wage is less than $9.
Codeine
(25,586 posts)can be called humane but all Im coming up with is mass self-delusion. The person selling you the flesh is going to tell you whatever you want to hear but the truth is far less savory.
pwb
(11,252 posts)I have cut back on all meats.
meow2u3
(24,759 posts)Especially for organic farming.
Maraya1969
(22,464 posts)around and how they were not a problem. The problem comes from feeding the cows grains. If you allow them to eat in a pasture the grass actually grows faster and.....somehow it is all better, (I'm not a damn scientist but I understood what they were saying when they were saying it)
I don't eat much meat either but when I do I try hard to make sure the animal lived a good life first.
Johnny2X2X
(18,973 posts)Grain friend cows are the problem. Grass fed beef is a totally different conversation.
Takket
(21,529 posts)We expend an INCREDIBLE amount of resources to raising cattle.
5) Cows are environmentally hazardous.
Cows both consume a lot of resources, and emit lots of dangerous greenhouse gases. In the US, 47% of land is dedicated to food production. Seventy percent of this land is used to grow feed for cattle. Conversely, 1% of that land is used to grow crops for humans.
Cows continuously emit methane, a greenhouse gas 23 times more potent than carbon, as they go about their days.
Source: https://www.globalcitizen.org/en/content/9-takeaways-from-leos-climate-change-doc/
Maraya1969
(22,464 posts)Doremus
(7,261 posts)But the jury is out on the benefits to the environment wherever they come from.
https://www.mentalfloss.com/article/504985/grass-fed-beef-actually-worse-planet-report-finds
roamer65
(36,744 posts)Australia has about 20-30 years left before it is agriculturally dead. Climate change is hitting the Southern Hemisphere harder first. With the Southern Hemisphere 2.5 million miles closer to the Sun during its summer is going make a larger difference as the climate changes.
Doremus
(7,261 posts)SterlingPound
(428 posts)Newest Reality
(12,712 posts)I also know a plant-based couple, (they prefer that label) who have had great benefits health-wise from a diet change. There is more and more medical evidence, (and doctors) showing a direct correlation between diet and chronic diseases to the point now that we are seeing there is nothing normal or natural or merely age-based about the prevalence of them. They are preventable for MOST people MOST of the time. There are other variables.
We learn a lot from what are called Blue Zones; certain places on the globe that have strikingly low incidences of chronic diseases, cancer, etc., and better longevity. It is a multivalent effect that includes diet, environment and behaviors. Anybody who has a chronic disease or who has been going down the ramp of heart disease where you go from intervention to intervention would be smart to do some serious looking into this because it can turn things around quickly.
Now, the reason I bring that up is that I am of the opinion that humans are ominvores, though I know there is debate about that. There are certain nutrients that we tend to obtain easily from a carnivore diet that are essential to health. If people, individually, or in in masses, are going to give up red meat, for instance, then there really has to be some solid, grounded knowledge about those nutrients and how to obtain them alternatively. We are talking about B-12, the kind of iron available, etc.
The reason I say that is that studies I have read have shown that there are most certainly huge benefits to health from a vegan diet, but there were also corresponding health problems associated with certain kinds of malnutrition. This can be rectified by using some knowledge and common sense.
So, while agreeing with the obvious impacts on the climate and a shift towards a sustainable, plant-based diet, we also have to have more nutrition information available during the transition or there can be negative effects.
safeinOhio
(32,641 posts)No factory pork, beef or chicken. I do eat lamb, goat and wild game. Range fed local.
PoindexterOglethorpe
(25,816 posts)that its supporters want you to think.
https://www.cnn.com/2017/02/06/health/vegetarian-diet-conversation/index.html
https://graziadaily.co.uk/life/real-life/science-says-vegetarian-worse-environment-eating-meat/
Plus, isn't it interesting that meat eaters don't go out of their way to persuade others they really ought to be eating meat, while the vegans and vegetarians let you know, usually within the first five minutes, that they are not eating meat.
Doodley
(9,048 posts)I have never once expressed a problem with that. What I do find is mockery from many that I choose not to eat meat. I am frequently told that I "don't know what I am missing," or that I should try the high-fat, meaty southern cooking my wife's family enjoy.
