Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jsr

(7,712 posts)
Sun Sep 9, 2012, 11:06 PM Sep 2012

NASA hopes the Mars rover doesn't find water

http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-mars-contaminate-20120910,0,365701.story

If the Mars rover finds water, it could be H2 ... uh oh!
If Curiosity locates H2O, a simmering NASA controversy will boil over. The rover's drill bits may be tainted with Earth microbes that could survive upon touching water.
By Louis Sahagun, Los Angeles Times

For all the hopes NASA has pinned on the rover it deposited on Mars last month, one wish has gone unspoken: Please don't find water.

But if by chance the rover Curiosity does find H2O, a controversy that has simmered at NASA for nearly a year will burst into the open. Curiosity's drill bits may be contaminated with Earth microbes. If they are, and if those bits touch water, the organisms could survive. The possible contamination of the drill bits occurred six months before the rover's launch last Nov. 26 ...

About 250,000 bacterial spores throughout Curiosity are assumed to have survived the landing, officials said. Nearly all of them are believed to have perished within minutes of exposure to the harsh Martian conditions in Gale Crater — freezing temperatures, intense ultraviolet radiation and an atmosphere of mostly carbon dioxide.

But scientists have learned in recent years that some Earth life forms can live in space and in at least some of the conditions found on Mars. The European Space Agency discovered that lichens launched on a Russian Soyuz rocket in 2005 survived several days of full exposure to the vacuum of space and ultraviolet and cosmic radiation. ...


36 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
NASA hopes the Mars rover doesn't find water (Original Post) jsr Sep 2012 OP
Well we humans have screwed up earth.why not mars...nobody lives there. nanabugg Sep 2012 #1
And another NASA thread hauled into kneejerk misanthropy on the first response. (nt) Posteritatis Sep 2012 #3
Yep, happens every time. eqfan592 Sep 2012 #4
This misanthropic BS is so predictable. Odin2005 Sep 2012 #7
I think he was Missycim Sep 2012 #33
We haven't screwed up Earth and can't except by perhaps some nuclear means... yawnmaster Sep 2012 #30
and so begins, an epic tale of the evolution of martians JesterCS Sep 2012 #2
Bolero Ellipsis Sep 2012 #5
Allegro Non Troppo ThoughtCriminal Sep 2012 #28
If there is life on Mars, and we presented any kind of danger to them, we would have teddy51 Sep 2012 #6
Nah. If there were intelligent aliens that wanted to get rid of humans... Speck Tater Sep 2012 #8
or invent birth control pills which leach into the ground water and turn everybody into a girl librechik Sep 2012 #21
Wouldn't work. Speck Tater Sep 2012 #27
lol librechik Sep 2012 #29
I'm confused. enlightenment Sep 2012 #9
That is the controversy nadinbrzezinski Sep 2012 #10
As I understood it... NYC Liberal Sep 2012 #11
So.. they are afraid the Martians will sue us for contamination? SoCalDem Sep 2012 #12
So, if that's the fear wouldn't enlightenment Sep 2012 #24
The folks over at NASA are a lot smarter than I am with this stuff, so NYC Liberal Sep 2012 #31
Sorry - that last post was more of a enlightenment Sep 2012 #36
check this out--a former insurance investigator examines/analyzes Mars satellite photos librechik Sep 2012 #13
Uh, he spent his career in the insurance industry, not NASA. (nt) Posteritatis Sep 2012 #26
NASA has spent more than 30 years on Mars trying to find evidence of life. randome Sep 2012 #14
If these microbes survive, isn't that proof enough of life on mars. boston bean Sep 2012 #34
Personally, I welcome our earth spawned mars microbe overlords. nt Javaman Sep 2012 #15
Flesh Eating Slime Mold from Space... Evasporque Sep 2012 #16
Go on! Poke it with a stick! I dare you! randome Sep 2012 #17
Repost Major Nikon Sep 2012 #18
It's terminal ornotna Sep 2012 #19
Love it! Marrah_G Sep 2012 #20
Listen.. If a stray microbe could eventually render Mars habitable annabanana Sep 2012 #22
Thank God they didn't send a probe to Uranus. edbermac Sep 2012 #23
Maybe the microbes could terraform Mars. SWTORFanatic Sep 2012 #25
And so the war with mars began jp11 Sep 2012 #32
What if humans are just evolved microbes left over from drill-bit contamination by ancient aliens? JaneyVee Sep 2012 #35

yawnmaster

(2,812 posts)
30. We haven't screwed up Earth and can't except by perhaps some nuclear means...
Mon Sep 10, 2012, 04:28 PM
Sep 2012

what we can screw up is an environment that humans enjoy.
The Earth will survive long after we are gone, at least until the sun explodes and destroys all life...
and at that point nothing we've done or haven't done matters.

JesterCS

(1,827 posts)
2. and so begins, an epic tale of the evolution of martians
Sun Sep 9, 2012, 11:13 PM
Sep 2012

put on this Planet Mars by the divine spirits of Earth =p

 

teddy51

(3,491 posts)
6. If there is life on Mars, and we presented any kind of danger to them, we would have
Sun Sep 9, 2012, 11:27 PM
Sep 2012

been blowen to hell and back by now!

 

Speck Tater

(10,618 posts)
8. Nah. If there were intelligent aliens that wanted to get rid of humans...
Mon Sep 10, 2012, 12:11 AM
Sep 2012

...they would just put some kind of undetectable contraceptive gas into the atmosphere and wait 75 years for humans to die out. Stealthy. No need for open invasion. No casualties on their side. Low cost for them. And humans wouldn't have a clue that the aliens even existed, let alone that they had successfully invaded earth.

librechik

(30,674 posts)
21. or invent birth control pills which leach into the ground water and turn everybody into a girl
Mon Sep 10, 2012, 12:37 PM
Sep 2012

Being a girl, I prefer that....

Wait, that's already happening! Curse you Martians! Curse your desirable and deadly birth control pills!

 

Speck Tater

(10,618 posts)
27. Wouldn't work.
Mon Sep 10, 2012, 01:50 PM
Sep 2012

Women are too resourceful. They'd figure out how to reproduce without the bother of having us men around.

librechik

(30,674 posts)
29. lol
Mon Sep 10, 2012, 03:55 PM
Sep 2012

we could--but we'd miss you boys too much! We'd set things right, as we are wont to do (when allowed)

enlightenment

(8,830 posts)
9. I'm confused.
Mon Sep 10, 2012, 12:46 AM
Sep 2012

The majority of the article talks about how the drill bit (and Curiosity) could be contaminated with hundreds of thousands of microbes - to the point that it shouldn't be allowed to get near water or ice because the microbes might have survived the launch, the trip, and the conditions on the planet.

Then, toward the end, it discusses Curiosity's next mission - to drill into a rock at Glenelg Intrigue. It says:

Sometime next month, NASA scientists are expected to select a rock at Glenelg Intrigue and bore into it with the drill, which will then transfer aspirin-size samples of powder from the rock into science instruments housed in the belly of the rover. Conley has no concerns that the experiment will contaminate the site because she believes any surviving organisms will die swiftly.


Note that last sentence. Dr. Conley - the Planetary Protection Officer who was not consulted about mounting the drill bit and so changed the mission to keep Curiosity away from ice and water (by the way - I totally love that title) - says that she is unconcerned about the experiment contaminating the site because "any surviving organisms will die swiftly."

Okay . . . so why the hand-wringing about possibly drilling into the ground and hitting water? It sounds like the microbes are doomed anyway.

I'm confused!

NYC Liberal

(20,135 posts)
11. As I understood it...
Mon Sep 10, 2012, 05:02 AM
Sep 2012

they won't survive long...unless they are introduced to water, in which case they could potentially survive and thrive in the water. If they aren't exposed to water they will die off.

That drilling at Glenelg Intrigue isn't scheduled for another month.

enlightenment

(8,830 posts)
24. So, if that's the fear wouldn't
Mon Sep 10, 2012, 12:54 PM
Sep 2012

it be reasonable to deliberately drill some rocks first and kill the bacteria? Are they one use only drills?

I know I'm over-simplifying; it just seems like there should be a more sensible solution than "don't go near the water/ice" (assuming Curiosity finds it).

enlightenment

(8,830 posts)
36. Sorry - that last post was more of a
Tue Sep 11, 2012, 11:23 AM
Sep 2012

thinking 'out loud' rather than an expectation that you know all the details of what NASA does.

Sometimes my curiosity overwhelms my good sense.

librechik

(30,674 posts)
13. check this out--a former insurance investigator examines/analyzes Mars satellite photos
Mon Sep 10, 2012, 11:14 AM
Sep 2012

Last edited Mon Sep 10, 2012, 02:05 PM - Edit history (1)

http://www.marsanomalyresearch.com/

The most obvious thing he noticed (and anyone w photoshop experience can see once it's pointed out) is the vast computerized tampering on the official images released to the public. In fact he's pretty bitterly obsessed about the tampering.

But there's so much data, occasionally they miss things. Now those "misses" are interesting indeed.

such as this:
http://www.marsanomalyresearch.com/evidence-reports/2012/221/real-mars.htm

I'm open minded, but I suppose this info is hard to swallow. I expect the usual forum skeptics to pounce on me and rip Skipper's site to shreds.

I just think it's interesting, and more research needs to be done.
On edit:
thanks for the correction on Skipper's background
 

randome

(34,845 posts)
14. NASA has spent more than 30 years on Mars trying to find evidence of life.
Mon Sep 10, 2012, 11:20 AM
Sep 2012

Each time they think they find something, it's never incontrovertible proof so another mission is planned.

We have a fucking tin can in orbit about Earth doing 'experiments' and yet another attempt to prove -really, REALLY prove this time- that life exists on Mars.

I am sick to death of the half-assed 'adventures' we have had to endure. If they can't get the fucking proof with robots, it's time to send a team of humans.

boston bean

(36,221 posts)
34. If these microbes survive, isn't that proof enough of life on mars.
Tue Sep 11, 2012, 08:13 AM
Sep 2012

Even if they only survive a short time.

There was life on the moon at one time too.

annabanana

(52,791 posts)
22. Listen.. If a stray microbe could eventually render Mars habitable
Mon Sep 10, 2012, 12:39 PM
Sep 2012

Maybe the last remaining Humans from our self-destroyed Earth could migrate. (Or migrate BACK . Perhaps we've been going back and forth all along)

jp11

(2,104 posts)
32. And so the war with mars began
Tue Sep 11, 2012, 08:04 AM
Sep 2012

not with a missle or an asteroid flung at one of the bodies but with germ warfare.

Remember this day fellow earthicans we threw the first punch and we did it with a small car sized robot and dirty drill bits.

USA! USA! USA!

 

JaneyVee

(19,877 posts)
35. What if humans are just evolved microbes left over from drill-bit contamination by ancient aliens?
Tue Sep 11, 2012, 09:23 AM
Sep 2012
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»NASA hopes the Mars rover...