Mon Jun 15, 2020, 11:06 AM
EffieBlack (14,249 posts)
Once again, my friend is proven right ... The courts ARE holding"The Judiciary branch is strong and WE. WILL. HOLD" A few weeks ago, a dear old friend, a Republican-appointed federal judge, trying to console me during a moment of despair about the future of our country, said to me “The Judiciary branch is strong and will hold.” When I expressed skepticism, he leaned toward me, looked me dead in the eye, and said as firmly as he could without shouting: “We are strong and WE. WILL. HOLD.” https://www.democraticunderground.com/100212113242
|
27 replies, 4676 views
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
EffieBlack | Jun 2020 | OP |
Phoenix61 | Jun 2020 | #1 | |
EffieBlack | Jun 2020 | #2 | |
Proud Liberal Dem | Jun 2020 | #12 | |
yonder | Jun 2020 | #18 | |
EffieBlack | Jun 2020 | #27 | |
malaise | Jun 2020 | #4 | |
fierywoman | Jun 2020 | #5 | |
malaise | Jun 2020 | #9 | |
fierywoman | Jun 2020 | #11 | |
Ponietz | Jun 2020 | #3 | |
VWolf | Jun 2020 | #16 | |
Amaryllis | Jun 2020 | #25 | |
Solomon | Jun 2020 | #6 | |
maxsolomon | Jun 2020 | #7 | |
StarfishSaver | Jun 2020 | #8 | |
maxsolomon | Jun 2020 | #10 | |
CaptainTruth | Jun 2020 | #17 | |
Hortensis | Jun 2020 | #23 | |
LizBeth | Jun 2020 | #13 | |
cstanleytech | Jun 2020 | #14 | |
BamaRefugee | Jun 2020 | #15 | |
Warpy | Jun 2020 | #19 | |
Cosmocat | Jun 2020 | #20 | |
kairos12 | Jun 2020 | #21 | |
cstanleytech | Jun 2020 | #24 | |
Gothmog | Jun 2020 | #22 | |
Quixote1818 | Jun 2020 | #26 |
Response to EffieBlack (Original post)
Mon Jun 15, 2020, 11:09 AM
Phoenix61 (16,681 posts)
1. This is why Mcconnell is so hell bent to
appoint Federalist judges. Currently, the courts are the only thing saving us.
|
Response to Phoenix61 (Reply #1)
Mon Jun 15, 2020, 11:43 AM
EffieBlack (14,249 posts)
2. Yes
He and Trump must be really ticked off that their first Supreme Court pick isn’t completely in their pocket ...
|
Response to EffieBlack (Reply #2)
Mon Jun 15, 2020, 12:22 PM
Proud Liberal Dem (24,074 posts)
12. Their first (stolen) Supreme Court pick
I assume that they thought that they would get a straight-up replacement for Scalia, although that might be more Brett "I like Beer" Kavanaugh
|
Response to EffieBlack (Reply #2)
Mon Jun 15, 2020, 01:40 PM
yonder (9,413 posts)
18. Off topic, good to see you back.
I enjoy reading your posts.
|
Response to Phoenix61 (Reply #1)
Mon Jun 15, 2020, 11:49 AM
malaise (261,633 posts)
4. Let him appoint them
Many will be exposed and removed - some will have shares in private juvi and adult prisons .
Follow them and the money. |
Response to malaise (Reply #4)
Mon Jun 15, 2020, 11:51 AM
fierywoman (7,251 posts)
5. And then there was the Supreme Court nominee who became a judge who lied to the Senate.
Response to fierywoman (Reply #5)
Mon Jun 15, 2020, 12:11 PM
malaise (261,633 posts)
9. Clean up time coming
Watch the ride
|
Response to malaise (Reply #9)
Mon Jun 15, 2020, 12:21 PM
fierywoman (7,251 posts)
11. Many acres of sage will neeed to be burned!
Response to EffieBlack (Original post)
Mon Jun 15, 2020, 11:46 AM
Ponietz (2,650 posts)
3. I remember that post -- thanks.
Response to Ponietz (Reply #3)
Mon Jun 15, 2020, 01:34 PM
VWolf (3,944 posts)
16. Same here
I felt really good reading it then, and I feel even better seeing what's been happening since.
|
Response to EffieBlack (Original post)
Mon Jun 15, 2020, 11:57 AM
Solomon (12,221 posts)
6. Yes I have been saying this too.
I'm so proud of Judge Sullivan and Judge Walton also, who I spent my formative legal career practising before.