0rganism
(23,931 posts)"meat eaters don't go out of their way to persuade others they really ought to be eating meat"
to the extent it's true, it's because it's the fucking DEFAULT. y'all assume that everyone around you eats meat, so why talk about it? it's everywhere in the ambient culture too, especially commercials, a high percentage of which are for restaurants which specialize in hastily-prepared meat at heavily subsidized low low prices.
what's been really funny to see is how the carnivores are having conniptions now that vegetarian diets are becoming mainstream. what a bunch of bloody snowflakes the meat eaters turned out to be. maybe when you can't blindly believe everyone in your society is okay with eating meat, doing so gets a lot less fun.
"isn't it interesting?" yeah, cool story bro.
PoindexterOglethorpe
(25,816 posts)oblivious to all advertising.
And no, we're not snowflakes. If you're vegetarian and I accept a dinner invitation to your house, I am not going to demand you fix me meat. But if you accept a dinner to my house, I will try to have a few more veggies available than I might normally. Probably neither one of us is going to eat at the other's home.
0rganism
(23,931 posts)like i said earlier, it's in the ambient culture. it permeates the places we work, play, shop, and sell. it's in the holidays we celebrate.
meat and dairy consumption are generally assumed. when i go to dinner with friends or co-workers, i often hear (unprompted, by the way -- not like i'm talking up my diet) "you're not eating the meat? i could never do that, i have to eat meat!" and it's not just me, my wife and other vegans share similar experiences. we don't invite carnivores over to our house for meals anymore, since they'll likely be disappointed (where's the beef? what, you don't eat meat? not even cheese?!?). we avoid going to other peoples' homes for meals, since it really is too much to suppose there will be a vegan option and we don't want to cause undue concern to the host/ess.
so yeah, we probably won't eat at the other's home, and that's okay. peace out and happy holidays to you and yours.
flibbitygiblets
(7,220 posts)Oprah might disagree with that https://www.texastribune.org/2018/01/10/time-oprah-winfrey-beefed-texas-cattle-industry/
Winfreys Texas beef began in April 1996, when her talk show aired an episode on food safety. A segment included discussion of bovine spongiform encephalopathy, commonly known as mad cow disease, which had recently killed cattle in England. Howard Lyman, a vegetarian and animal rights activist, predicted on the show that the disease would eventually plague the U.S. beef industry. Winfrey declared that the discussion has just stopped me cold from eating another burger. I'm stopped."
That public statement earned Winfrey a $10M lawsuit from Big Beef (she prevailed).
Thirteen states (all red with the possible exception of CO) have "veggie libel laws" that prohibit people from saying anything negative about the meat industry. Critics believe these laws are actually meant to shut up whistleblowers and keep people ill-informed of the dangers of eating so much livestock.
True_Blue
(3,063 posts)I can't begin to tell you how many times I've been lectured about how not eating meat is bad for my health. I like seafood, dairy & eggs, etc... everything except meat. I'm a lacto-pescatarian, but meat eaters always assume that I must be a vegan or vegetarian just because I don't eat meat.
PoindexterOglethorpe
(25,816 posts)And I'm sorry that anyone ever does that to you, or to anyone who chooses not to eat meat, because at a minimum it's rude.
Greybnk48
(10,162 posts)Pigs, beef cattle and many other animals who would lose their value if not sold for meat would be eradicated and the grazing and farmland would open to development for what? Condos? Water Parks? Subdivisions? Other ugly things.
British Philosopher Richard Hare, Peter Singer's mentor, has argued that animal lovers should practice demi-vegitarianism for the sake of the animals themselves. Not vegetarianism or veganism. Eat meat as a side, a few days a week, to save the animals from losing their value.
I've leaned this way for about 25 years after I met this Philosopher and heard him talk.
Doodley
(9,048 posts)of millions of animal lives each week.
sarisataka
(18,500 posts)To this new abundance of animals?
Doodley
(9,048 posts)sarisataka
(18,500 posts)Last edited Thu Dec 5, 2019, 10:40 PM - Edit history (1)
Would be eradicated but there would be mass euthanasia. Logically it is the only thing that makes sense.
Doodley
(9,048 posts)sarisataka
(18,500 posts)would not "save" any animals. Small populations would still be raised for other products derived from animals and the rest would be eliminated.
Doodley
(9,048 posts)What part of "saving" animals don't you get?
