General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIf you had your choice of any previous President which would you want to lead the Covid 19 effort
This was a question that came up as I listened to a podcast of the Thomas Jefferson Hour yesterday and thought it was an interesting one to pose.
My choice would be Harry Truman, but I can certainly think others would do a good job as well.
redstatebluegirl
(12,265 posts)tinrobot
(10,895 posts)I agree. Obama.
redstatebluegirl
(12,265 posts)Jane Austin
(9,199 posts)Last edited Mon Jun 22, 2020, 11:27 AM - Edit history (1)
Obama!
Always competent.
hlthe2b
(102,225 posts)Chainfire
(17,530 posts)Poiuyt
(18,122 posts)Both knew how to handle catastrophes.
SheltieLover
(57,073 posts)He was a master of running the government in his prime. Yes, Vietnam was awful but in terms of running a competent government the period from 63 to 66 stands out.
redstatebluegirl
(12,265 posts)He was a master at getting what he wanted through Congress. Of course Congress was very different then than it is now.
HelpImSurrounded
(441 posts)One of Obama's great strengths was the humility to listen to his experts.
Obama would have come out in January with a message of unity and a warning to take this seriously. Then he would have stepped out of the spotlight and let the CDC lead.
LizBeth
(9,952 posts)others and say Obama.
raging moderate
(4,297 posts)Obama.
Akacia
(583 posts)onecaliberal
(32,826 posts)judeling
(1,086 posts)For just the Covid-19 part. He did a very good job with the Marshal Plan.
But for President in charge over all LBJ or Ike.
malchickiwick
(1,474 posts)Hoover wasn't much of a "doer," and the Marshall Plan occurred on Harry's watch, not Herbie's.
judeling
(1,086 posts)With his letters was he one of the main reasons that the entire occupation was restructured.
Hoover is a fascinating figure in a different time he may have well been one of the best Presidents we had. It is actually not understood hao much of the New Deal built on things he had underway during the War and postwar are really not discussed enough.
lapucelle
(18,250 posts)He was a Republican president from 1929-1933.
In the midst of the economic crisis, Hoover was decisively defeated by Democratic nominee Franklin D. Roosevelt in the 1932 presidential election. After leaving office, Hoover enjoyed one of the longest retirements of any former president, and he authored numerous works in subsequent decades. Hoover became increasingly conservative in this time, and he strongly criticized Roosevelt's foreign policy and New Deal domestic agenda.
In the 1940s and 1950s, Hoover's public reputation was slightly rehabilitated after serving in various assignments for Presidents Harry S. Truman and Dwight D. Eisenhower, including as chairman of the Hoover Commission. Though he managed somewhat to rehabilitate his legacy, Hoover is still widely regarded as an inadequate U.S. president, and most polls of historians and political scientists rank him in the bottom third overall.
judeling
(1,086 posts)A lot of he early moves FDR made in the first 100 days were built on things Hoover had in place.
During he FDR and Truman used him, but more in the background. Hoover actually never really tried to rehabilitate his reputation until the Marshal Plan was in place.
edhopper
(33,570 posts)for this folderol.
lapucelle
(18,250 posts)and First 100 Days AND for Democratic President Truman and Democratic-appointed SOS Marshall's post-WWII European economic recovery plan?
ananda
(28,858 posts)Any of those would be excellent.
3Hotdogs
(12,372 posts)specially on Sunday mornings.
malchickiwick
(1,474 posts)And hopefully, SCOTUS wouldn't be there blocking progress at every turn.
SoonerPride
(12,286 posts)Boomerproud
(7,951 posts)right along beside them.
Greybnk48
(10,167 posts)hands down! I'd definitely want President Kennedy or FDR to handle the financial end of it.
JT45242
(2,262 posts)He was a nuclear engineer who understood how to make plans with other really smart people. He also deeply cares about the plight of people of color (A True Christian who has lived the Matthew 25 code of taking care of the homeless, hungry, etc.) for years.
Given the expanse of executive orders since he left office, his inability to play ball with Republicans in Congress would be less of an issue.
He gets a bad rap because the Republicans blocked everything he tried to do. Reagan and his crones committed treason by paying the Iranians to hold onto the hostages. He inherited an economic mess because of OPEC manipulation of oil prices.
Smart, willing to listen to other smart people, and compassionate. I'll take the scientist politician over the lawyer politicians for a pandemic.
Having been to the Hoover museum in Iowa, although a failed President, he would have made a great task force leader as he did with rebuilding Europe and helping those struggling with starvation. Some are better doing work than being a mouthpiece and he was one of them.
Rhiannon12866
(205,208 posts)And one of the primary initiatives of the Carter Center has been to eradicate disease.
zipplewrath
(16,646 posts)A president who could probably understand the data himself, instead of having his experts explain it to him.
aidbo
(2,328 posts)ooky
(8,922 posts)Sunsky
(1,737 posts)The man is a genius and an excellent leader.
lark
(23,091 posts)I'd choose any Democrat, but in order
Obama
FDR
Johnson
Carter
Clinton
Sherman A1
(38,958 posts)A cardboard box would have done better.
hamsterjill
(15,220 posts)He is a great leader who is humble enough to learn from those smarter than he is in specific fields. He cares when people are hurting.
God knows we need a miracle. I hope Joe will make use of Obamas strengths in his campaign and in counsel to his administration.
democrank
(11,092 posts)JI7
(89,247 posts)Marrah_Goodman
(1,586 posts)SidDithers
(44,228 posts)FDR might have rounded up Chinese-Americans and put them into isolation camps.
Sid
Buckeyeblue
(5,499 posts)I think Clinton would have done the best at explaining to people why they needed to stay home, wear a mask, etc.