Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Blue State Bandit

(2,122 posts)
Wed Sep 12, 2012, 11:48 AM Sep 2012

UPDATED: Romney Calls Anti-Muslim Movie "American Values" (Was this a Agent Provocateur Op?)

Last edited Wed Sep 12, 2012, 02:21 PM - Edit history (1)

In the wake of the horrible events in North Africa that took the life of 3US Embassy employees including Ambassador Christopher Stevens, the Romney Campaign, has shown a clear lack of diplomatic finesse, and it only got worse.

Before the death of our ambassador was known (and possibly before it actually occurred), The Romney campaign released a brazenly inartfull statement blasting a statement from embassy trying to put distance between the US Government, and a despicably insulting movie posted to youtube by California Developer Sam Bacile and notorious firebrand Terry Jones.

In the closing hour of 9/11 the Romney campaign called the embassy statement “akin to apology" and proclaimed it to be “disgraceful to apologize for American values.”

The embassy statement in full reads:

The Embassy of the United States in Cairo condemns the continuing efforts by misguided individuals to hurt the religious feelings of Muslims – as we condemn efforts to offend believers of all religions. Today, the 11th anniversary of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks on the United States, Americans are honoring our patriots and those who serve our nation as the fitting response to the enemies of democracy. Respect for religious beliefs is a cornerstone of American democracy. We firmly reject the actions by those who abuse the universal right of free speech to hurt the religious beliefs of others.

http://egypt.usembassy.gov/pr091112.html


So, according to what I read in this statement, and the response from the Romney campaign, the Romney campaign believes that being Anti-Muslim is an American value.

I disagree.


UPDATE: Is This a RatFuck Operation?

According to new information, there are growing question as to whether or not California Developer Sam Bacile, credited with producing the movie, actually exists.

Read more here from DU'er Kolesar

So my question is:

Was this an attempt to discredit President Obama's foreign policy regarding North Africa and the Middle East by intentionally instigating these attacks? We know that Terry Jones is involved, but who else is pushing this?
22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
UPDATED: Romney Calls Anti-Muslim Movie "American Values" (Was this a Agent Provocateur Op?) (Original Post) Blue State Bandit Sep 2012 OP
Exactly! ann--- Sep 2012 #1
Hate speech or not, it's still protected. I don't agree with it, but it's still protected. HopeHoops Sep 2012 #4
Not entierly. Blue State Bandit Sep 2012 #6
That falls under "reasonable restrictions" as stated in my post, as does "FIRE!" in a theater. HopeHoops Sep 2012 #8
Agreed. Blue State Bandit Sep 2012 #9
good info.. frylock Sep 2012 #15
Iciting riots is NOT "Free Speech" uponit7771 Sep 2012 #19
See post #8. HopeHoops Sep 2012 #21
Yes, it's protected (to a point). No, it's not an American value. n/t ljm2002 Sep 2012 #20
Post removed Post removed Sep 2012 #14
Hate speech is an "American value:? ProgressiveEconomist Sep 2012 #2
And shamefully, a political tactic. Blue State Bandit Sep 2012 #3
Count on that silly asshole to double down hifiguy Sep 2012 #5
If you mean Romney, he already has. Blue State Bandit Sep 2012 #10
In a diplomatic crisis - side with the people who caused it. Initech Sep 2012 #7
I guess he wants Americans everywhere to be attacked?? nt nanabugg Sep 2012 #11
It's an attempt on the part of the zealots on the religious right... Blue State Bandit Sep 2012 #13
He has proven himself to be a dangerous sociopath. n/t K Gardner Sep 2012 #12
They already found the real guy. several aliases, federal prison time for fraud, right wing christ robinlynne Sep 2012 #16
That movie was like the worst outtakes from Three's Company A-Schwarzenegger Sep 2012 #17
Word. Blue State Bandit Sep 2012 #18
Spam deleted by Violet_Crumble (MIR Team) doribaba6 Sep 2012 #22
 

HopeHoops

(47,675 posts)
4. Hate speech or not, it's still protected. I don't agree with it, but it's still protected.
Wed Sep 12, 2012, 12:02 PM
Sep 2012

It's a fine line between what is and is not protected, and we do have some reasonable restrictions such as threats to harm others, but we can't expect our own views to be protected if we don't allow the ones we totally disagree with to be protected. It sucks, but that's how it has to be.

Blue State Bandit

(2,122 posts)
6. Not entierly.
Wed Sep 12, 2012, 12:21 PM
Sep 2012
The Constitution does not grant absolute immunity to those who would abuse this freedom to incite violence. In 1942 the United States Supreme Court decided Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire .

Chaplinsky was a Jehovah’s Witness who was prosecuted for calling a marshal a fascist and a “damned racketeer” while the marshal attempted to stop him from preaching publicly. The Court upheld the conviction noting that the case presented a gross example of the abuse of the privilege of allowing every citizen to speak his or her mind, “There are certain well-defined and narrowly limited classes of speech, the prevention and punishment of which have never been thought to raise any constitutional problem. These include the lewd and obscene, the profane, the libelous, and the insulting or “fighting words” those that by their very utterance inflict injury or tend to incite an immediate breach of the peace. It has been well observed that such utterances are no essential part of any exposition of ideas, and are of such slight social value as a step to truth that any benefit that may be derived from them is clearly outweighed by the social interest in order and morality.”


http://blog.ctnews.com/meehan/2011/01/11/inciting-violence-and-the-first-amendment/

Response to ann--- (Reply #1)

 

hifiguy

(33,688 posts)
5. Count on that silly asshole to double down
Wed Sep 12, 2012, 12:13 PM
Sep 2012

on teh stoopid. Blazing away at both feet with a machine gun yet again.

Blue State Bandit

(2,122 posts)
10. If you mean Romney, he already has.
Wed Sep 12, 2012, 01:48 PM
Sep 2012

If it's the producer, or the Terry Jones people, I don't think it will be long.

Initech

(100,029 posts)
7. In a diplomatic crisis - side with the people who caused it.
Wed Sep 12, 2012, 12:31 PM
Sep 2012

Yeah that's the kind of backwards thinking we need from someone who wants to be the leader of this country. Ugh...

Blue State Bandit

(2,122 posts)
13. It's an attempt on the part of the zealots on the religious right...
Wed Sep 12, 2012, 01:56 PM
Sep 2012

to draw America into a major war in the Middle east to fulfill their Armageddon fantasies. It is a clear attempt to start a war that could quite litteraly (H/T to Big Joe Biden) kill tens of millions of people.

robinlynne

(15,481 posts)
16. They already found the real guy. several aliases, federal prison time for fraud, right wing christ
Wed Sep 12, 2012, 10:36 PM
Sep 2012

Christian from Egypt. They did not say if American citizen or not.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion» UPDATED: Romney Calls An...