Go Judge Sullivan! Go Judge Walton! |
Response to EffieBlack (Original post)
Mon Jun 15, 2020, 12:02 PM
maxsolomon (31,465 posts)
7. McConnell's packing of the courts is going to take a while to pay off.
But pay off it will.
In 10 years, many of the Judges now holding the line will be retired if not buried. The barely-qualified 40 year old ideologues will be hitting their stride. |
Response to maxsolomon (Reply #7)
Mon Jun 15, 2020, 12:08 PM
StarfishSaver (18,486 posts)
8. That's why we need to vote like the courts are the only thing that matters
Just like Republicans do ...
No more of that idiotic "Joe Biden still needs to earn my vote" crap. |
Response to StarfishSaver (Reply #8)
Mon Jun 15, 2020, 12:16 PM
maxsolomon (31,465 posts)
10. I heard that yesterday on NPR from a young Af-Am Activist
"This is the last time I'll vote for a substandard candidate".
Oh young person, let me assure you that it is not the last time. |
Response to StarfishSaver (Reply #8)
Mon Jun 15, 2020, 01:34 PM
CaptainTruth (6,277 posts)
17. +1 bazillion
Response to StarfishSaver (Reply #8)
Mon Jun 15, 2020, 04:00 PM
Hortensis (58,785 posts)
23. Good enough way to put it, true enough,
for those who need simple certainty. And too many do.
"No more of that idiotic "Joe Biden still needs to earn my vote" crap." |
Response to EffieBlack (Original post)
Mon Jun 15, 2020, 12:45 PM
LizBeth (9,897 posts)
13. That is good to hear.
Response to EffieBlack (Original post)
Mon Jun 15, 2020, 01:21 PM
cstanleytech (25,395 posts)
14. If a fig leaf is called holding imagine what could be done if they used the tree.
Response to EffieBlack (Original post)
Mon Jun 15, 2020, 01:31 PM
BamaRefugee (3,440 posts)
15. The leaders of the Confederacy said the very same words. We shall see.
Response to EffieBlack (Original post)
Mon Jun 15, 2020, 01:45 PM
Warpy (108,965 posts)
19. I just hope they'll hold for the female half of the population
That is what I'm most skeptical about in terms of civil rights. Women with civil rights, especially bodily autonomy, are an historical aberration to them that has us going against nature by not being chained to a kitchen stove, constantly pregnant against our will.
Still, however much I despised Scalia, we have to give the old devil his due. When it counted for LGBTQ civil rights, he came down on the side of justice and overturned the sodomy laws in Texas, specifically, and the country, generally. They will curtail civil liberties only when they conflict with corporate might, and even then it will likely be a mixed bag and will be unlikely to uphold the rights of women. |
Response to EffieBlack (Original post)
Mon Jun 15, 2020, 01:46 PM
Cosmocat (14,488 posts)
20. Meh
the right wingers on the SC broke to the light THIS time.
Not the norm, by a far sight. |
Response to Cosmocat (Reply #20)
Mon Jun 15, 2020, 02:02 PM
kairos12 (12,490 posts)
21. Agree. They will use this ruling as a human shield
to protect all Drumpt tax documents. And to support further voter suppression efforts.
|
Response to kairos12 (Reply #21)
Mon Jun 15, 2020, 04:59 PM
cstanleytech (25,395 posts)
24. Yup. After all the conservative justices already rubber stamped their approval of gerrymandering.
Response to EffieBlack (Original post)
Mon Jun 15, 2020, 02:44 PM
Gothmog (136,221 posts)
22. I am pleased
We can live through one term of trump but we have to get rid of trump. The control of the courts is on the ballot and we have two seats that need to be protected
|
Response to EffieBlack (Original post)
Mon Jun 15, 2020, 09:32 PM
Quixote1818 (28,197 posts)
26. This was a feeling I was getting seeing a lot of rulings in that last couple of years
Quite a few Trump judges ruling against him for example.
|