Do you know who kills over symbolic offenses?

That's OK, a long time ago I used to dream about being a Jet and winding up with Natalie Wood. Godamn Robert Wagner. Now it will never happen.

A bit more complex than that but the muslims factions which have been at each others throats there for quite some time.

Well put.

Because the US government isn't Muslim. It's only murder and mayhem when "those people" do it, you know.

the Crips? Really?

I'm pretty sure most of the people in those neighborhoods would disagree with the idea that they hadn't been fucked over by our society.

perceived "affronts."

He wasn't a gang member, though he had a few like-minded associates. He did kill a lot of people who had nothing to do with his particular, warped gripes.

what rights could we dispose of so people like him would love us again?

Clearly it couldn't be his fault. We provoked him in some way and if we have to forfeit some rights so that won't happen again so-be-it.

Seems to me like all the eye-witness accounts point to this being a planned terrorist strike, not just a mob gone wild. What I have heard is that several truck loads of men showed up at the consulate flying black flags and sporting automatic rifles and grenade launchers( or maybe RPG 's ). That's not how I would equip myself for a protest.
The distinction is important because if it is characterized as mob violence, that makes it easier for chicken hawks to lay the blame on the Libyan people . If this was a planned terrorist attack, it is clear that our target should be the individuals responsible, as well as the organization(s) that were involved.

anybody hear anything different about what happened?

well-armed people. There are also people climbing in and starting fires, but the whole thing looks coordinated. Time will tell. More facts will emerge.

I have been following the coverage of these events as provided by Rachel Maddow, and it is her contention (if I am following her correctly) that there are actually two different forces, or groups of people at work; at least there are in the events occurring in Libya.

She has pointed out in various video footage that one group is of the common, unorganized masses, who appear to possess less than inspiring intelligence, and who are angry at the USA in general. They are just looking for a reason to beat buildings with sticks and burn cars. Distant news of an offensive movie trailer has given them pause to do so.

The other group is comprised of actual terrorists who have an affiliation with "Al Cyda" (you all remember Al, right?) and whose intent it is is to wage G-String against the USA. They are the ones with the hand held rocket launchers, and the plastic bombs, and the flame throwers who are intentionally trying to level entire buildings and kill people.

Beyond the limits of Libya, it is also her contention that the violence towards U.S. facilities that is simultaneously occurring in other 14 countries (and counting), is solely the work of the common masses, who are not organized. Their motivation is similar to their counterpart in Libya.

Like you say, "Time will tell."

But the killers were heavily armed and organized. The mass of angry people probably would not have killed Stevens by themselves even if they had made their way into part of the compound.

I recall that the first reports said that Stevens had died of smoke inhalation. Has that been confirmed?

I haven't heard a word since those first reports that said Stevens died of smoke inhalation. The report that I heard also intimated that the three others who also died, did so while trying to protect him, and that they also died of smoke inhalation.

We have religious wingnut killers here in America as well. Scott Roeder (Dr. Tiller's killer) quickly came to mind. These people even put up websites complete with pictures and address's of others who should be killed for religious/symbolic reasons.

Oh well, if you want to blow of steam over an insult to you religion - go for it...

I guess.

Plenty of people have been killed over this:

My son mentioned something last night that made me wonder. 4 people died because of riots but more than that is killed in almost any of America's big cities and there is no outrage about that.

We can't forget the tribal nature of Islam.

Still, it doesn't merit the broad brush hate that Muslims have to endure. There are more than a billion Muslims in the world. The rioters make up perhaps a percent of a percent of a percent of those Muslims.

islam is easy enough to convert to, it's exclusivist but it's not *exclusive*. i would describe it as more feudal than tribal (otoh that would describe basically every major religion)

The only difference among street gangs, organized crime, and terrorism are its motives.

Street gangs and the mob have similar motives: profiting from illegal activity, such as drugs, prostitution, gambling, etc. Killing is part of enforcing their control of the illegal activity. If innocent people are killed during a gang war, it is secondary to gunning down their targets.
Terrorists' motives are largely political; they want to force governments to do their bidding, even if innocent people get killed.

No. They say "That is fucking INSANE, what the hell is wrong with those people?"

There's no attempt to justify that or get people to "understand" gang violence. They're simply condemned by society full stop.

Thanks for pointing that out.

already noted

"You should have known not to wear plaid on that side of town, really it's your fault for provoking them".

Nor do we argue for restrictions on how you can dress to limit such events.

"yes freedom of expression is nice, but really shouldn't be ban all plaid clothing? There's clothing and then there's aggressive hate-clothing. Do we really want to live in a world where any idiot can go and by a plaid outfit?"