Greybnk48
(10,162 posts)to sell? They would be "allowed" to go extinct at the very least if profit cannot be made from keeping them. So "saving" the animals, like pigs, would then be allowing the species to go extinct rather than eating them?
For some animal lovers, and philosophers like Hare and others, that argument seems disingenuous.
I believe that the treatment of animals that are raised for mass consumption is horrific and cruel to the point of being evil in some cases. But I also believe that we can do much to end this type of coarse and callous treatment of animals without forcing everyone to go vegetarian. Joel Salatin is someone who has worked diligently to educate people about how it can be done. There are others as well. And it's much healthier food than what we have now.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joel_Salatin
dware
(12,264 posts)it's my choice to be a meat eater, I will continue to eat meat.
I'm 72 yo and in perfect health, been eating meat all my life, doesn't seem to have affected my health.
Doremus
(7,261 posts)pintobean
(18,101 posts)Doremus
(7,261 posts)customerserviceguy
(25,183 posts)makes you feel holy, then go for it.
But I'm not giving up my steak because of your misguided beliefs.
dware
(12,264 posts)hunter
(38,304 posts)demmiblue
(36,824 posts)What a strange response. I guess science isnt your strong suit.
customerserviceguy
(25,183 posts)being played. "If you don't agree with me, you are being unscientific."
Doremus
(7,261 posts)yewberry
(6,530 posts)Can you try?
Seems that you show up in every thread about this topic and say shitty things about people for no reason other than the fact that you get away with it.
customerserviceguy
(25,183 posts)is the safe space provided here for people who want to believe that everyone who disagrees with them is heinously wrong. A few months ago, they couldn't handle my remarks about how they proselytize their beliefs, and that's the reason they get the reactions that they do. So, they banned me from there, everywhere else is where I get to stand up for myself and my fellow omnivores.
flvegan
(64,406 posts)And it's not "they" it's me, snowflake.
yewberry
(6,530 posts)Just because it's allowed doesn't make it true or right. As I said before preachy judgmental jerks exist at the far end of every spectra-- that doesn't make them vegan or omnivore, that just makes them preachy judgmental jerks.
Your opinion is that we accuse you of being "heinously wrong" and proselytize, but I've never done either of those things. I don't think I'm "holy" and I don't "worship" animals in some weird religious fashion. You have opined about how you believe we are somehow plotting to take meat away from you. You're the outlier with bizarre beliefs, not us.
And you were banned from VVAR because you were insulting us in a closed forum, not because we can't "handle" your remarks.
Codeine
(25,586 posts)are heinously wrong if for no other reason than my wife and kids eat meat.
And the notion that someone needs to stand up for meat eaters is quite similar to the notion that people need to defend white people from racism the overwhelmingly vast majority of humans are meat eaters, nobody needs to defend them. Theyre doing just fine.
And you got banned because thats how groups work, not because somebody couldnt handle your special truths.
MrsCoffee
(5,801 posts)Its entirely possible that without an early diet that included generous amounts of animal protein, we wouldnt even have become humanat least not the modern, verbal, intelligent humans we are.
Not sure if that means anything going forward or not, but there's that.
Doodley
(9,048 posts)brooklynite
(94,373 posts)I think some vegans imagine that farm animals would return to a wild existence that they haven't lived in thousands of years.
demmiblue
(36,824 posts)Doremus
(7,261 posts)Carnivores who worry about :
1) the well-being of animals that aren't going to slaughter
2) that there might be millions of animals left over when the "vegan light switch" is pushed
brooklynite
(94,373 posts)MLAA
(17,252 posts)If you have Netflix or iTunes check out The Game Changers. Great movie about professional athletes improving their performance on plant based diet. Runners, football players, mixed martial art champion, Olympic athletes and more. Also discusses sexual performance improvement and heart disease reversal and prevention.
Very entertaining movie, doesnt feel like a documentary.
Johnny2X2X
(18,973 posts)Some good info in it for sure, but its been exposed as stretching the truth and being very selective with data.
Doremus
(7,261 posts)MLAA
(17,252 posts)democratisphere
(17,235 posts)Better for the animal populations.
Kali
(55,004 posts)nor the incredible BENEFITS large grazing animals can provide to the environment. the way animals are raised and fed affects the nutrition of the meat, as well.
