Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

xchrom

(108,903 posts)
Sun Sep 9, 2012, 06:28 AM Sep 2012

How Reforming Welfare and Gutting Programs for the Poor Became a Bipartisan Platform

http://www.alternet.org/labor/how-reforming-welfare-and-gutting-programs-poor-became-bipartisan-platform



The Romney camp's new attack line on the Obama administration--that he “gutted” the work requirements imposed on families receiving public assistance--has been widely debunked as a distortion of a mundane policy memo. But the real scandal here isn’t what Obama did or didn’t do to “workfare”; it’s that both parties have gutted the welfare system as a whole to conduct a cruel social experiment on impoverished families.

As many watchdogs have pointed out, the memo in question from the Department of Health and Human Services basically offers states more flexibility to meet mandatory targets for moving people off of Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) and into gainful employment. This program, administered jointly through federal and state agencies, is the central plank of Clinton-era welfare reform , and its principal political aim has always been to reduce the statistical presence of the poor, not alleviating their poverty.

According to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP), as welfare reform approaches its Sweet Sixteen, TANF's track record contrasts bitterly with that of its predecessor, AFDC, which Reaganite conservatives had savaged as undeserved entitlement:

'Over the last 16 years, the national TANF caseload has declined by 60 percent, even as poverty and deep poverty have worsened. While the official poverty rate among families declined in the early years of welfare reform, when the economy was booming and unemployment was extremely low, it started increasing in 2000 and now exceeds its 1996 level.

These opposing trends — TANF caseloads going down while poverty is going up — mean that a much smaller share of poor families receive cash assistance from TANF than they did prior to welfare reform.'

This punitive approach to poverty has driven poor mothers of color further to the margins of the economy, making them even more politically invisible.
17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How Reforming Welfare and Gutting Programs for the Poor Became a Bipartisan Platform (Original Post) xchrom Sep 2012 OP
kr HiPointDem Sep 2012 #1
unfortunately much of the sales pitch of today's Democratic Party goes something like "we bash the Douglas Carpenter Sep 2012 #2
It needs to be said again and again nxylas Sep 2012 #4
The DLC is just as much a Koch Brothers creation as the Tea Party. Vincardog Sep 2012 #15
Say goodnight, Gracie nxylas Sep 2012 #16
'reduce the statistical presence of the poor, not alleviating their poverty.' KG Sep 2012 #3
can anyone imagine a campaign ad like this running in swing states today? Douglas Carpenter Sep 2012 #5
i remember that ad. xchrom Sep 2012 #6
Spam deleted by Violet_Crumble (MIR Team) PONTING12 Sep 2012 #7
link from the article...3 in 4 recipients who find jobs lose them within 6 months dkf Sep 2012 #8
Been that way for as long as I can remember dixiegrrrrl Sep 2012 #13
recalling a different era Douglas Carpenter Sep 2012 #9
... xchrom Sep 2012 #10
How do you like your "Freedom" now? Dustlawyer Sep 2012 #11
K&R (n/t) a2liberal Sep 2012 #12
"The poor have shitty lobbyists." John Stewart Heather MC Sep 2012 #14
k/r nt limpyhobbler Sep 2012 #17

Douglas Carpenter

(20,226 posts)
2. unfortunately much of the sales pitch of today's Democratic Party goes something like "we bash the
Sun Sep 9, 2012, 06:44 AM
Sep 2012

poor, trash the needy and shoot, kill and bomb just as well as the Republicans - but we are smarter about it."

xchrom

(108,903 posts)
6. i remember that ad.
Sun Sep 9, 2012, 07:25 AM
Sep 2012

it was amazing then ... it's amazing now.

i'm of the mind we will never see it's like again.

 

dkf

(37,305 posts)
8. link from the article...3 in 4 recipients who find jobs lose them within 6 months
Sun Sep 9, 2012, 07:49 AM
Sep 2012

The training is wholly inadequate with participants sitting around for hours doing nothing. The failure to comply penalty is rampant, requiring participants to start over.

http://www.cvhaction.org/sites/default/files/Missing%20the%20Mark%20-%20Executive%20Summary.pdf




dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
13. Been that way for as long as I can remember
Sun Sep 9, 2012, 09:13 AM
Sep 2012

and my memory goes back to late 1950's...

Several of the courses I took when getting my degree as a Social Worker covered the history of the
Social Welfare.
Most of the money spent on "fighting poverty" never got to the people who needed help,
but instead supported a huge bureaucracy.
Or, to put it in more radical terms, as Frances Piven did, "we need the poor"

Dustlawyer

(10,494 posts)
11. How do you like your "Freedom" now?
Sun Sep 9, 2012, 08:18 AM
Sep 2012

The Powers That Be want the money that went to the poor, and the poor do not vote much. Now that voter registration drives are all but gone, they will continue to get their wish!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How Reforming Welfare and...