Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

morningfog

(18,115 posts)
Sun Sep 9, 2012, 12:51 AM Sep 2012

Holding the US to account for civilian drone deaths in Yemen

When news flashed of an airstrike on two cars in the city of Radaa on Sunday afternoon, early claims that ‘al Qaeda militants’ had died soon gave way to a more grisly reality. At least 11 civilians had been killed, among them women and three children. It was the worst loss of civilian life in Yemen’s brutal internal war since May 2012. Somebody had messed up badly. But who was responsible – the United States or Yemen?

Local officials and eyewitnesses were clear enough. The Radaa attack was the work of a US drone, a common enough event since the start of the Arab Spring. From May 2011, the Bureau of Investigative Journalism has recorded up to 116 US drone strikes in Yemen, part of a broader covert war aimed at crushing Islamist militants. But of those attacks, only 39 have been confirmed by officials as the work of the United States.

The attribution of dozens of further possible drone attacks – and others reportedly involving US ships and conventional aircraft – remain unclear. Both the CIA and Pentagon are fighting dirty wars in Yemen, each with a separate arsenal and kill list. Little wonder that hundreds of deaths – among them up to 57 civilians – remain in a limbo of accountability.

‘Decrepit’ air force
With anger rising at the death of civilians in Radaa, Yemen’s government stepped forward to take the blame. It claimed that its own air force had carried out the strike on moving vehicles after ‘faulty intelligence.’ Yet the Yemen Air Force is barely fit for purpose, its decrepit fleet of mainly Soviet-era aircraft incapable of precision bombing.

http://www.thebureauinvestigates.com/2012/09/07/holding-the-us-to-account-for-civilian-drone-deaths-in-yemen/

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Holding the US to account for civilian drone deaths in Yemen (Original Post) morningfog Sep 2012 OP
Not sure what you're are getting at former-republican Sep 2012 #1
It is sad when civilians are killed and we as the killer don't even acknowledge them. morningfog Sep 2012 #2
agree it is sad former-republican Sep 2012 #3
The President doesn't authorize each and every strike. morningfog Sep 2012 #4
Of course it's not each and every former-republican Sep 2012 #5
That is not accurate. morningfog Sep 2012 #7
I think I didn't make my self clear former-republican Sep 2012 #10
As to the legal justifications former-republican Sep 2012 #6
You say "many times" but you don't know. morningfog Sep 2012 #8
You're right I don't know but former-republican Sep 2012 #9
 

former-republican

(2,163 posts)
1. Not sure what you're are getting at
Sun Sep 9, 2012, 01:02 AM
Sep 2012

You want President Obama charged for a crime?
I apologize in advance If I'm misinterpreting the intention of your post.

 

morningfog

(18,115 posts)
2. It is sad when civilians are killed and we as the killer don't even acknowledge them.
Sun Sep 9, 2012, 01:05 AM
Sep 2012

Accountability would mean we take responsibility for our actions and our mistakes. Especially when it results in killing civilians. Oversight and public discussion and debate would be a start.

 

former-republican

(2,163 posts)
3. agree it is sad
Sun Sep 9, 2012, 01:10 AM
Sep 2012

but when the President authorizes a strike like this ( if he did )
Every precaution is usually taken to minimize collateral damage.

Sometimes sadly it happens.

 

morningfog

(18,115 posts)
4. The President doesn't authorize each and every strike.
Sun Sep 9, 2012, 01:15 AM
Sep 2012

It depends on whether it is a strike targeting a specific individual or a particular behavior. The real problem is that the strikes, the orders and the standards are not debated in public. No one know what precautions are actually taken, because there is no actual discussion of the strikes.

The Obama Administration has refused and stonewalled on releasing their legal justifications on targeted strikes. We don't know what their rationale or precautions are.

 

former-republican

(2,163 posts)
5. Of course it's not each and every
Sun Sep 9, 2012, 01:22 AM
Sep 2012

drone strike but in Yemen it would need Presidential approval.
Just as it did when our drones started targeting the taliban in Pakistan.

 

morningfog

(18,115 posts)
7. That is not accurate.
Sun Sep 9, 2012, 08:55 AM
Sep 2012

If it a target of an individual, the President has to sign off. If it is a signature strike, he doesn't have to.

And no, giving the legal justification would not divulge dangerous information. We just need to know the basis and have some form of oversight.

 

former-republican

(2,163 posts)
10. I think I didn't make my self clear
Sun Sep 9, 2012, 07:11 PM
Sep 2012

To begin drone strikes in Yemen it had to be to be authorized by the President before the very first one occurred.

Whether it was a strike to target an individual or a signature strike.

 

former-republican

(2,163 posts)
6. As to the legal justifications
Sun Sep 9, 2012, 01:34 AM
Sep 2012

That's a tough one because you are asking the President to release evidence on we knew the targets were involved
in terrorism.

Many times it's through informants , C.I.A classified documents.

 

morningfog

(18,115 posts)
8. You say "many times" but you don't know.
Sun Sep 9, 2012, 08:57 AM
Sep 2012

In fact, the majority of the strikes target individuals who the CIA doesn't know and never even identify.

 

former-republican

(2,163 posts)
9. You're right I don't know but
Sun Sep 9, 2012, 07:07 PM
Sep 2012

I'm pretty sure it's not random strikes. The people targeted are through our intelligence or Yemen's and ours combined.

It's much easier for Yemen's intelligence to get undercover informants that can infiltrate the terror network there.
As to them being identified , probably some are low level terrorists in the network. Some are foreign fighters that have joined there same as some of the taliban killed in Afghanistan and Pakistan . We don't identify them either. For lack of a better term they are foot soldiers.

I hope you're not getting the wrong idea that I am defending the collateral damage
and civilian deaths that are occurring.

It's that I can understand it when it happens .

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Holding the US to account...