General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhen I read an article like this I most always
"google" the author and the findings are usually what I expect, a rightwing mouth piece and former writer for rightwing rags,which is correct in this case and.... well just pretty much what the WP has become.
Introducing President MSNBC
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/kathleen-parker-liberals-love-affair-with-msnbc/2012/09/07/f7b37932-f917-11e1-8b93-c4f4ab1c8d13_story.html?hpid=z3
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,661 posts)All you need is the name; no point in reading any farther.
I think it's amusing that she bashes MSNBC's talking heads for their "liberal bias." Yes - Bashir, Maddow, Matthews, Sharpton, Schultz and O'Donnell are liberal and they don't attempt to pretend otherwise. They are editorialists. Their job is to offer opinion.
But what of FOX News? Not a word about its blatant conservative bias, and its ongoing electronic fellatio of Romney and Ryan. And the huge difference between FOX and the MSNBC commentators is that FOX claims it is just offering unbiased news. Hannity, O'Reilly, the indistinguishable blondes, etc., all pretend to be be newspeople, like, say, Cronkite, offering "fair and balanced" news.
Parker seems to have missed that difference, but then, she would.
yellerpup
(12,253 posts)So the link will work.
Tennessee Gal
(6,160 posts)BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)This rightwing corporate shill, as many others, has been unleashed to write as negatively about MSNBC as possible since the cable news network's ratings crushed those of Fox"News"Channel this week.
http://tv.yahoo.com/news/msnbc-beats-fnc-cnn-dnc-day-one-coverage-193615932.html
Watch for more of this tripe by so-called unbiased journalists.