HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » No evidence?

Wed Dec 18, 2019, 03:14 PM

No evidence?

Just keep it up. So by repeating that time after time will not make that lie true.

Then he said that Trump wanted to get to the bottom of what happened in 2016 in the Ukraine.
Straight up Russian talking point.

Chairman Nadler There is a vast preponderance of evidence.

9 replies, 774 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread

Response to Botany (Original post)

Wed Dec 18, 2019, 03:33 PM

1. I would like to take that further and suggest that the evidence is clear and convincing, if not

beyond a reasonable doubt.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to alwaysinasnit (Reply #1)

Wed Dec 18, 2019, 03:47 PM

2. But "they" had Ivy League-rs giving testimony aka smart people can't be trusted

... talking to the Fox News base.

Although Trump has tens of tons of more shit on him Nancy P, Schiff, Nadler, and others ...
had it narrowed down to the 2 charges, abuse of power and obstruction from which they
could make an open and shut case from

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Botany (Original post)

Wed Dec 18, 2019, 03:48 PM

3. Gotta work "clock and calendar" in there somewhere.

Sound bites for fox don’t cha know?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Arthur_Frain (Reply #3)

Wed Dec 18, 2019, 03:51 PM

5. Don't forget "the will of the 63 million Trump voters"

nicely skipping over the 66 million HRC voters and the 16 million who were removed
before the 2016 election.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Botany (Reply #5)

Wed Dec 18, 2019, 03:55 PM

7. That's right!

But if you could somehow work the electoral college landslide into the same statement, you’d be approaching a critical mass of hypocrisy.

Might want to clear the room of non rethugs before we try that. Who knows what would happen?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Botany (Original post)

Wed Dec 18, 2019, 03:50 PM

4. "Trump wanted to get to the bottom of what happened in 2016 in the Ukraine."

Why not take the findings of your Intelligence Communities, Donald?

They ALL told you it was Russian meddling and nothing to do with Ukraine....

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Sogo (Reply #4)

Wed Dec 18, 2019, 03:54 PM

6. You can't be pro Trump and pro American @ the same time.

BTW all 17 US Intel Agencies were lying too.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Botany (Reply #6)

Wed Dec 18, 2019, 04:00 PM

8. Sounds like a good bumper sticker:

You can't be pro Trump and pro American @ the same time.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Sogo (Reply #8)

Wed Dec 18, 2019, 04:06 PM

9. Please do so

Or pass it around "the internets"

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread