General Discussion

brooklynite

(94,493 posts) Tue Dec 17, 2019, 06:04 PM Dec 2019

BREAKING: Jared Golden (ME-2) will vote FOR Article 1 but AGAINST Article 2

Link to tweet

17 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

BREAKING: Jared Golden (ME-2) will vote FOR Article 1 but AGAINST Article 2 (Original Post) brooklynite Dec 2019 OP

Way to split the baby. There is overwhelming evidence of both. mahina Dec 2019 #1

And thereby piss off everyone! jcgoldie Dec 2019 #2

My God, he obstructed live on TV for everyone to see. dewsgirl Dec 2019 #3

I do not understand how anyone can vote against article 2 mainstreetonce Dec 2019 #4

"republicans will love me if I only vote for one" lol nt msongs Dec 2019 #5

Trying to find a Susan Collins groove, is he? rzemanfl Dec 2019 #6

Well, at least he replaced a Republican. eShirl Dec 2019 #14

Maine must be a place of weak opinions. n/t rzemanfl Dec 2019 #16

That's just... embarrassing. Mike 03 Dec 2019 #7

Good Go'in Golden ritapria Dec 2019 #8

high likelyhoo evertonfc Dec 2019 #9

I don't care evertonfc Dec 2019 #10

I don't see how anyone can vote no on the second. Vinca Dec 2019 #11

This is what bad political consultancy looks like Yavin4 Dec 2019 #12

Yep, fretting about the polls instead of doing the hard work to change the polls liskddksil Dec 2019 #15

Soooo, let me see if I have this right StarfishSaver Dec 2019 #13

what the hell is his rationalization for that? choie Dec 2019 #17

mahina

(17,641 posts)

1. Way to split the baby. There is overwhelming evidence of both.

Reply to brooklynite (Original post)

Tue Dec 17, 2019, 06:05 PM

Dec 2019

jcgoldie

(11,631 posts)

2. And thereby piss off everyone!

Reply to brooklynite (Original post)

Tue Dec 17, 2019, 06:07 PM

Dec 2019

dewsgirl

(14,961 posts)

3. My God, he obstructed live on TV for everyone to see.

Reply to brooklynite (Original post)

Tue Dec 17, 2019, 06:07 PM

Dec 2019

mainstreetonce

(4,178 posts)

4. I do not understand how anyone can vote against article 2

Reply to brooklynite (Original post)

Tue Dec 17, 2019, 06:10 PM

Dec 2019

I thought some Reps might go for that one.

msongs

(67,394 posts)

5. "republicans will love me if I only vote for one" lol nt

Reply to brooklynite (Original post)

Tue Dec 17, 2019, 06:11 PM

Dec 2019

rzemanfl

(29,556 posts)

6. Trying to find a Susan Collins groove, is he?

Reply to brooklynite (Original post)

Tue Dec 17, 2019, 06:11 PM

Dec 2019

Glad I am not shopping for jewelry for Xmas because Jared is now even more of a repugnant name.

eShirl

(18,490 posts)

14. Well, at least he replaced a Republican.

Reply to rzemanfl (Reply #6)

Tue Dec 17, 2019, 06:52 PM

Dec 2019

rzemanfl

(29,556 posts)

16. Maine must be a place of weak opinions. n/t

Reply to eShirl (Reply #14)

Tue Dec 17, 2019, 07:02 PM

Dec 2019

Mike 03

(16,616 posts)

7. That's just... embarrassing.

Reply to brooklynite (Original post)

Tue Dec 17, 2019, 06:11 PM

Dec 2019

It's just so he can play semantic games with respect to where he stood on impeachment. I hope he doesn't die of embarrassment before tomorrow's vote.

ritapria

(1,812 posts)

8. Good Go'in Golden

Reply to brooklynite (Original post)

Tue Dec 17, 2019, 06:12 PM

Dec 2019

He must believe the voters in his district are as dumb as a box of rocks ………...

evertonfc

(1,713 posts)

9. high likelyhoo

Reply to ritapria (Reply #8)

Tue Dec 17, 2019, 06:16 PM

Dec 2019

they are

evertonfc

(1,713 posts)

10. I don't care

Reply to brooklynite (Original post)

Tue Dec 17, 2019, 06:18 PM

Dec 2019

Let them do what they think is best. It's not going to change the fact that Trump will be Impeached and acquitted

Vinca

(50,260 posts)

11. I don't see how anyone can vote no on the second.

Reply to brooklynite (Original post)

Tue Dec 17, 2019, 06:36 PM

Dec 2019

If Trump obstructed any more he'd have the lights turned off in the House.

Yavin4

(35,433 posts)

12. This is what bad political consultancy looks like

Reply to brooklynite (Original post)

Tue Dec 17, 2019, 06:39 PM

Dec 2019

He was probably told to do this by some hack pollster/consultant.

The negative ad against him writes itself.

liskddksil

(2,753 posts)

15. Yep, fretting about the polls instead of doing the hard work to change the polls

Reply to Yavin4 (Reply #12)

Tue Dec 17, 2019, 06:53 PM

Dec 2019

by doing the right thing and then explaining why persuasively and agressively. This is why our Party has been such an abject failure in recent years.

StarfishSaver

(18,486 posts)

13. Soooo, let me see if I have this right

Reply to brooklynite (Original post)

Tue Dec 17, 2019, 06:44 PM

Dec 2019

Abuse of power is an impeachable offense. but Congress doesn't have any right to investigate it?

choie

(4,111 posts)

17. what the hell is his rationalization for that?

Reply to brooklynite (Original post)

Tue Dec 17, 2019, 07:44 PM

Dec 2019

n/t

Reply to this discussion