General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFound on the internet: Tara Reade, serial accuser.
Also found: https://ascammersnightmareisjustice.blogspot.com/2020/04/tara-reade-legacy-of-lies-part-one.html?m=1
I don't know the truth about this, but if true it should be shouted from the rooftops.
The Magistrate
(95,243 posts)Much of this has been in circulation almost from the start. One of the theft accusations is new, but well backed up. This omits the bankruptcies, which may have contained elements of fraud. Not all of the assault accusations are sexual.
RandySF
(58,511 posts)Cha
(296,875 posts)Cha
(296,875 posts)I've seen it in official investigative reports, too.
Maybe here.. too tired to look right now..
http://ascammersnightmareisjustice.blogspot.com/2020/04/tara-reade-legacy-of-lies-part-one.html
SunSeeker
(51,520 posts)UpInArms
(51,280 posts)WhiteTara
(29,692 posts)with a major publication
peasant one
(150 posts)Women are always judged by their appearance and their clothes. It is wrong and it should stop. Please stop.
WhiteTara
(29,692 posts)are so inappropriate for a major news interview when you are accusing someone of assaulting you 20 something years ago.
oasis
(49,335 posts)yuiyoshida
(41,818 posts)maybe this message will help with exposure. K&R !
TomVilmer
(1,832 posts)canetoad
(17,136 posts)There is truth in her allegations?
My impression is she would be called, 'an unreliable witness.'
TomVilmer
(1,832 posts)... since this woman is a victim... of something, and such pain should not be made into memes.
DenverJared
(457 posts)like Katie Halper, Cenk Uygur and Brihana Joy Grey among them.
The_REAL_Ecumenist
(715 posts)(hint: her accusations evolve), she can't "find" the reports where she accused him of the fuckery she claims, admitted that she DIDN'T accuse him of what she's accusing him of NOW in 1993 & can't seem to explain why; the archives in the federal government where such an accusation would be located have NOTHING, NADA & NONE of her claims at all: she had fifty eleven aliases & seems to have made a habit of accusing everybody & their brother of everything she can think of; she has a problem with
1) telling the unvarnished truth
2) Sanity, as she claims that she both idolises pootie-poo & says that he's in love with her...I guess?
3) scheming, stealing money & services from folks
4) setting up gofundme accts left, right & centre & claiming that some shambling stranger did this on her behalf when called on it.
5) Oh & did I mention that she cancelled her grand interview with fauxspews Yesterday? I would NEVER have
As a survivor of child rape, ( I was 5 YEARS OLD & endured full penetration of an ADULT man for a year EVERY SINGLE DAY for a YEAR except THE WEEKENDS! I had another assault when I was 19 by a Iranian creep who I mistakenly thought was a friend) & funnily enough, I've NEVER changed my testimony...EVER. Imagine that
She's proven herself unbelievable by her changing what she original claim was every chance she got...So do I think that shes believable?
Uh, NOPE!! I've had friends who were sexually assaulted & kept it themselves because of the fear of being labelled & shamed, as I did until I was 17 years old, when what I laughingly refer to as "my father" was in the middle of calling me a whore, (I didn't even have my first date until I was 20 YEARS OLD). So, there's WAY TOO MUCH SMOKE around her while she screams that there's no fire at all.
UpInArms
(51,280 posts)....
Cha
(296,875 posts)But you have to have read all the history to know what you're talking about.
The Magistrate
(95,243 posts)An accuser gets a hearing. Once heard, people decide, using intelligence guided by experience in examining character and evidence.
When dealing with the general run of sexual harassment claims, lewd looks or words, a quid pro quo involving sexual favors, insistence on meetings outside the office or business hours, which are not criminal behaviors, however unwelcome or even distressing they may be, it is all very well to presume the claim has weight. In a civil matter, only a very slight edge in favor of the charge is required, after all. But a criminal charge requires proof beyond a reasonable doubt, and that standard, as a matter of cultural expectation, applies out of court as well as in. Reade made a charge of criminal assault, and has done so without any evidence beyond her word, and examination of her character, as revealed by her history, leaves no reason whatever to believe her unsupported word in any matter, let alone in a criminal charge.
"Defeat of a dangerous enemy is something to be for."
UTUSN
(70,649 posts)mahatmakanejeeves
(57,319 posts)How does this differ from "some people are saying"?
If you were a journalist, would you say that you had done sufficient research for an article based on this to be published?
No, thanks.
Response to mahatmakanejeeves (Reply #14)
Lunabell This message was self-deleted by its author.