Dammit! It's being reported that 2 to 1 decision by Ct. Of Appeals is ordering Judge Sullivan to

[Solomon]

dismiss the Flynn case!

[Tommy_Carcetti]

1. We know. Sit down.

[House of Roberts]

2. En banc hearing soon to follow?

I don't think this ends short of the SCOTUS.

[agingdem]

3. I may be the only one

Last edited Wed Jun 24, 2020, 03:56 PM - Edit history (1)

but I'm not going to lose sleep over this one...I'm tired of everything Trump...I just want him gone...

[shanti]

4. Does this decision set precedent?

Because they WILL use it again and again.

[octoberlib]

5. All he needs to do is call for an en banc review.

Link to tweet

Just finished the Flynn decision.

It is an excrescence, as the dissent points out. It guts one of the most important safeguards of our democracy: an independent judiciary.

Sullivan should seek en banc review. He will win if he does--the opinion is that weak.

[blaze]

7. Thank you!

<taking a deep breath>

[Solomon]

9. Thank you!

I hope Judge Sullivan asks for the review!

[tishaLA]

12. And by the time the decision happens, we are in 2021

with a DOJ willing to go through with sentencing.

Link to tweet

[UCmeNdc]

6. What was their reasoning?

Can this decision be appealed?

[TripleKatPad]

8. No despair here. In fact...

Flynn may have serious regrets about this come January.
Tick tock, Mikey. Tick tock.

Link to tweet

[Solomon]

10. Good point.

[ooky]

11. He'll have his pardon by then.

The election will be in the rear view mirror.

[Cicada]

13. Trump would have pardoned him anyway