The_jackalope
(1,660 posts)We recommend four widely applicable high-impact (i.e. low emissions) actions with the potential to contribute to systemic change and substantially reduce annual personal emissions:
* having one fewer child (an average for developed countries of 58.6?tonnes CO2-equivalent (tCO2e) emission reductions per year),
*living car-free (2.4 tCO2e saved per year),
*avoiding airplane travel (1.6 tCO2e saved per roundtrip transatlantic flight) and
*eating a plant-based diet (0.8 tCO2e saved per year)
Having one less child has the same impact as 73 people switching from being meat-eating omnivores to vegetarian.
There are many ways to reduce your impact on the planet. Do as many of tghem as you can, but for the planet's sake, STOP HAVING CHILDREN!
roamer65
(36,744 posts)Do you want to be well off like your uncle? Dont have children.
3 steps for effective population reduction.
1st step...remove all government incentives for having children.
2nd step...free birth control and abortions on demand.
3rd step...cash payments for vasectomies, birth control implants and abortions.
gulliver
(13,168 posts)If we want to continue doing nothing about climate change on a global scale, there is no better way to ensure that than to tell people they have to trade meat for a stable climate. We are much, much better off talking about clean energy, carbon capture, and the growing yumminess of meat alternatives.
Time is on the side of the vegetarian. If we manage to save the planet from the Republicanists, people will end up eating vegetables and meat substitutes more and more imo. But we can't save the planet by acting like we want to take away people's favorite foods. That's just asking for them to ignore us and the truth of climate change in the bargain.
The_jackalope
(1,660 posts)They may taste a little bitter though.
I agree wholeheartedly with your observation that telling people they have to give up things they enjoy (like driving cars, eating meat or having children) is not going to promote behaviour change.
JustABozoOnThisBus
(23,325 posts)Cannibal 1: Man, I really, really hate John Bolton!
Cannibal 2: Ok, then, just eat the noodles.
Bayard
(22,011 posts)Nothing like a bad case of food poisoning to make you not want to eat meat, or much of anything else!
I think its interesting that Burger King is trying out vege burgers, with people in the ads exclaiming they taste just like a Whopper. Corporate America, testing the waters.
dware
(12,264 posts)just to test Burger King's claim, I tried one of their Impossible Whoppers, to me, it didn't taste anything like a normal Whopper, it left a bad after taste in my mouth.
I'll never again try one. it's real meat for me.
Now I don't have to try one.
ProfessorGAC
(64,875 posts)I eat them and find them a perfectly tasty burger.
You sure the aftertaste wasn't created by a preconception?
dware
(12,264 posts)Hey, different strokes for different folks.
I'm not telling anyone to not eat them, I just don't think they taste anything like real meat.
xmas74
(29,671 posts)It wasn't too bad, though I bet it would need to be freshly cooked with no time under a heat lamp. A friend tried a bite, not knowing what it was and liked it. He said he'd consider doing a Meatless Monday if he could find more alternatives like it.
dware
(12,264 posts)maybe I've been eating meat for so long my taste buds can tell the difference between meat and plant based food, IDK, but, hey, if one likes it, then by all means, enjoy it.
Far be it from me to tell anyone not to eat what they prefer.
Codeine
(25,586 posts)and I thought the Impossible Whopper really sucked.
The Beyond Tacos at Taco Bell were very tasty, however, and the Beyond burgers I make at home are fantastic. They do smell a bit strange, tbh.
dware
(12,264 posts)Several truck stops have a Taco Bell on their premises, I'll definitely try one.
Thanks for that information.
Unfortunately, being a long haul truck driver limits my culinary choices, but I do try to eat healthy when it's possible, especially when I'm on R&R from the road.
scheming daemons
(25,487 posts)MineralMan
(146,262 posts)I suspect that a lot of people aren't consuming steak at the same level they used to. Our diets are changing.
dware
(12,264 posts)it's hard for me to eat as healthy as I would like, truck stops aren't known for healthy eating, but, I do have a refrigerator and hot plate in my sleeper, so I do try to stock up on healthy food before I hit the road.
evertonfc
(1,713 posts)but not for moral reasons. I just decided to try it 6 months ago. I could never go vegan. I adore real cheese, yogurts, milk products, ect.
Doremus
(7,261 posts)evertonfc
(1,713 posts)eat avoid meat. Vegans avoid anything that comes from animals. Vegetarians eat eggs, cheese, ect. I get your point
It was your reference to plant based that threw me. It's all good.
