General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTrump high-fives Fox News for advocating Senate dismissal of impeachment on 51 procedural votes
@realDonaldTrump
Its my opinion as a lawyer that the Articles of Impeachment are defective on their face, which means I would like to see a Motion to Dismiss and have this disbursed without the necessity of a trial. I dont think there should be a trial. I think it should be dismissed....
2:41 PM · Dec 31, 2019·Twitter for iPhone
Link to tweet
Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump...on 51 votes, which is procedural. You dont need two thirds. Brad Blakeman @FoxNews A great lawyer & person. Thank you Brad!
2:41 PM · Dec 31, 2019·Twitter for iPhone
Link to tweet
doc03
(35,325 posts)regnaD kciN
(26,044 posts)...until Republicans start getting serious.
underpants
(182,763 posts)Who?
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,669 posts)underpants
(182,763 posts)Happy New Year
Baitball Blogger
(46,699 posts)The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,669 posts)If somebody is stupid enough to take a TV lawyer's advice, especially that of a Trump toady on Fox, they deserve what they get.
onenote
(42,690 posts)And he's not a Constitutional lawyer.
He graduated from a bottom feeding law school, Touro, which US News ranks in its 146-192 category (meaning that there are anywhere from 145 to 191 schools ranked higher).
He is an "adjunct" professor at Georgetown, but has no publications listed in his bio and the list of courses he has taught do not include any in constitutional law.
He labels himself "Hon" even though his position in the Bush White House was, and I'm not making this up, "Deputy Assistant to the President for Appointments and Scheduling, Vetting and Research, Correspondence and Surrogate Scheduling."
His assertion that the Articles are "defective on their face" is itself a statement that is, on its face, clearly wrong since there is no definition of the term "high crimes and misdemeanors" and previous impeachment proceedings have been based on obstruction of Congress and abuse of office.
The only conclusion I can reach is that Blakeman is such a bad lawyer that he doesn't even understand the commonly used legal phrase "on their face."
COLGATE4
(14,732 posts)the Fux-imbibing knuckle draggers from cheering this latest nonsense on as vindicating their hero.