MFM008
(19,803 posts)Red meat.
Unfortunately i tried veganism but im to poor to afford it.
Seriously.
flvegan
(64,406 posts)"Progressives" go figure, right? LOL. Something about bacon and being an idiot.
Codeine
(25,586 posts)but then turn right around and do the same damned thing because Evul Vegans Gonna Take Muh Whopper!!
Response to demmiblue (Original post)
Freelancer This message was self-deleted by its author.
hunter
(38,304 posts)https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Invasive_earthworms_of_North_America
Aussie105
(5,334 posts)Does it taste like meat? Probably not, haven't had a cow based hamburger for years.
Doesn't matter, as long as it tastes nice.
Except for an overpowering smoky flavour that lingered, it was ok.
I have been looking for meat replacement 'hamburger' patties in supermarkets, not much there and the prices are astronomical.
Keep trying people, make it tasty - not meat like - and cheap.
Wife and I have gone partly vegetarian, still use milk, yoghurt and cheese. But the bulk purchase of dead cow stopped decades ago.
Don't miss it.
Experimenting with salads, local shop sells mixed leaf, add some parmesan cheese and dressing, makes a cheap and filling meal.
DFW
(54,302 posts)First it was uric acid build-up, and then it was cholesterol issues. I'll occasionally try a bite of someone else's meat if we're at a restaurant, but consume nowhere near a pound of beef a year. I once had half a bison burger, which is supposedly low in cholesterol, but wasn't impressed. We made the transition to fish, poultry and vegetables rather easily.
Nature Man
(869 posts)the presumption of eternity in the comma space of natural life.
The presumption that we actually matter in the whole scheme of things: our species needs to understand its place in the universe.
None of this shit actually matters.
GulfCoast66
(11,949 posts)Obviously, thats not what is being proposed here. But there are things we can do from a policy standpoint that improve the situation. Use tax policy to encourage the eating of farm animals that are consume near where they are raised. Although that is becoming more popular everywhere. We can actually get grass fed Florida beef here now which was unheard of 10 years ago. Ruminates evolved on this planet and we evolved eating them. Trying to change that is pissing into the wind. We are hard-wired to eat meat.
Actually, recent research strongly suggests that had our ancient pre-human ancestors not begun to eat meat we would have not had enough calories in our diet for our massive, energy consuming brain to evolve.
Personally I eat a good amount of venison I kill myself, so except for the 600 miles I drive to shoot the deer I am not eating industrial meat. Plus lots of fish I catch in the gulf. But of course, that involves pulling a boat with an internal combustion engine 60 miles using a truck with and 8 cylinder engine.
Rather than tilting at the windmill of trying to eliminate meat consumption I think we should long term focus on policy that encourages better livestock distribution. Most meat eaten in Florida is shipped from Midwest feedlots. The irony is that Florida raises huge numbers of calves which are shipped to the Midwest to be fed out. Then slaughtered and shipped back. Crazy!
roamer65
(36,744 posts)Response to demmiblue (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
whistler162
(11,155 posts)samnsara
(17,606 posts)Farmer-Rick
(10,140 posts)Each person is different. And some foods work for some people. We don't all have to eat the same way. In fact what is good for one person can be deadly for another. I know there are vegan low carb eaters but each time I've tried that, my glucose levels start going up, especially when soy is substituted for protein.
I went vagan for 2 years and my weight sky rocketed. I was pre-diabetic and feeling really crappy. Seems I am very sensitive (or not so sensitive actually) to carbohydrates in fruits and vegetables. They spike my glucose levels very rapidly and very high. As long as I'm not eating much in the way of grains, starchy vegis and fruits, I can keep it under control.
But the only way I have found to control it is to eat a lot of meat. Not everyone can tolerate a vegan life style.
That said, humane, natural animal husbandry is a no brainer. It is the only way to address the carbon issues to some extent and keep pastures from turning into deserts.
Pastures use to be pleasant areas for picnicking. Not any more. People over graze as a standard method. They especially over graze cattle. Sheep, free range hog and chicken and even rabbit are better on the environment and better for the pasture. Reducing the amount of pasture raised cattle is a good idea. But some of us can not go vegan.
dware
(12,264 posts)JCMach1
(27,553 posts)energy for electricity, vehicles, and industry.